Multicompare Tests of the Performance of Different Metaheuristics in EEG Dipole Source Localization

We study the use of nonparametric multicompare statistical tests on the performance of simulated annealing (SA), genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO), and differential evolution (DE), when used for electroencephalographic (EEG) source localization. Such task can be posed as an o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Diana Irazú Escalona-Vargas, Ivan Lopez-Arevalo, David Gutiérrez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2014-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/524367
id doaj-a4ef57b106e8491db8e5ac80ed151d55
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a4ef57b106e8491db8e5ac80ed151d552020-11-25T02:30:15ZengHindawi LimitedThe Scientific World Journal2356-61401537-744X2014-01-01201410.1155/2014/524367524367Multicompare Tests of the Performance of Different Metaheuristics in EEG Dipole Source LocalizationDiana Irazú Escalona-Vargas0Ivan Lopez-Arevalo1David Gutiérrez2Information Technology Laboratory, Center for Research and Advanced Studies (Cinvestav), Ciudad Victoria, TAMPS 87130, MexicoInformation Technology Laboratory, Center for Research and Advanced Studies (Cinvestav), Ciudad Victoria, TAMPS 87130, MexicoBiomedical Signal Processing Laboratory, Center for Research and Advanced Studies (Cinvestav), Apodaca, NL 66600, MexicoWe study the use of nonparametric multicompare statistical tests on the performance of simulated annealing (SA), genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO), and differential evolution (DE), when used for electroencephalographic (EEG) source localization. Such task can be posed as an optimization problem for which the referred metaheuristic methods are well suited. Hence, we evaluate the localization’s performance in terms of metaheuristics’ operational parameters and for a fixed number of evaluations of the objective function. In this way, we are able to link the efficiency of the metaheuristics with a common measure of computational cost. Our results did not show significant differences in the metaheuristics’ performance for the case of single source localization. In case of localizing two correlated sources, we found that PSO (ring and tree topologies) and DE performed the worst, then they should not be considered in large-scale EEG source localization problems. Overall, the multicompare tests allowed to demonstrate the little effect that the selection of a particular metaheuristic and the variations in their operational parameters have in this optimization problem.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/524367
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Diana Irazú Escalona-Vargas
Ivan Lopez-Arevalo
David Gutiérrez
spellingShingle Diana Irazú Escalona-Vargas
Ivan Lopez-Arevalo
David Gutiérrez
Multicompare Tests of the Performance of Different Metaheuristics in EEG Dipole Source Localization
The Scientific World Journal
author_facet Diana Irazú Escalona-Vargas
Ivan Lopez-Arevalo
David Gutiérrez
author_sort Diana Irazú Escalona-Vargas
title Multicompare Tests of the Performance of Different Metaheuristics in EEG Dipole Source Localization
title_short Multicompare Tests of the Performance of Different Metaheuristics in EEG Dipole Source Localization
title_full Multicompare Tests of the Performance of Different Metaheuristics in EEG Dipole Source Localization
title_fullStr Multicompare Tests of the Performance of Different Metaheuristics in EEG Dipole Source Localization
title_full_unstemmed Multicompare Tests of the Performance of Different Metaheuristics in EEG Dipole Source Localization
title_sort multicompare tests of the performance of different metaheuristics in eeg dipole source localization
publisher Hindawi Limited
series The Scientific World Journal
issn 2356-6140
1537-744X
publishDate 2014-01-01
description We study the use of nonparametric multicompare statistical tests on the performance of simulated annealing (SA), genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO), and differential evolution (DE), when used for electroencephalographic (EEG) source localization. Such task can be posed as an optimization problem for which the referred metaheuristic methods are well suited. Hence, we evaluate the localization’s performance in terms of metaheuristics’ operational parameters and for a fixed number of evaluations of the objective function. In this way, we are able to link the efficiency of the metaheuristics with a common measure of computational cost. Our results did not show significant differences in the metaheuristics’ performance for the case of single source localization. In case of localizing two correlated sources, we found that PSO (ring and tree topologies) and DE performed the worst, then they should not be considered in large-scale EEG source localization problems. Overall, the multicompare tests allowed to demonstrate the little effect that the selection of a particular metaheuristic and the variations in their operational parameters have in this optimization problem.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/524367
work_keys_str_mv AT dianairazuescalonavargas multicomparetestsoftheperformanceofdifferentmetaheuristicsineegdipolesourcelocalization
AT ivanlopezarevalo multicomparetestsoftheperformanceofdifferentmetaheuristicsineegdipolesourcelocalization
AT davidgutierrez multicomparetestsoftheperformanceofdifferentmetaheuristicsineegdipolesourcelocalization
_version_ 1724829052360982528