Should an intercalated degree be compulsory for undergraduate medical students?

• Main Authors: Aaron B. Philip, Sunila J. Prasad, Ankur Patel
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2015-10-01
• Series: Medical Education Online
• Subjects: iBSc; mandatory; medical school; research; projects; academic; BMedSci
• Online Access: http://med-ed-online.net/index.php/meo/article/view/29392/pdf_70

Undertaking an intercalated year whilst at medical school involves taking time out of the medicine undergraduate programme in order to pursue a separate but related degree. It is widely seen as a challenging but rewarding experience, with much to be gained from the independent project or research component of most additional degrees. However, whilst intercalating is encouraged at many universities and is incorporated into some undergraduate curricula, it is by no means compulsory for all students. The literature would suggest that those who have intercalated tend to do better academically, both for the remainder of medical school and after graduating. Despite this, the issue of making intercalation mandatory is one of considerable debate, with counter-arguments ranging from the detrimental effect time taken out of the course can have to the lack of options available to cater for all students. Nonetheless, the research skills developed during an intercalated year are invaluable and help students prepare for taking a critical evidence-based approach to medicine. If intercalated degrees were made compulsory for undergraduates, it would be a step in the right direction. It would mean the doctors of tomorrow would be better equipped to practise medicine in disciplines that are constantly evolving.