Moving Toward Spatial Solutions in Marine Conservation with Indigenous Communities

Community and resource user support has often been declared as essential to achieving globally agreed targets for marine protection. Given that indigenous people in Canada have resource use rights, we engaged two indigenous communities in British Columbia for their views on marine planning and prote...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Natalie C. Ban, Chris Picard, Amanda C.J. Vincent
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2008-06-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art32/
id doaj-a452c0916434425188cea0f799a6d5ad
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a452c0916434425188cea0f799a6d5ad2020-11-24T23:57:32ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872008-06-011313210.5751/ES-02473-1301322473Moving Toward Spatial Solutions in Marine Conservation with Indigenous CommunitiesNatalie C. Ban0Chris Picard1Amanda C.J. Vincent2Project SeahorseGitga'at Development CorporationProject SeahorseCommunity and resource user support has often been declared as essential to achieving globally agreed targets for marine protection. Given that indigenous people in Canada have resource use rights, we engaged two indigenous communities in British Columbia for their views on marine planning and protected areas. We developed a three-phased approach for executing our research: building research partnerships, carrying out individual interviews, and holding community discussion sessions. Participants expressed a common goal of recovering depleted species and ensuring the sustainability of indigenous fishing. We found strong support for spatial protection measures, and significant overlaps amongst participants in the areas suggested for protection. The most common type of protection recommended by participants was the exclusion of commercial and recreational fisheries while allowing for indigenous fishing; this stands in contrast to the emphasis on strict no-take MPAs advocated in the literature. Similarities in the goal, and level and areas of protection point to a gap in conservation approaches: the conservation of important areas and resources to indigenous people, allowing the continued practice and adaptation of their culture.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art32/aboriginal fisheriesBritish ColumbiaCanadacommercial fisheriescommunity-based conservationindigenous communitiesmarine conservationmarine protected areas
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Natalie C. Ban
Chris Picard
Amanda C.J. Vincent
spellingShingle Natalie C. Ban
Chris Picard
Amanda C.J. Vincent
Moving Toward Spatial Solutions in Marine Conservation with Indigenous Communities
Ecology and Society
aboriginal fisheries
British Columbia
Canada
commercial fisheries
community-based conservation
indigenous communities
marine conservation
marine protected areas
author_facet Natalie C. Ban
Chris Picard
Amanda C.J. Vincent
author_sort Natalie C. Ban
title Moving Toward Spatial Solutions in Marine Conservation with Indigenous Communities
title_short Moving Toward Spatial Solutions in Marine Conservation with Indigenous Communities
title_full Moving Toward Spatial Solutions in Marine Conservation with Indigenous Communities
title_fullStr Moving Toward Spatial Solutions in Marine Conservation with Indigenous Communities
title_full_unstemmed Moving Toward Spatial Solutions in Marine Conservation with Indigenous Communities
title_sort moving toward spatial solutions in marine conservation with indigenous communities
publisher Resilience Alliance
series Ecology and Society
issn 1708-3087
publishDate 2008-06-01
description Community and resource user support has often been declared as essential to achieving globally agreed targets for marine protection. Given that indigenous people in Canada have resource use rights, we engaged two indigenous communities in British Columbia for their views on marine planning and protected areas. We developed a three-phased approach for executing our research: building research partnerships, carrying out individual interviews, and holding community discussion sessions. Participants expressed a common goal of recovering depleted species and ensuring the sustainability of indigenous fishing. We found strong support for spatial protection measures, and significant overlaps amongst participants in the areas suggested for protection. The most common type of protection recommended by participants was the exclusion of commercial and recreational fisheries while allowing for indigenous fishing; this stands in contrast to the emphasis on strict no-take MPAs advocated in the literature. Similarities in the goal, and level and areas of protection point to a gap in conservation approaches: the conservation of important areas and resources to indigenous people, allowing the continued practice and adaptation of their culture.
topic aboriginal fisheries
British Columbia
Canada
commercial fisheries
community-based conservation
indigenous communities
marine conservation
marine protected areas
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art32/
work_keys_str_mv AT nataliecban movingtowardspatialsolutionsinmarineconservationwithindigenouscommunities
AT chrispicard movingtowardspatialsolutionsinmarineconservationwithindigenouscommunities
AT amandacjvincent movingtowardspatialsolutionsinmarineconservationwithindigenouscommunities
_version_ 1716246024815640576