Varying Abstractions: a conceptual vs. distributional view on prepositional polysemy

The term ‘meaning’, as it is presently employed in Linguistics, is a polysemous concept, covering a broad range of operational definitions. Focussing on two of these definitions, meaning as ‘concept’ and meaning as ‘context’ (also known as ‘distributional semantics’), this paper explores to what ext...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lauren Fonteyn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Library of Humanities 2021-07-01
Series:Glossa
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.glossa-journal.org/article/id/5470/
id doaj-a522ac5ed88d4fa7b8bb8c17dc3f3f32
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a522ac5ed88d4fa7b8bb8c17dc3f3f322021-08-18T09:37:22ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesGlossa2397-18352021-07-016110.5334/gjgl.1323Varying Abstractions: a conceptual vs. distributional view on prepositional polysemyLauren Fonteyn0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5706-8418Leiden University, Arsenaalstraat 1, 2311 CT LeidenThe term ‘meaning’, as it is presently employed in Linguistics, is a polysemous concept, covering a broad range of operational definitions. Focussing on two of these definitions, meaning as ‘concept’ and meaning as ‘context’ (also known as ‘distributional semantics’), this paper explores to what extent these operational definitions lead to converging conclusions regarding the number and nature of distinct senses a polysemous form covers. More specifically, it investigates whether the sense network that emerges from the principled polysemy model of over as proposed by Tyler & Evans (2003; 2001) can be reconstructed by the neural language model BERT. The study assesses whether the contextual information encoded in BERT embeddings can be employed to succesfully (i) recognize the abstract sense categories and (ii) replicate the relative distances between the senses of over proposed in the principled polysemy model. The results suggest that, while there is partial convergence, the two models ultimately lead to different global abstractions because the imagistic information that plays a key role in conceptual approaches to prepositional meaning may not be encoded in contextualized word embeddings.https://www.glossa-journal.org/article/id/5470/PrepositionsPolysemyImage SchemaMetaphorDistributional SemanticsBERT
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lauren Fonteyn
spellingShingle Lauren Fonteyn
Varying Abstractions: a conceptual vs. distributional view on prepositional polysemy
Glossa
Prepositions
Polysemy
Image Schema
Metaphor
Distributional Semantics
BERT
author_facet Lauren Fonteyn
author_sort Lauren Fonteyn
title Varying Abstractions: a conceptual vs. distributional view on prepositional polysemy
title_short Varying Abstractions: a conceptual vs. distributional view on prepositional polysemy
title_full Varying Abstractions: a conceptual vs. distributional view on prepositional polysemy
title_fullStr Varying Abstractions: a conceptual vs. distributional view on prepositional polysemy
title_full_unstemmed Varying Abstractions: a conceptual vs. distributional view on prepositional polysemy
title_sort varying abstractions: a conceptual vs. distributional view on prepositional polysemy
publisher Open Library of Humanities
series Glossa
issn 2397-1835
publishDate 2021-07-01
description The term ‘meaning’, as it is presently employed in Linguistics, is a polysemous concept, covering a broad range of operational definitions. Focussing on two of these definitions, meaning as ‘concept’ and meaning as ‘context’ (also known as ‘distributional semantics’), this paper explores to what extent these operational definitions lead to converging conclusions regarding the number and nature of distinct senses a polysemous form covers. More specifically, it investigates whether the sense network that emerges from the principled polysemy model of over as proposed by Tyler & Evans (2003; 2001) can be reconstructed by the neural language model BERT. The study assesses whether the contextual information encoded in BERT embeddings can be employed to succesfully (i) recognize the abstract sense categories and (ii) replicate the relative distances between the senses of over proposed in the principled polysemy model. The results suggest that, while there is partial convergence, the two models ultimately lead to different global abstractions because the imagistic information that plays a key role in conceptual approaches to prepositional meaning may not be encoded in contextualized word embeddings.
topic Prepositions
Polysemy
Image Schema
Metaphor
Distributional Semantics
BERT
url https://www.glossa-journal.org/article/id/5470/
work_keys_str_mv AT laurenfonteyn varyingabstractionsaconceptualvsdistributionalviewonprepositionalpolysemy
_version_ 1721203338709565440