Moving Toward Spatial Solutions in Marine Conservation with Indigenous Communities
Community and resource user support has often been declared as essential to achieving globally agreed targets for marine protection. Given that indigenous people in Canada have resource use rights, we engaged two indigenous communities in British Columbia for their views on marine planning and prote...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Resilience Alliance
2008-06-01
|
Series: | Ecology and Society |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art32/ |
id |
doaj-a452c0916434425188cea0f799a6d5ad |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a452c0916434425188cea0f799a6d5ad2020-11-24T23:57:32ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872008-06-011313210.5751/ES-02473-1301322473Moving Toward Spatial Solutions in Marine Conservation with Indigenous CommunitiesNatalie C. Ban0Chris Picard1Amanda C.J. Vincent2Project SeahorseGitga'at Development CorporationProject SeahorseCommunity and resource user support has often been declared as essential to achieving globally agreed targets for marine protection. Given that indigenous people in Canada have resource use rights, we engaged two indigenous communities in British Columbia for their views on marine planning and protected areas. We developed a three-phased approach for executing our research: building research partnerships, carrying out individual interviews, and holding community discussion sessions. Participants expressed a common goal of recovering depleted species and ensuring the sustainability of indigenous fishing. We found strong support for spatial protection measures, and significant overlaps amongst participants in the areas suggested for protection. The most common type of protection recommended by participants was the exclusion of commercial and recreational fisheries while allowing for indigenous fishing; this stands in contrast to the emphasis on strict no-take MPAs advocated in the literature. Similarities in the goal, and level and areas of protection point to a gap in conservation approaches: the conservation of important areas and resources to indigenous people, allowing the continued practice and adaptation of their culture.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art32/aboriginal fisheriesBritish ColumbiaCanadacommercial fisheriescommunity-based conservationindigenous communitiesmarine conservationmarine protected areas |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Natalie C. Ban Chris Picard Amanda C.J. Vincent |
spellingShingle |
Natalie C. Ban Chris Picard Amanda C.J. Vincent Moving Toward Spatial Solutions in Marine Conservation with Indigenous Communities Ecology and Society aboriginal fisheries British Columbia Canada commercial fisheries community-based conservation indigenous communities marine conservation marine protected areas |
author_facet |
Natalie C. Ban Chris Picard Amanda C.J. Vincent |
author_sort |
Natalie C. Ban |
title |
Moving Toward Spatial Solutions in Marine Conservation with Indigenous Communities |
title_short |
Moving Toward Spatial Solutions in Marine Conservation with Indigenous Communities |
title_full |
Moving Toward Spatial Solutions in Marine Conservation with Indigenous Communities |
title_fullStr |
Moving Toward Spatial Solutions in Marine Conservation with Indigenous Communities |
title_full_unstemmed |
Moving Toward Spatial Solutions in Marine Conservation with Indigenous Communities |
title_sort |
moving toward spatial solutions in marine conservation with indigenous communities |
publisher |
Resilience Alliance |
series |
Ecology and Society |
issn |
1708-3087 |
publishDate |
2008-06-01 |
description |
Community and resource user support has often been declared as essential to achieving globally agreed targets for marine protection. Given that indigenous people in Canada have resource use rights, we engaged two indigenous communities in British Columbia for their views on marine planning and protected areas. We developed a three-phased approach for executing our research: building research partnerships, carrying out individual interviews, and holding community discussion sessions. Participants expressed a common goal of recovering depleted species and ensuring the sustainability of indigenous fishing. We found strong support for spatial protection measures, and significant overlaps amongst participants in the areas suggested for protection. The most common type of protection recommended by participants was the exclusion of commercial and recreational fisheries while allowing for indigenous fishing; this stands in contrast to the emphasis on strict no-take MPAs advocated in the literature. Similarities in the goal, and level and areas of protection point to a gap in conservation approaches: the conservation of important areas and resources to indigenous people, allowing the continued practice and adaptation of their culture. |
topic |
aboriginal fisheries British Columbia Canada commercial fisheries community-based conservation indigenous communities marine conservation marine protected areas |
url |
http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art32/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nataliecban movingtowardspatialsolutionsinmarineconservationwithindigenouscommunities AT chrispicard movingtowardspatialsolutionsinmarineconservationwithindigenouscommunities AT amandacjvincent movingtowardspatialsolutionsinmarineconservationwithindigenouscommunities |
_version_ |
1716246024815640576 |