The Time of Collective Memory: Social Cohesion and Historical Discontinuity in Paul Ricœur’s Memory, History, Forgetting

One of principal tasks of Paul Ricoeur’s Memory, History, Forgetting is to analyze the phenomenon of social cohesion, understood not as a uniform bond, but in terms of human plurality that arises from a diversity of perspectives of remembering groups rooted in complex stratifications and concatenati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jeffrey Andrew Barash
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2019-09-01
Series:Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/ricoeur/article/view/471
id doaj-a517c44aa9104e43b7f7fe0d7e087dd9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a517c44aa9104e43b7f7fe0d7e087dd92020-11-25T02:48:05ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghÉtudes Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies2156-78082019-09-0110110211110.5195/errs.2019.471225The Time of Collective Memory: Social Cohesion and Historical Discontinuity in Paul Ricœur’s Memory, History, ForgettingJeffrey Andrew Barash0Université de Picardie, AmiensOne of principal tasks of Paul Ricoeur’s Memory, History, Forgetting is to analyze the phenomenon of social cohesion, understood not as a uniform bond, but in terms of human plurality that arises from a diversity of perspectives of remembering groups rooted in complex stratifications and concatenations. This paper focuses on the role of remembrance and of its historical inscription as a source of social cohesion, which is subject to rupture and dissolution over time. It first identifies the way in which, according to Ricœur, memory and history function as essential preconditions of social cohesion; following this, it examines the significance and scope of temporal rupture and discontinuity to which this cohesion is subject. In examining Ricœur’s reflection on social cohesion and on the discontinuity to which it is subject over time, I aim to place his thought in a critical light in order to set in relief what I take to be an important aporia it encounters.http://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/ricoeur/article/view/471collective memoryhistorical discontinuitycassirerhalbwachshusserlsymbol
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jeffrey Andrew Barash
spellingShingle Jeffrey Andrew Barash
The Time of Collective Memory: Social Cohesion and Historical Discontinuity in Paul Ricœur’s Memory, History, Forgetting
Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies
collective memory
historical discontinuity
cassirer
halbwachs
husserl
symbol
author_facet Jeffrey Andrew Barash
author_sort Jeffrey Andrew Barash
title The Time of Collective Memory: Social Cohesion and Historical Discontinuity in Paul Ricœur’s Memory, History, Forgetting
title_short The Time of Collective Memory: Social Cohesion and Historical Discontinuity in Paul Ricœur’s Memory, History, Forgetting
title_full The Time of Collective Memory: Social Cohesion and Historical Discontinuity in Paul Ricœur’s Memory, History, Forgetting
title_fullStr The Time of Collective Memory: Social Cohesion and Historical Discontinuity in Paul Ricœur’s Memory, History, Forgetting
title_full_unstemmed The Time of Collective Memory: Social Cohesion and Historical Discontinuity in Paul Ricœur’s Memory, History, Forgetting
title_sort time of collective memory: social cohesion and historical discontinuity in paul ricœur’s memory, history, forgetting
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
series Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies
issn 2156-7808
publishDate 2019-09-01
description One of principal tasks of Paul Ricoeur’s Memory, History, Forgetting is to analyze the phenomenon of social cohesion, understood not as a uniform bond, but in terms of human plurality that arises from a diversity of perspectives of remembering groups rooted in complex stratifications and concatenations. This paper focuses on the role of remembrance and of its historical inscription as a source of social cohesion, which is subject to rupture and dissolution over time. It first identifies the way in which, according to Ricœur, memory and history function as essential preconditions of social cohesion; following this, it examines the significance and scope of temporal rupture and discontinuity to which this cohesion is subject. In examining Ricœur’s reflection on social cohesion and on the discontinuity to which it is subject over time, I aim to place his thought in a critical light in order to set in relief what I take to be an important aporia it encounters.
topic collective memory
historical discontinuity
cassirer
halbwachs
husserl
symbol
url http://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/ricoeur/article/view/471
work_keys_str_mv AT jeffreyandrewbarash thetimeofcollectivememorysocialcohesionandhistoricaldiscontinuityinpaulricœursmemoryhistoryforgetting
AT jeffreyandrewbarash timeofcollectivememorysocialcohesionandhistoricaldiscontinuityinpaulricœursmemoryhistoryforgetting
_version_ 1724750115558653952