Use, Utilization, Productivity and Fuel Consumption of Purpose-Built and Excavator-Based Harvesters and Processors in Italy

Annual use, utilization, productivity and fuel consumption of three purpose-built and three excavator-based harvesters and processors were monitored for one work year. All machines were owned and operated by private contractors and were representative of the Italian machine fleet. Despite challengin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Natascia Magagnotti, Luigi Pari, Raffaele Spinelli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-12-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/8/12/485
id doaj-a4bcca9bb62642278e68a79df6309c03
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a4bcca9bb62642278e68a79df6309c032020-11-25T00:09:36ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072017-12-0181248510.3390/f8120485f8120485Use, Utilization, Productivity and Fuel Consumption of Purpose-Built and Excavator-Based Harvesters and Processors in ItalyNatascia Magagnotti0Luigi Pari1Raffaele Spinelli2CNR Ivalsa, Via Madonna del Piano 10, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino (FI), ItalyCRA-ING Via della Pascolare 16, I-00015 Monterotondo Scalo (Roma), ItalyCNR Ivalsa, Via Madonna del Piano 10, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino (FI), ItalyAnnual use, utilization, productivity and fuel consumption of three purpose-built and three excavator-based harvesters and processors were monitored for one work year. All machines were owned and operated by private contractors and were representative of the Italian machine fleet. Despite challenging mountain terrain, annual use ranged from 675 to 1525 h per year, and production from 3200 to 27,400 m3 per year. Productivity was lower for excavator-based units, and for machines working under a yarder, due to limited yarder capacity. Purpose-built machines offered higher utilization, productivity and fuel efficiency compared with excavator-based machines. Fuel consumption per m3 was 2.4 times greater for excavator-based units, compared with purpose-built machines. Excavator-based units offered financial and technical advantages, but their long-term market success will likely depend on future improvements in fuel efficiency, in the face of increasing fuel prices.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/8/12/485efficiencycontractorsbenchmarklogging
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Natascia Magagnotti
Luigi Pari
Raffaele Spinelli
spellingShingle Natascia Magagnotti
Luigi Pari
Raffaele Spinelli
Use, Utilization, Productivity and Fuel Consumption of Purpose-Built and Excavator-Based Harvesters and Processors in Italy
Forests
efficiency
contractors
benchmark
logging
author_facet Natascia Magagnotti
Luigi Pari
Raffaele Spinelli
author_sort Natascia Magagnotti
title Use, Utilization, Productivity and Fuel Consumption of Purpose-Built and Excavator-Based Harvesters and Processors in Italy
title_short Use, Utilization, Productivity and Fuel Consumption of Purpose-Built and Excavator-Based Harvesters and Processors in Italy
title_full Use, Utilization, Productivity and Fuel Consumption of Purpose-Built and Excavator-Based Harvesters and Processors in Italy
title_fullStr Use, Utilization, Productivity and Fuel Consumption of Purpose-Built and Excavator-Based Harvesters and Processors in Italy
title_full_unstemmed Use, Utilization, Productivity and Fuel Consumption of Purpose-Built and Excavator-Based Harvesters and Processors in Italy
title_sort use, utilization, productivity and fuel consumption of purpose-built and excavator-based harvesters and processors in italy
publisher MDPI AG
series Forests
issn 1999-4907
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Annual use, utilization, productivity and fuel consumption of three purpose-built and three excavator-based harvesters and processors were monitored for one work year. All machines were owned and operated by private contractors and were representative of the Italian machine fleet. Despite challenging mountain terrain, annual use ranged from 675 to 1525 h per year, and production from 3200 to 27,400 m3 per year. Productivity was lower for excavator-based units, and for machines working under a yarder, due to limited yarder capacity. Purpose-built machines offered higher utilization, productivity and fuel efficiency compared with excavator-based machines. Fuel consumption per m3 was 2.4 times greater for excavator-based units, compared with purpose-built machines. Excavator-based units offered financial and technical advantages, but their long-term market success will likely depend on future improvements in fuel efficiency, in the face of increasing fuel prices.
topic efficiency
contractors
benchmark
logging
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/8/12/485
work_keys_str_mv AT natasciamagagnotti useutilizationproductivityandfuelconsumptionofpurposebuiltandexcavatorbasedharvestersandprocessorsinitaly
AT luigipari useutilizationproductivityandfuelconsumptionofpurposebuiltandexcavatorbasedharvestersandprocessorsinitaly
AT raffaelespinelli useutilizationproductivityandfuelconsumptionofpurposebuiltandexcavatorbasedharvestersandprocessorsinitaly
_version_ 1725410878606540800