Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study

Objective Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common procedure for the treatment of cervical disease. Circumferential procedures are options for multilevel pathology. Potential complications of multilevel anterior procedures are dysphagia and pseudarthrosis, whereas potential complic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bernardo de Andrada Pereira, Joshua E. Heller, Jennifer N. Lehrman, Anna G.U. Sawa, Brian P. Kelly
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2021-03-01
Series:Neurospine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-neurospine.org/upload/pdf/ns-2040552-276.pdf
id doaj-a43c80a69bb44edba00e15e397f4766a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a43c80a69bb44edba00e15e397f4766a2021-04-06T00:31:46ZengKorean Spinal Neurosurgery SocietyNeurospine2586-65832586-65912021-03-0118118819610.14245/ns.2040552.2761126Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric StudyBernardo de Andrada Pereira0Joshua E. Heller1Jennifer N. Lehrman2Anna G.U. Sawa3Brian P. Kelly4 Spinal Biomechanics Laboratory, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA Spinal Biomechanics Laboratory, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA Spinal Biomechanics Laboratory, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA Spinal Biomechanics Laboratory, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USAObjective Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common procedure for the treatment of cervical disease. Circumferential procedures are options for multilevel pathology. Potential complications of multilevel anterior procedures are dysphagia and pseudarthrosis, whereas potential complications of posterior surgery include development of cervical kyphosis and postoperative chronic neck pain. The addition of posterior cervical cages (PCCs) to multilevel ACDF is a minimally invasive option to perform circumferential fusion. This study evaluated the biomechanical performance of 3-level circumferential fusion with PCCs as supplemental fixation to anteriorly placed allografts, with and without anterior plate fixation. Methods Nondestructive flexibility tests (1.5 Nm) performed on 6 cervical C2–7 cadaveric specimens intact and after discectomy (C3–6) in 3 instrumented conditions: allograft with anterior plate (G+P), PCC with allograft and plate (PCC+G+P), and PCC with allograft alone (PCC+G). Range of motion (ROM) data were analyzed using 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results All instrumented conditions resulted in significantly reduced ROM at the 3 instrumented levels (C3–6) compared to intact spinal segments in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation (p < 0.001). No significant difference in ROM was found between G+P and PCC+G+P conditions or between G+P and PCC+G conditions, indicating similar stability between these conditions in all directions of motion. Conclusion All instrumented conditions resulted in considerable reduction in ROM. The added reduction in ROM through the addition of PCCs did not reach statistical significance. Circumferential fusion with anterior allograft, without plate and with PCCs, has comparable stability to ACDF with allograft and plate.http://www.e-neurospine.org/upload/pdf/ns-2040552-276.pdfspinerotationrange of motioncadaverdiskectomyallografts
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bernardo de Andrada Pereira
Joshua E. Heller
Jennifer N. Lehrman
Anna G.U. Sawa
Brian P. Kelly
spellingShingle Bernardo de Andrada Pereira
Joshua E. Heller
Jennifer N. Lehrman
Anna G.U. Sawa
Brian P. Kelly
Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study
Neurospine
spine
rotation
range of motion
cadaver
diskectomy
allografts
author_facet Bernardo de Andrada Pereira
Joshua E. Heller
Jennifer N. Lehrman
Anna G.U. Sawa
Brian P. Kelly
author_sort Bernardo de Andrada Pereira
title Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study
title_short Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study
title_full Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study
title_fullStr Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study
title_sort biomechanics of circumferential cervical fixation using posterior facet cages: a cadaveric study
publisher Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
series Neurospine
issn 2586-6583
2586-6591
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Objective Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common procedure for the treatment of cervical disease. Circumferential procedures are options for multilevel pathology. Potential complications of multilevel anterior procedures are dysphagia and pseudarthrosis, whereas potential complications of posterior surgery include development of cervical kyphosis and postoperative chronic neck pain. The addition of posterior cervical cages (PCCs) to multilevel ACDF is a minimally invasive option to perform circumferential fusion. This study evaluated the biomechanical performance of 3-level circumferential fusion with PCCs as supplemental fixation to anteriorly placed allografts, with and without anterior plate fixation. Methods Nondestructive flexibility tests (1.5 Nm) performed on 6 cervical C2–7 cadaveric specimens intact and after discectomy (C3–6) in 3 instrumented conditions: allograft with anterior plate (G+P), PCC with allograft and plate (PCC+G+P), and PCC with allograft alone (PCC+G). Range of motion (ROM) data were analyzed using 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results All instrumented conditions resulted in significantly reduced ROM at the 3 instrumented levels (C3–6) compared to intact spinal segments in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation (p < 0.001). No significant difference in ROM was found between G+P and PCC+G+P conditions or between G+P and PCC+G conditions, indicating similar stability between these conditions in all directions of motion. Conclusion All instrumented conditions resulted in considerable reduction in ROM. The added reduction in ROM through the addition of PCCs did not reach statistical significance. Circumferential fusion with anterior allograft, without plate and with PCCs, has comparable stability to ACDF with allograft and plate.
topic spine
rotation
range of motion
cadaver
diskectomy
allografts
url http://www.e-neurospine.org/upload/pdf/ns-2040552-276.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT bernardodeandradapereira biomechanicsofcircumferentialcervicalfixationusingposteriorfacetcagesacadavericstudy
AT joshuaeheller biomechanicsofcircumferentialcervicalfixationusingposteriorfacetcagesacadavericstudy
AT jennifernlehrman biomechanicsofcircumferentialcervicalfixationusingposteriorfacetcagesacadavericstudy
AT annagusawa biomechanicsofcircumferentialcervicalfixationusingposteriorfacetcagesacadavericstudy
AT brianpkelly biomechanicsofcircumferentialcervicalfixationusingposteriorfacetcagesacadavericstudy
_version_ 1721538713200099328