Mobile Phone Use Behaviors and Postures on Public Transportation Systems.

Mobile phones are common in our daily life, but the users' preferences for postures or screen operating styles have not been studied. This was a cross-sectional and observational study. We randomly sampled passengers who used mobile phones on the Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) system in metropolitan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huey-Wen Liang, Yaw-Huei Hwang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4735449?pdf=render
id doaj-a48120d4f1df4245959f85e8076649ce
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a48120d4f1df4245959f85e8076649ce2020-11-25T01:24:00ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01112e014841910.1371/journal.pone.0148419Mobile Phone Use Behaviors and Postures on Public Transportation Systems.Huey-Wen LiangYaw-Huei HwangMobile phones are common in our daily life, but the users' preferences for postures or screen operating styles have not been studied. This was a cross-sectional and observational study. We randomly sampled passengers who used mobile phones on the Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) system in metropolitan Taipei. A checklist was used to observe their body postures and screen operating styles while sitting or standing. As a result, 1,230 subjects from 400 trips were observed. Overall, of all the passengers who were sitting, 41% of them were using mobile phones. The majority of the tasks involved browsing (84%) with their phones in a portrait orientation (93%). Different-hand holding/operating was the most commonly used operating style while sitting (46%) and same-hand holding/operating was the most common while standing (46%). The distribution of screen operating styles was significantly different for those sitting than for those standing and for different genders and age groups. The most frequently observed postures while sitting were having one's trunk against a backrest, feet on the floor and with or without an arm supported (58%). As for the users who were standing, the both- and different-hands groups had a high proportion of arms unsupported, feet on the floor and either their trunk supported or not. In contrast, the same-hand group tended to have their trunk unsupported, were holding a pole or handstrap and had both feet on floor. Further studies are warranted to characterize the ergonomic exposure of these commonly used postures and operating styles, and our results will help guide the selection of experimental conditions for laboratory settings.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4735449?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Huey-Wen Liang
Yaw-Huei Hwang
spellingShingle Huey-Wen Liang
Yaw-Huei Hwang
Mobile Phone Use Behaviors and Postures on Public Transportation Systems.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Huey-Wen Liang
Yaw-Huei Hwang
author_sort Huey-Wen Liang
title Mobile Phone Use Behaviors and Postures on Public Transportation Systems.
title_short Mobile Phone Use Behaviors and Postures on Public Transportation Systems.
title_full Mobile Phone Use Behaviors and Postures on Public Transportation Systems.
title_fullStr Mobile Phone Use Behaviors and Postures on Public Transportation Systems.
title_full_unstemmed Mobile Phone Use Behaviors and Postures on Public Transportation Systems.
title_sort mobile phone use behaviors and postures on public transportation systems.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Mobile phones are common in our daily life, but the users' preferences for postures or screen operating styles have not been studied. This was a cross-sectional and observational study. We randomly sampled passengers who used mobile phones on the Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) system in metropolitan Taipei. A checklist was used to observe their body postures and screen operating styles while sitting or standing. As a result, 1,230 subjects from 400 trips were observed. Overall, of all the passengers who were sitting, 41% of them were using mobile phones. The majority of the tasks involved browsing (84%) with their phones in a portrait orientation (93%). Different-hand holding/operating was the most commonly used operating style while sitting (46%) and same-hand holding/operating was the most common while standing (46%). The distribution of screen operating styles was significantly different for those sitting than for those standing and for different genders and age groups. The most frequently observed postures while sitting were having one's trunk against a backrest, feet on the floor and with or without an arm supported (58%). As for the users who were standing, the both- and different-hands groups had a high proportion of arms unsupported, feet on the floor and either their trunk supported or not. In contrast, the same-hand group tended to have their trunk unsupported, were holding a pole or handstrap and had both feet on floor. Further studies are warranted to characterize the ergonomic exposure of these commonly used postures and operating styles, and our results will help guide the selection of experimental conditions for laboratory settings.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4735449?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT hueywenliang mobilephoneusebehaviorsandposturesonpublictransportationsystems
AT yawhueihwang mobilephoneusebehaviorsandposturesonpublictransportationsystems
_version_ 1725119530728947712