Investigation of Occult Hip Fractures: The Use of CT and MRI

Aim. At present there is no data looking at modern multislice computerised tomography (CT) in the investigation of occult hip fracture. The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the reports of patients sent for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or CT with negative radiographs and a clinica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. K. Gill, J. Smith, R. Fox, T. J. S. Chesser
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2013-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/830319
id doaj-a4b614904cce4b77b3b7e6baadee530d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a4b614904cce4b77b3b7e6baadee530d2020-11-25T00:49:46ZengHindawi LimitedThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2013-01-01201310.1155/2013/830319830319Investigation of Occult Hip Fractures: The Use of CT and MRIS. K. Gill0J. Smith1R. Fox2T. J. S. Chesser3Trauma and Orthopaedic Department, Frenchay Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Frenchay Park Road, Bristol BS16 1LE, UKTrauma and Orthopaedic Department, Frenchay Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Frenchay Park Road, Bristol BS16 1LE, UKTrauma and Orthopaedic Department, Frenchay Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Frenchay Park Road, Bristol BS16 1LE, UKTrauma and Orthopaedic Department, Frenchay Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Frenchay Park Road, Bristol BS16 1LE, UKAim. At present there is no data looking at modern multislice computerised tomography (CT) in the investigation of occult hip fracture. The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the reports of patients sent for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or CT with negative radiographs and a clinical suspicion of a fractured neck of femur. Methods. All patients presenting to the hospital with a clinical suspicion of a hip fracture but initial negative radiographs over a three-year period were included. Patients were either investigated with an MRI scan or CT scan. The presence of a fracture, the requirement for surgery, and any further requirement for imaging were recorded. Results. Over three years 92 patients were included of which 61 were referred for a CT and 31 for an MRI. Thirty-four patients were found to have a fracture. Of these, MRI picked up a fracture in 36% and CT in 38% of referrals. Discussion. Up to 10% of proximal femur fractures may be missed on initial radiographs. Current guidelines state patients should be offered MRI if hip fracture is suspected despite negative hip radiographs. Our findings show that modern multislice CT may be comparable with MRI for detecting occult fracture.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/830319
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author S. K. Gill
J. Smith
R. Fox
T. J. S. Chesser
spellingShingle S. K. Gill
J. Smith
R. Fox
T. J. S. Chesser
Investigation of Occult Hip Fractures: The Use of CT and MRI
The Scientific World Journal
author_facet S. K. Gill
J. Smith
R. Fox
T. J. S. Chesser
author_sort S. K. Gill
title Investigation of Occult Hip Fractures: The Use of CT and MRI
title_short Investigation of Occult Hip Fractures: The Use of CT and MRI
title_full Investigation of Occult Hip Fractures: The Use of CT and MRI
title_fullStr Investigation of Occult Hip Fractures: The Use of CT and MRI
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of Occult Hip Fractures: The Use of CT and MRI
title_sort investigation of occult hip fractures: the use of ct and mri
publisher Hindawi Limited
series The Scientific World Journal
issn 1537-744X
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Aim. At present there is no data looking at modern multislice computerised tomography (CT) in the investigation of occult hip fracture. The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the reports of patients sent for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or CT with negative radiographs and a clinical suspicion of a fractured neck of femur. Methods. All patients presenting to the hospital with a clinical suspicion of a hip fracture but initial negative radiographs over a three-year period were included. Patients were either investigated with an MRI scan or CT scan. The presence of a fracture, the requirement for surgery, and any further requirement for imaging were recorded. Results. Over three years 92 patients were included of which 61 were referred for a CT and 31 for an MRI. Thirty-four patients were found to have a fracture. Of these, MRI picked up a fracture in 36% and CT in 38% of referrals. Discussion. Up to 10% of proximal femur fractures may be missed on initial radiographs. Current guidelines state patients should be offered MRI if hip fracture is suspected despite negative hip radiographs. Our findings show that modern multislice CT may be comparable with MRI for detecting occult fracture.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/830319
work_keys_str_mv AT skgill investigationofocculthipfracturestheuseofctandmri
AT jsmith investigationofocculthipfracturestheuseofctandmri
AT rfox investigationofocculthipfracturestheuseofctandmri
AT tjschesser investigationofocculthipfracturestheuseofctandmri
_version_ 1725251289787400192