Reliable gains? Evidence for substantially underpowered designs in studies of working memory training transfer to fluid intelligence

In recent years, cognitive scientists and commercial interests (e.g., Fit Brains, Lumosity) have focused research attention and financial resources on cognitive tasks, especially working memory tasks, to explore and exploit possible transfer effects to general cognitive abilities, such as fluid inte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tim eBogg, Leanne eLasecki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01589/full
id doaj-a5109053402d4213b75686e43e9e9a20
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a5109053402d4213b75686e43e9e9a202020-11-25T00:52:52ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782015-01-01510.3389/fpsyg.2014.01589122469Reliable gains? Evidence for substantially underpowered designs in studies of working memory training transfer to fluid intelligenceTim eBogg0Leanne eLasecki1Wayne State UniversityWayne State UniversityIn recent years, cognitive scientists and commercial interests (e.g., Fit Brains, Lumosity) have focused research attention and financial resources on cognitive tasks, especially working memory tasks, to explore and exploit possible transfer effects to general cognitive abilities, such as fluid intelligence. The increased research attention has produced mixed findings, as well as contention about the disposition of the evidence base. To address this contention, J. Au and colleagues (2014; doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0699-x) recently conducted a meta-analysis of extant controlled experimental studies of n-back task training transfer effects on measures of fluid intelligence in healthy adults; the results of which showed a small training transfer effect. Using several approaches, the current review evaluated and re-analyzed the meta-analytic data for the presence of two different forms of small-study effects: 1) publication bias in the presence of low power and; 2) low power in the absence of publication bias. The results of these approaches showed no evidence of selection bias in the working memory training literature, but did show evidence of small-study effects related to low power in the absence of publication bias. While the effect size estimate identified by Au and colleagues provided the most precise estimate to date, it should be interpreted in the context of a uniformly low-powered base of evidence. The present work concludes with a brief set of considerations for assessing the adequacy of a body of research findings for the application of meta-analytic techniques.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01589/fullfluid intelligenceMeta-analysistransfer effectsstatistical powerCognitive training interventionsmall-study effects
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tim eBogg
Leanne eLasecki
spellingShingle Tim eBogg
Leanne eLasecki
Reliable gains? Evidence for substantially underpowered designs in studies of working memory training transfer to fluid intelligence
Frontiers in Psychology
fluid intelligence
Meta-analysis
transfer effects
statistical power
Cognitive training intervention
small-study effects
author_facet Tim eBogg
Leanne eLasecki
author_sort Tim eBogg
title Reliable gains? Evidence for substantially underpowered designs in studies of working memory training transfer to fluid intelligence
title_short Reliable gains? Evidence for substantially underpowered designs in studies of working memory training transfer to fluid intelligence
title_full Reliable gains? Evidence for substantially underpowered designs in studies of working memory training transfer to fluid intelligence
title_fullStr Reliable gains? Evidence for substantially underpowered designs in studies of working memory training transfer to fluid intelligence
title_full_unstemmed Reliable gains? Evidence for substantially underpowered designs in studies of working memory training transfer to fluid intelligence
title_sort reliable gains? evidence for substantially underpowered designs in studies of working memory training transfer to fluid intelligence
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2015-01-01
description In recent years, cognitive scientists and commercial interests (e.g., Fit Brains, Lumosity) have focused research attention and financial resources on cognitive tasks, especially working memory tasks, to explore and exploit possible transfer effects to general cognitive abilities, such as fluid intelligence. The increased research attention has produced mixed findings, as well as contention about the disposition of the evidence base. To address this contention, J. Au and colleagues (2014; doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0699-x) recently conducted a meta-analysis of extant controlled experimental studies of n-back task training transfer effects on measures of fluid intelligence in healthy adults; the results of which showed a small training transfer effect. Using several approaches, the current review evaluated and re-analyzed the meta-analytic data for the presence of two different forms of small-study effects: 1) publication bias in the presence of low power and; 2) low power in the absence of publication bias. The results of these approaches showed no evidence of selection bias in the working memory training literature, but did show evidence of small-study effects related to low power in the absence of publication bias. While the effect size estimate identified by Au and colleagues provided the most precise estimate to date, it should be interpreted in the context of a uniformly low-powered base of evidence. The present work concludes with a brief set of considerations for assessing the adequacy of a body of research findings for the application of meta-analytic techniques.
topic fluid intelligence
Meta-analysis
transfer effects
statistical power
Cognitive training intervention
small-study effects
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01589/full
work_keys_str_mv AT timebogg reliablegainsevidenceforsubstantiallyunderpowereddesignsinstudiesofworkingmemorytrainingtransfertofluidintelligence
AT leanneelasecki reliablegainsevidenceforsubstantiallyunderpowereddesignsinstudiesofworkingmemorytrainingtransfertofluidintelligence
_version_ 1725240503179411456