Aliénation et émancipation en recherche, détour par la santé mentale et la recherche « avec »

This article first proposes a parallel between the process of psychiatric reform and the transformations taking place in the human and social sciences, as well as a state of the influence of the former on the latter. This entry anchors the question of alienation and emancipation of researchers in a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gilles Monceau, Marguerite Soulière, Cinira Magali Fortuna
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Université de Provence 2020-12-01
Series:Questions Vives
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/questionsvives/4646
id doaj-a53a3794b14e415aa4c2d0987165c228
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a53a3794b14e415aa4c2d0987165c2282021-04-08T18:23:05ZfraUniversité de ProvenceQuestions Vives1635-40791775-433X2020-12-013310.4000/questionsvives.4646Aliénation et émancipation en recherche, détour par la santé mentale et la recherche « avec »Gilles MonceauMarguerite SoulièreCinira Magali FortunaThis article first proposes a parallel between the process of psychiatric reform and the transformations taking place in the human and social sciences, as well as a state of the influence of the former on the latter. This entry anchors the question of alienation and emancipation of researchers in a historical-political process. Then, the authors propose a concrete contribution that combines praxeological, heuristic and critical aims. They present the creation and dynamics of an international (mainly Brazil, Canada and France ) and interdisciplinary scientific network. Finally, the analysis of the network’s activities illustrated by a research example sheds light on how the transformations of practices include the critical reflexivity of researchers on their own alienations and the collective search for alternative modes of conducting research activities. At stake is the emancipation of researchers, the types of knowledge produced and the people involved.http://journals.openedition.org/questionsvives/4646alienation in research; emancipatory research practices; critical reflexivity; research network with
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gilles Monceau
Marguerite Soulière
Cinira Magali Fortuna
spellingShingle Gilles Monceau
Marguerite Soulière
Cinira Magali Fortuna
Aliénation et émancipation en recherche, détour par la santé mentale et la recherche « avec »
Questions Vives
alienation in research; emancipatory research practices; critical reflexivity; research network with
author_facet Gilles Monceau
Marguerite Soulière
Cinira Magali Fortuna
author_sort Gilles Monceau
title Aliénation et émancipation en recherche, détour par la santé mentale et la recherche « avec »
title_short Aliénation et émancipation en recherche, détour par la santé mentale et la recherche « avec »
title_full Aliénation et émancipation en recherche, détour par la santé mentale et la recherche « avec »
title_fullStr Aliénation et émancipation en recherche, détour par la santé mentale et la recherche « avec »
title_full_unstemmed Aliénation et émancipation en recherche, détour par la santé mentale et la recherche « avec »
title_sort aliénation et émancipation en recherche, détour par la santé mentale et la recherche « avec »
publisher Université de Provence
series Questions Vives
issn 1635-4079
1775-433X
publishDate 2020-12-01
description This article first proposes a parallel between the process of psychiatric reform and the transformations taking place in the human and social sciences, as well as a state of the influence of the former on the latter. This entry anchors the question of alienation and emancipation of researchers in a historical-political process. Then, the authors propose a concrete contribution that combines praxeological, heuristic and critical aims. They present the creation and dynamics of an international (mainly Brazil, Canada and France ) and interdisciplinary scientific network. Finally, the analysis of the network’s activities illustrated by a research example sheds light on how the transformations of practices include the critical reflexivity of researchers on their own alienations and the collective search for alternative modes of conducting research activities. At stake is the emancipation of researchers, the types of knowledge produced and the people involved.
topic alienation in research; emancipatory research practices; critical reflexivity; research network with
url http://journals.openedition.org/questionsvives/4646
work_keys_str_mv AT gillesmonceau alienationetemancipationenrecherchedetourparlasantementaleetlarechercheavec
AT margueritesouliere alienationetemancipationenrecherchedetourparlasantementaleetlarechercheavec
AT ciniramagalifortuna alienationetemancipationenrecherchedetourparlasantementaleetlarechercheavec
_version_ 1721533969035427840