Commission v Belgium and Its Dossier de Procédure: A New Resource for Socio-legal Research

(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2021 6(2), 891-901 | Article | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Case 149/79 Commission v Belgium. - III. The context/case dialectic. - IV. Findings on legal reasoning to strengthen doctrinal research. - V. Procedural...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aruna Michiels
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu) 2021-09-01
Series:European Papers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/e-journal/commission-v-belgium-and-its-dossier-de-procedure
id doaj-a4c4a247ec0640cfb8b093aa31388130
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a4c4a247ec0640cfb8b093aa313881302021-09-22T13:12:23ZengEuropean Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu)European Papers2499-82492021-09-012021 6289190110.15166/2499-8249/502Commission v Belgium and Its Dossier de Procédure: A New Resource for Socio-legal ResearchAruna Michiels0European University Institute(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2021 6(2), 891-901 | Article | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Case 149/79 Commission v Belgium. - III. The context/case dialectic. - IV. Findings on legal reasoning to strengthen doctrinal research. - V. Procedural practice. - VI. Insight into actors and institutions. - VII. Concluding remarks. | (Abstract) In its final decision of 26 May 1982, the Court of Justice established which of two competing interpretations of the public service exception in art. 48(4) of the EEC Treaty (currently art. 45 TFEU) would define the ambit of free movement of workers to this day. Out of nine Member States, four were actively involved in the proceedings, showing the controversy and importance surrounding the implementation of free movement in the public service of domestic legal orders in this early stage of European integration. Findings from an analysis of the dossier for Commission v Belgium were gathered in reports drafted as part of a fascinating project on the "Court of Justice in the Archives". This Article showcases the interconnectedness of actors, institutions and procedure that emerges from the dossier. The legal reasoning underpinning the case is re-evaluated on the basis of submissions and the evidence contained in the dossier. The illustrations selected for this Article demonstrate how the dossier can be deployed as a new instrument to further socio-legal and legal research on the jurisprudence and practice of the European Community.https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/e-journal/commission-v-belgium-and-its-dossier-de-procedurefree movement of workersderogationsemployment in the public serviceinfringement procedurelegal and socio-legal research methodsarchival resources
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aruna Michiels
spellingShingle Aruna Michiels
Commission v Belgium and Its Dossier de Procédure: A New Resource for Socio-legal Research
European Papers
free movement of workers
derogations
employment in the public service
infringement procedure
legal and socio-legal research methods
archival resources
author_facet Aruna Michiels
author_sort Aruna Michiels
title Commission v Belgium and Its Dossier de Procédure: A New Resource for Socio-legal Research
title_short Commission v Belgium and Its Dossier de Procédure: A New Resource for Socio-legal Research
title_full Commission v Belgium and Its Dossier de Procédure: A New Resource for Socio-legal Research
title_fullStr Commission v Belgium and Its Dossier de Procédure: A New Resource for Socio-legal Research
title_full_unstemmed Commission v Belgium and Its Dossier de Procédure: A New Resource for Socio-legal Research
title_sort commission v belgium and its dossier de procédure: a new resource for socio-legal research
publisher European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu)
series European Papers
issn 2499-8249
publishDate 2021-09-01
description (Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2021 6(2), 891-901 | Article | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Case 149/79 Commission v Belgium. - III. The context/case dialectic. - IV. Findings on legal reasoning to strengthen doctrinal research. - V. Procedural practice. - VI. Insight into actors and institutions. - VII. Concluding remarks. | (Abstract) In its final decision of 26 May 1982, the Court of Justice established which of two competing interpretations of the public service exception in art. 48(4) of the EEC Treaty (currently art. 45 TFEU) would define the ambit of free movement of workers to this day. Out of nine Member States, four were actively involved in the proceedings, showing the controversy and importance surrounding the implementation of free movement in the public service of domestic legal orders in this early stage of European integration. Findings from an analysis of the dossier for Commission v Belgium were gathered in reports drafted as part of a fascinating project on the "Court of Justice in the Archives". This Article showcases the interconnectedness of actors, institutions and procedure that emerges from the dossier. The legal reasoning underpinning the case is re-evaluated on the basis of submissions and the evidence contained in the dossier. The illustrations selected for this Article demonstrate how the dossier can be deployed as a new instrument to further socio-legal and legal research on the jurisprudence and practice of the European Community.
topic free movement of workers
derogations
employment in the public service
infringement procedure
legal and socio-legal research methods
archival resources
url https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/e-journal/commission-v-belgium-and-its-dossier-de-procedure
work_keys_str_mv AT arunamichiels commissionvbelgiumanditsdossierdeprocedureanewresourceforsociolegalresearch
_version_ 1717371425297268736