Resolving conflicting objectives in the management of the Plastiras Lake: can we quantify beauty?

The possible water management of the Plastiras Lake, an artificial reservoir in central Greece, is examined. The lake and surrounding landscape are aesthetically degraded when the water level drops, and the requirement of maintaining a high quality of the scenery constitutes one of the several confl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Christofides, A. Efstratiadis, D. Koutsoyiannis, G.-F. Sargentis, K. Hadjibiros
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2005-01-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/9/507/2005/hess-9-507-2005.pdf
id doaj-a4eaa5208bcb42bca8d31c715fbb007f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a4eaa5208bcb42bca8d31c715fbb007f2020-11-24T21:11:09ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382005-01-0195507515Resolving conflicting objectives in the management of the Plastiras Lake: can we quantify beauty?A. ChristofidesA. EfstratiadisD. KoutsoyiannisG.-F. SargentisK. HadjibirosThe possible water management of the Plastiras Lake, an artificial reservoir in central Greece, is examined. The lake and surrounding landscape are aesthetically degraded when the water level drops, and the requirement of maintaining a high quality of the scenery constitutes one of the several conflicting water uses, the other ones being irrigation, water supply, and power production. This environmental water use, and, to a lesser extent, the requirement for adequate water quality, results in constraining the annual release. Thus, the allowed fluctuation of reservoir stage is not defined by the physical and technical characteristics of the reservoir, but by a multi-criteria decision, the three criteria being maximising water release, ensuring adequate water quality, and maintaining a high quality of the natural landscape. Each of these criteria is analyzed separately. The results are then put together in a multicriterion tableau, which helps understand the implications of the possible alternative decisions. Several conflict resolution methods are overviewed, namely willingness to pay, hedonic prices, and multi-criteria decision analysis. All these methods attempt to quantify non-quantifiable qualities, and it is concluded that they don't necessarily offer any advantage over merely making a choice based on understanding.http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/9/507/2005/hess-9-507-2005.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. Christofides
A. Efstratiadis
D. Koutsoyiannis
G.-F. Sargentis
K. Hadjibiros
spellingShingle A. Christofides
A. Efstratiadis
D. Koutsoyiannis
G.-F. Sargentis
K. Hadjibiros
Resolving conflicting objectives in the management of the Plastiras Lake: can we quantify beauty?
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
author_facet A. Christofides
A. Efstratiadis
D. Koutsoyiannis
G.-F. Sargentis
K. Hadjibiros
author_sort A. Christofides
title Resolving conflicting objectives in the management of the Plastiras Lake: can we quantify beauty?
title_short Resolving conflicting objectives in the management of the Plastiras Lake: can we quantify beauty?
title_full Resolving conflicting objectives in the management of the Plastiras Lake: can we quantify beauty?
title_fullStr Resolving conflicting objectives in the management of the Plastiras Lake: can we quantify beauty?
title_full_unstemmed Resolving conflicting objectives in the management of the Plastiras Lake: can we quantify beauty?
title_sort resolving conflicting objectives in the management of the plastiras lake: can we quantify beauty?
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
publishDate 2005-01-01
description The possible water management of the Plastiras Lake, an artificial reservoir in central Greece, is examined. The lake and surrounding landscape are aesthetically degraded when the water level drops, and the requirement of maintaining a high quality of the scenery constitutes one of the several conflicting water uses, the other ones being irrigation, water supply, and power production. This environmental water use, and, to a lesser extent, the requirement for adequate water quality, results in constraining the annual release. Thus, the allowed fluctuation of reservoir stage is not defined by the physical and technical characteristics of the reservoir, but by a multi-criteria decision, the three criteria being maximising water release, ensuring adequate water quality, and maintaining a high quality of the natural landscape. Each of these criteria is analyzed separately. The results are then put together in a multicriterion tableau, which helps understand the implications of the possible alternative decisions. Several conflict resolution methods are overviewed, namely willingness to pay, hedonic prices, and multi-criteria decision analysis. All these methods attempt to quantify non-quantifiable qualities, and it is concluded that they don't necessarily offer any advantage over merely making a choice based on understanding.
url http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/9/507/2005/hess-9-507-2005.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT achristofides resolvingconflictingobjectivesinthemanagementoftheplastiraslakecanwequantifybeauty
AT aefstratiadis resolvingconflictingobjectivesinthemanagementoftheplastiraslakecanwequantifybeauty
AT dkoutsoyiannis resolvingconflictingobjectivesinthemanagementoftheplastiraslakecanwequantifybeauty
AT gfsargentis resolvingconflictingobjectivesinthemanagementoftheplastiraslakecanwequantifybeauty
AT khadjibiros resolvingconflictingobjectivesinthemanagementoftheplastiraslakecanwequantifybeauty
_version_ 1716754297353404416