Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Ligustrazine in the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Objective. To systematically review the efficacy and safety of Ligustrazine in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Methods. The electronic literature databases (PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang database, and VIP) were retrieved through a computer to find out the randomized controlled...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaozheng Wu, Wen Li, Zhenliang Luo, Yunzhi Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2020-01-01
Series:Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2416132
id doaj-a4921e6edb114e7f9e2903b78de488ca
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a4921e6edb114e7f9e2903b78de488ca2020-11-25T04:03:50ZengHindawi LimitedEvidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine1741-427X1741-42882020-01-01202010.1155/2020/24161322416132Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Ligustrazine in the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisXiaozheng Wu0Wen Li1Zhenliang Luo2Yunzhi Chen3Department of Preclinical Medicine, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang 510025, ChinaDepartment of Preclinical Medicine, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang 510025, ChinaDepartment of Preclinical Medicine, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang 510025, ChinaDepartment of Preclinical Medicine, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang 510025, ChinaObjective. To systematically review the efficacy and safety of Ligustrazine in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Methods. The electronic literature databases (PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang database, and VIP) were retrieved through a computer to find out the randomized controlled trials (RCT) of Ligustrazine in the treatment of IPF according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria screening test. Cochrane’s bias risk table was also used to evaluate the quality of the study and to extract effective data. RevMan 5.3 was used for statistical analysis. Results. A total of 7 RCTs (a total of 366 patients, including 196 in experimental and 170 in control group). Compared with the control group, Ligustrazine could improve the clinical symptoms ([OR] = 2.20, 95% CI [1.40, 3.46], P=0.0006), lung function (VC % [MD] = 3.92, 95% CI [0.68, 7.17], P=0.02), (TLC% [MD] = 4.94, 95% CI [0.37, 9.52], P=0.03), the pulmonary diffusion function (DLCO % [MD] = 9.12, 95% CI [5.70, 12.55], P<0.00001), and arterial blood gas analysis (PaO2 [MD] = 7.11, 95% CI [1.96, 12.25], P=0.007) (PaCO2 [MD] = −2.42, 95% CI [−4.36, −0.49], P=0.01) of IPF patients, respectively. However, FEV1/FVC % ([MD] = 9.37, 95% CI [−1.23, 19.97], P=0.08) and adverse reactions ([MD] = 0.35, 95% CI [0.02, 5.36], P=0.45) were not significantly improved. Conclusion. Ligustrazine has certain clinical efficacy in the treatment of IPF, but the safety of applying it and the adverse reactions need to be further analyzed and determined. It can be considered as a new alternative and complementary medicine to be promoted and recommended for use in medical units in various countries in the world and it solved the difficult problem of conventional drug treatment of IPF; therefore, more research strength can be put in the treatment of the pathological mechanism of IPF for further exploration. The study was registered under registration number CRD42020193626.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2416132
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xiaozheng Wu
Wen Li
Zhenliang Luo
Yunzhi Chen
spellingShingle Xiaozheng Wu
Wen Li
Zhenliang Luo
Yunzhi Chen
Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Ligustrazine in the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
author_facet Xiaozheng Wu
Wen Li
Zhenliang Luo
Yunzhi Chen
author_sort Xiaozheng Wu
title Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Ligustrazine in the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
title_short Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Ligustrazine in the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
title_full Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Ligustrazine in the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
title_fullStr Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Ligustrazine in the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
title_full_unstemmed Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Ligustrazine in the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
title_sort meta-analysis of clinical efficacy and safety of ligustrazine in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
issn 1741-427X
1741-4288
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Objective. To systematically review the efficacy and safety of Ligustrazine in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Methods. The electronic literature databases (PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang database, and VIP) were retrieved through a computer to find out the randomized controlled trials (RCT) of Ligustrazine in the treatment of IPF according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria screening test. Cochrane’s bias risk table was also used to evaluate the quality of the study and to extract effective data. RevMan 5.3 was used for statistical analysis. Results. A total of 7 RCTs (a total of 366 patients, including 196 in experimental and 170 in control group). Compared with the control group, Ligustrazine could improve the clinical symptoms ([OR] = 2.20, 95% CI [1.40, 3.46], P=0.0006), lung function (VC % [MD] = 3.92, 95% CI [0.68, 7.17], P=0.02), (TLC% [MD] = 4.94, 95% CI [0.37, 9.52], P=0.03), the pulmonary diffusion function (DLCO % [MD] = 9.12, 95% CI [5.70, 12.55], P<0.00001), and arterial blood gas analysis (PaO2 [MD] = 7.11, 95% CI [1.96, 12.25], P=0.007) (PaCO2 [MD] = −2.42, 95% CI [−4.36, −0.49], P=0.01) of IPF patients, respectively. However, FEV1/FVC % ([MD] = 9.37, 95% CI [−1.23, 19.97], P=0.08) and adverse reactions ([MD] = 0.35, 95% CI [0.02, 5.36], P=0.45) were not significantly improved. Conclusion. Ligustrazine has certain clinical efficacy in the treatment of IPF, but the safety of applying it and the adverse reactions need to be further analyzed and determined. It can be considered as a new alternative and complementary medicine to be promoted and recommended for use in medical units in various countries in the world and it solved the difficult problem of conventional drug treatment of IPF; therefore, more research strength can be put in the treatment of the pathological mechanism of IPF for further exploration. The study was registered under registration number CRD42020193626.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2416132
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaozhengwu metaanalysisofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofligustrazineinthetreatmentofidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosis
AT wenli metaanalysisofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofligustrazineinthetreatmentofidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosis
AT zhenliangluo metaanalysisofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofligustrazineinthetreatmentofidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosis
AT yunzhichen metaanalysisofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofligustrazineinthetreatmentofidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosis
_version_ 1715056962737012736