Sociologija literature in prešernoslovje: nacija od revolucioniranja prek fetišizma do teorije
In the 1960s, Boris Ziherl provided Slovenian sociology with its theoretical and institutional foundation – historical materialism and a university department. After Ziherl, however, the two have only grown apart, often precisely through institutional ignorance of Ziherl’s legacy. And it is by assum...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculy of Arts)
2013-08-01
|
| Series: | Ars & Humanitas |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/arshumanitas/article/view/742 |
| Summary: | In the 1960s, Boris Ziherl provided Slovenian sociology with its theoretical and institutional foundation – historical materialism and a university department. After Ziherl, however, the two have only grown apart, often precisely through institutional ignorance of Ziherl’s legacy. And it is by assuming an anti-institutional perspective that two recent studies affirmatively articulate this legacy onto historical materialism. Both texts intervene into the Slovenian sociology of literature, which was also largely founded by Ziherl. I will hence address the key field shared by Slovenian sociology and literary studies: Prešeren studies. Ziherl’s account of the Slovenian national poet France Prešeren was formed during WWII and in the postwar period. While Ziherl’s interwar Prešeren is a poet and as such an adversary of German Romanticism, his postwar Prešeren is a thinker and as such an ally of Hegel’s anti-Romantic thought. In both cases, I will view it against the backdrop of the above-mentioned reactualisations of Ziherl: Miklavž Komelj’s book on Partisan art, for the first period, and Rastko Močnik’s book on Prešeren studies, for the second. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1854-9632 2350-4218 |