Improved reconstruction of in silico gene regulatory networks by integrating knockout and perturbation data.

We performed computational reconstruction of the in silico gene regulatory networks in the DREAM3 Challenges. Our task was to learn the networks from two types of data, namely gene expression profiles in deletion strains (the 'deletion data') and time series trajectories of gene expression...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kevin Y Yip, Roger P Alexander, Koon-Kiu Yan, Mark Gerstein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2010-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2811182?pdf=render
id doaj-a4afca4ca04d479ab653651f6cece073
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a4afca4ca04d479ab653651f6cece0732020-11-25T02:39:47ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032010-01-0151e812110.1371/journal.pone.0008121Improved reconstruction of in silico gene regulatory networks by integrating knockout and perturbation data.Kevin Y YipRoger P AlexanderKoon-Kiu YanMark GersteinWe performed computational reconstruction of the in silico gene regulatory networks in the DREAM3 Challenges. Our task was to learn the networks from two types of data, namely gene expression profiles in deletion strains (the 'deletion data') and time series trajectories of gene expression after some initial perturbation (the 'perturbation data'). In the course of developing the prediction method, we observed that the two types of data contained different and complementary information about the underlying network. In particular, deletion data allow for the detection of direct regulatory activities with strong responses upon the deletion of the regulator while perturbation data provide richer information for the identification of weaker and more complex types of regulation. We applied different techniques to learn the regulation from the two types of data. For deletion data, we learned a noise model to distinguish real signals from random fluctuations using an iterative method. For perturbation data, we used differential equations to model the change of expression levels of a gene along the trajectories due to the regulation of other genes. We tried different models, and combined their predictions. The final predictions were obtained by merging the results from the two types of data. A comparison with the actual regulatory networks suggests that our approach is effective for networks with a range of different sizes. The success of the approach demonstrates the importance of integrating heterogeneous data in network reconstruction.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2811182?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kevin Y Yip
Roger P Alexander
Koon-Kiu Yan
Mark Gerstein
spellingShingle Kevin Y Yip
Roger P Alexander
Koon-Kiu Yan
Mark Gerstein
Improved reconstruction of in silico gene regulatory networks by integrating knockout and perturbation data.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Kevin Y Yip
Roger P Alexander
Koon-Kiu Yan
Mark Gerstein
author_sort Kevin Y Yip
title Improved reconstruction of in silico gene regulatory networks by integrating knockout and perturbation data.
title_short Improved reconstruction of in silico gene regulatory networks by integrating knockout and perturbation data.
title_full Improved reconstruction of in silico gene regulatory networks by integrating knockout and perturbation data.
title_fullStr Improved reconstruction of in silico gene regulatory networks by integrating knockout and perturbation data.
title_full_unstemmed Improved reconstruction of in silico gene regulatory networks by integrating knockout and perturbation data.
title_sort improved reconstruction of in silico gene regulatory networks by integrating knockout and perturbation data.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2010-01-01
description We performed computational reconstruction of the in silico gene regulatory networks in the DREAM3 Challenges. Our task was to learn the networks from two types of data, namely gene expression profiles in deletion strains (the 'deletion data') and time series trajectories of gene expression after some initial perturbation (the 'perturbation data'). In the course of developing the prediction method, we observed that the two types of data contained different and complementary information about the underlying network. In particular, deletion data allow for the detection of direct regulatory activities with strong responses upon the deletion of the regulator while perturbation data provide richer information for the identification of weaker and more complex types of regulation. We applied different techniques to learn the regulation from the two types of data. For deletion data, we learned a noise model to distinguish real signals from random fluctuations using an iterative method. For perturbation data, we used differential equations to model the change of expression levels of a gene along the trajectories due to the regulation of other genes. We tried different models, and combined their predictions. The final predictions were obtained by merging the results from the two types of data. A comparison with the actual regulatory networks suggests that our approach is effective for networks with a range of different sizes. The success of the approach demonstrates the importance of integrating heterogeneous data in network reconstruction.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2811182?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT kevinyyip improvedreconstructionofinsilicogeneregulatorynetworksbyintegratingknockoutandperturbationdata
AT rogerpalexander improvedreconstructionofinsilicogeneregulatorynetworksbyintegratingknockoutandperturbationdata
AT koonkiuyan improvedreconstructionofinsilicogeneregulatorynetworksbyintegratingknockoutandperturbationdata
AT markgerstein improvedreconstructionofinsilicogeneregulatorynetworksbyintegratingknockoutandperturbationdata
_version_ 1724784764525740032