Borders and Walls Made of Privileges? Urban Communities and the Rivalry in Drapery in the Surroundings of Ypres during the 14th Century

This article deals with several conflicts between Flemish cities in the fourteenth century that concerned export-oriented drapery. The focus is made on the contradictions between one of the powerful Flemish cities, Ypres, and two of the smaller neighbouring towns, the monastic town of Poperinge and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anna Aleksandrovna Mayzlish
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Ural Federal University Press 2020-12-01
Series:Известия Уральского федерального университета. Серия 2: Гуманитарные науки
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.urfu.ru/index.php/Izvestia2/article/view/4852
id doaj-a4aaa8a92bf24404ace4686adeec7612
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a4aaa8a92bf24404ace4686adeec76122021-01-08T03:58:03ZrusUral Federal University PressИзвестия Уральского федерального университета. Серия 2: Гуманитарные науки2227-22832587-69292020-12-01224(202)849610.15826/izv2.2020.22.4.0643751Borders and Walls Made of Privileges? Urban Communities and the Rivalry in Drapery in the Surroundings of Ypres during the 14th CenturyAnna Aleksandrovna Mayzlish0Институт всеобщей истории РАН, МоскваThis article deals with several conflicts between Flemish cities in the fourteenth century that concerned export-oriented drapery. The focus is made on the contradictions between one of the powerful Flemish cities, Ypres, and two of the smaller neighbouring towns, the monastic town of Poperinge and Langemark that produced drapery resembling that manufactured in Ypres. The author also draws a comparison with a similar conflict between Saint-Omer and the monastic town of Arques in the county of Artois. The study of these contradictions is mostly based on documental sources and gives an opportunity to find out what measures the cities resorted to in order to protect the well-being of their artisans and drapers. For example, Ypres and Saint-Omer obtained privileges over their neighbouring regions with monopoly rights to produce cloth meant for export; their rivals (Langemark, Poperinge) made attempts to get excluded from such “monopolies”; the cities in question also used legal methods of regulation (arbitrage, appeals to supreme courts) and sometimes employed force to convince smaller towns to observe their “monopoly”, especially during revolts. Additionally, the author defines various forces that took part in the process of balancing the interests of the rival cities and towns: the count, the lords of the towns, urban authorities, supreme courts (the Council of Flanders, the Parliament of Paris), and deans of the craft guilds of the cities. The measures used by the rival towns often brought no durable results, but the search of means to protect their interests in long-time conflicts itself shows the high level of self-organisation reflected in what urban authorities, city craft-guilds, and the urban communities did.https://journals.urfu.ru/index.php/Izvestia2/article/view/4852городская историясукноделиеремесленные объединенияконфликтысудебные процессыфландрияипрпоперингелангемаркxiv век
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anna Aleksandrovna Mayzlish
spellingShingle Anna Aleksandrovna Mayzlish
Borders and Walls Made of Privileges? Urban Communities and the Rivalry in Drapery in the Surroundings of Ypres during the 14th Century
Известия Уральского федерального университета. Серия 2: Гуманитарные науки
городская история
сукноделие
ремесленные объединения
конфликты
судебные процессы
фландрия
ипр
поперинге
лангемарк
xiv век
author_facet Anna Aleksandrovna Mayzlish
author_sort Anna Aleksandrovna Mayzlish
title Borders and Walls Made of Privileges? Urban Communities and the Rivalry in Drapery in the Surroundings of Ypres during the 14th Century
title_short Borders and Walls Made of Privileges? Urban Communities and the Rivalry in Drapery in the Surroundings of Ypres during the 14th Century
title_full Borders and Walls Made of Privileges? Urban Communities and the Rivalry in Drapery in the Surroundings of Ypres during the 14th Century
title_fullStr Borders and Walls Made of Privileges? Urban Communities and the Rivalry in Drapery in the Surroundings of Ypres during the 14th Century
title_full_unstemmed Borders and Walls Made of Privileges? Urban Communities and the Rivalry in Drapery in the Surroundings of Ypres during the 14th Century
title_sort borders and walls made of privileges? urban communities and the rivalry in drapery in the surroundings of ypres during the 14th century
publisher Ural Federal University Press
series Известия Уральского федерального университета. Серия 2: Гуманитарные науки
issn 2227-2283
2587-6929
publishDate 2020-12-01
description This article deals with several conflicts between Flemish cities in the fourteenth century that concerned export-oriented drapery. The focus is made on the contradictions between one of the powerful Flemish cities, Ypres, and two of the smaller neighbouring towns, the monastic town of Poperinge and Langemark that produced drapery resembling that manufactured in Ypres. The author also draws a comparison with a similar conflict between Saint-Omer and the monastic town of Arques in the county of Artois. The study of these contradictions is mostly based on documental sources and gives an opportunity to find out what measures the cities resorted to in order to protect the well-being of their artisans and drapers. For example, Ypres and Saint-Omer obtained privileges over their neighbouring regions with monopoly rights to produce cloth meant for export; their rivals (Langemark, Poperinge) made attempts to get excluded from such “monopolies”; the cities in question also used legal methods of regulation (arbitrage, appeals to supreme courts) and sometimes employed force to convince smaller towns to observe their “monopoly”, especially during revolts. Additionally, the author defines various forces that took part in the process of balancing the interests of the rival cities and towns: the count, the lords of the towns, urban authorities, supreme courts (the Council of Flanders, the Parliament of Paris), and deans of the craft guilds of the cities. The measures used by the rival towns often brought no durable results, but the search of means to protect their interests in long-time conflicts itself shows the high level of self-organisation reflected in what urban authorities, city craft-guilds, and the urban communities did.
topic городская история
сукноделие
ремесленные объединения
конфликты
судебные процессы
фландрия
ипр
поперинге
лангемарк
xiv век
url https://journals.urfu.ru/index.php/Izvestia2/article/view/4852
work_keys_str_mv AT annaaleksandrovnamayzlish bordersandwallsmadeofprivilegesurbancommunitiesandtherivalryindraperyinthesurroundingsofypresduringthe14thcentury
_version_ 1724345256285044736