Use, Utilization, Productivity and Fuel Consumption of Purpose-Built and Excavator-Based Harvesters and Processors in Italy
Annual use, utilization, productivity and fuel consumption of three purpose-built and three excavator-based harvesters and processors were monitored for one work year. All machines were owned and operated by private contractors and were representative of the Italian machine fleet. Despite challengin...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2017-12-01
|
Series: | Forests |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/8/12/485 |
id |
doaj-a4bcca9bb62642278e68a79df6309c03 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a4bcca9bb62642278e68a79df6309c032020-11-25T00:09:36ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072017-12-0181248510.3390/f8120485f8120485Use, Utilization, Productivity and Fuel Consumption of Purpose-Built and Excavator-Based Harvesters and Processors in ItalyNatascia Magagnotti0Luigi Pari1Raffaele Spinelli2CNR Ivalsa, Via Madonna del Piano 10, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino (FI), ItalyCRA-ING Via della Pascolare 16, I-00015 Monterotondo Scalo (Roma), ItalyCNR Ivalsa, Via Madonna del Piano 10, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino (FI), ItalyAnnual use, utilization, productivity and fuel consumption of three purpose-built and three excavator-based harvesters and processors were monitored for one work year. All machines were owned and operated by private contractors and were representative of the Italian machine fleet. Despite challenging mountain terrain, annual use ranged from 675 to 1525 h per year, and production from 3200 to 27,400 m3 per year. Productivity was lower for excavator-based units, and for machines working under a yarder, due to limited yarder capacity. Purpose-built machines offered higher utilization, productivity and fuel efficiency compared with excavator-based machines. Fuel consumption per m3 was 2.4 times greater for excavator-based units, compared with purpose-built machines. Excavator-based units offered financial and technical advantages, but their long-term market success will likely depend on future improvements in fuel efficiency, in the face of increasing fuel prices.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/8/12/485efficiencycontractorsbenchmarklogging |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Natascia Magagnotti Luigi Pari Raffaele Spinelli |
spellingShingle |
Natascia Magagnotti Luigi Pari Raffaele Spinelli Use, Utilization, Productivity and Fuel Consumption of Purpose-Built and Excavator-Based Harvesters and Processors in Italy Forests efficiency contractors benchmark logging |
author_facet |
Natascia Magagnotti Luigi Pari Raffaele Spinelli |
author_sort |
Natascia Magagnotti |
title |
Use, Utilization, Productivity and Fuel Consumption of Purpose-Built and Excavator-Based Harvesters and Processors in Italy |
title_short |
Use, Utilization, Productivity and Fuel Consumption of Purpose-Built and Excavator-Based Harvesters and Processors in Italy |
title_full |
Use, Utilization, Productivity and Fuel Consumption of Purpose-Built and Excavator-Based Harvesters and Processors in Italy |
title_fullStr |
Use, Utilization, Productivity and Fuel Consumption of Purpose-Built and Excavator-Based Harvesters and Processors in Italy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Use, Utilization, Productivity and Fuel Consumption of Purpose-Built and Excavator-Based Harvesters and Processors in Italy |
title_sort |
use, utilization, productivity and fuel consumption of purpose-built and excavator-based harvesters and processors in italy |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Forests |
issn |
1999-4907 |
publishDate |
2017-12-01 |
description |
Annual use, utilization, productivity and fuel consumption of three purpose-built and three excavator-based harvesters and processors were monitored for one work year. All machines were owned and operated by private contractors and were representative of the Italian machine fleet. Despite challenging mountain terrain, annual use ranged from 675 to 1525 h per year, and production from 3200 to 27,400 m3 per year. Productivity was lower for excavator-based units, and for machines working under a yarder, due to limited yarder capacity. Purpose-built machines offered higher utilization, productivity and fuel efficiency compared with excavator-based machines. Fuel consumption per m3 was 2.4 times greater for excavator-based units, compared with purpose-built machines. Excavator-based units offered financial and technical advantages, but their long-term market success will likely depend on future improvements in fuel efficiency, in the face of increasing fuel prices. |
topic |
efficiency contractors benchmark logging |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/8/12/485 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT natasciamagagnotti useutilizationproductivityandfuelconsumptionofpurposebuiltandexcavatorbasedharvestersandprocessorsinitaly AT luigipari useutilizationproductivityandfuelconsumptionofpurposebuiltandexcavatorbasedharvestersandprocessorsinitaly AT raffaelespinelli useutilizationproductivityandfuelconsumptionofpurposebuiltandexcavatorbasedharvestersandprocessorsinitaly |
_version_ |
1725410878606540800 |