Scoping Pharmacy Students’ Learning Outcomes: Where Do We Stand?

<b>Background:</b> The professional abilities of graduate pharmacists have been associated with pharmacy undergraduates’ educational settings and features. This study aimed to perform a scoping review on how students’ learning outcomes are achieved, including learning assessment strategi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carla Pires, Afonso Cavaco
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-02-01
Series:Pharmacy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4787/7/1/23
id doaj-a5167276d44f4b0a8d72ce248f0c222e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a5167276d44f4b0a8d72ce248f0c222e2020-11-24T21:35:22ZengMDPI AGPharmacy2226-47872019-02-01712310.3390/pharmacy7010023pharmacy7010023Scoping Pharmacy Students’ Learning Outcomes: Where Do We Stand?Carla Pires0Afonso Cavaco1CBIOS-Universidade Lusófona Research Center for Biosciences and Health Technologies, Campo Grande, 376, 1749-024 Lisboa, PortugaliMed.ULisboa, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lisbon, Av. Prof Gama Pinto, 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal<b>Background:</b> The professional abilities of graduate pharmacists have been associated with pharmacy undergraduates’ educational settings and features. This study aimed to perform a scoping review on how students’ learning outcomes are achieved, including learning assessment strategies, focusing on current pharmacy practice education. <b>Methods:</b> Relevant keywords, e.g., “pharmacy practice”, “(students or undergraduates)” and “outcomes” were browsed in Public/Publisher MEDLINE, Scientific Electronic Library Online, Directory of Open Access Journals, and other relevant databases for recently published sources (2018 and 2017). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria were followed to assure the scoping quality. All types of students’ learning outcomes were addressed for indexed publications in English, Portuguese or Spanish. Reviews, descriptive studies and commentaries were excluded. Study data are presented in tables comprising objectives, methods, number of participants and main research findings. <b>Results:</b> Overall, 100 studies were identified and 22 were selected. The selected studies were distributed into seven main topics: real practices (n = 9); active-learning strategies (n = 5); comparisons between different teaching pedagogies (n = 3); pharmacy curriculum (n = 2); and other evaluations (n = 3). <b>Conclusions:</b> Studies on pharmacy students’ learning outcomes are limited. Pharmacy undergraduates’ performance was dependent on the learning strategies and extension of syllabus implementation.https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4787/7/1/23pharmacy studentspharmacy pharmaceutical undergraduateslearning outcomesacademic performanceeducation assessmentpharmacy practiceactive-learninglearning methodologies
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carla Pires
Afonso Cavaco
spellingShingle Carla Pires
Afonso Cavaco
Scoping Pharmacy Students’ Learning Outcomes: Where Do We Stand?
Pharmacy
pharmacy students
pharmacy pharmaceutical undergraduates
learning outcomes
academic performance
education assessment
pharmacy practice
active-learning
learning methodologies
author_facet Carla Pires
Afonso Cavaco
author_sort Carla Pires
title Scoping Pharmacy Students’ Learning Outcomes: Where Do We Stand?
title_short Scoping Pharmacy Students’ Learning Outcomes: Where Do We Stand?
title_full Scoping Pharmacy Students’ Learning Outcomes: Where Do We Stand?
title_fullStr Scoping Pharmacy Students’ Learning Outcomes: Where Do We Stand?
title_full_unstemmed Scoping Pharmacy Students’ Learning Outcomes: Where Do We Stand?
title_sort scoping pharmacy students’ learning outcomes: where do we stand?
publisher MDPI AG
series Pharmacy
issn 2226-4787
publishDate 2019-02-01
description <b>Background:</b> The professional abilities of graduate pharmacists have been associated with pharmacy undergraduates’ educational settings and features. This study aimed to perform a scoping review on how students’ learning outcomes are achieved, including learning assessment strategies, focusing on current pharmacy practice education. <b>Methods:</b> Relevant keywords, e.g., “pharmacy practice”, “(students or undergraduates)” and “outcomes” were browsed in Public/Publisher MEDLINE, Scientific Electronic Library Online, Directory of Open Access Journals, and other relevant databases for recently published sources (2018 and 2017). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria were followed to assure the scoping quality. All types of students’ learning outcomes were addressed for indexed publications in English, Portuguese or Spanish. Reviews, descriptive studies and commentaries were excluded. Study data are presented in tables comprising objectives, methods, number of participants and main research findings. <b>Results:</b> Overall, 100 studies were identified and 22 were selected. The selected studies were distributed into seven main topics: real practices (n = 9); active-learning strategies (n = 5); comparisons between different teaching pedagogies (n = 3); pharmacy curriculum (n = 2); and other evaluations (n = 3). <b>Conclusions:</b> Studies on pharmacy students’ learning outcomes are limited. Pharmacy undergraduates’ performance was dependent on the learning strategies and extension of syllabus implementation.
topic pharmacy students
pharmacy pharmaceutical undergraduates
learning outcomes
academic performance
education assessment
pharmacy practice
active-learning
learning methodologies
url https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4787/7/1/23
work_keys_str_mv AT carlapires scopingpharmacystudentslearningoutcomeswheredowestand
AT afonsocavaco scopingpharmacystudentslearningoutcomeswheredowestand
_version_ 1725945281744207872