Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study
Objective Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common procedure for the treatment of cervical disease. Circumferential procedures are options for multilevel pathology. Potential complications of multilevel anterior procedures are dysphagia and pseudarthrosis, whereas potential complic...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Neurospine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.e-neurospine.org/upload/pdf/ns-2040552-276.pdf |
id |
doaj-a43c80a69bb44edba00e15e397f4766a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a43c80a69bb44edba00e15e397f4766a2021-04-06T00:31:46ZengKorean Spinal Neurosurgery SocietyNeurospine2586-65832586-65912021-03-0118118819610.14245/ns.2040552.2761126Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric StudyBernardo de Andrada Pereira0Joshua E. Heller1Jennifer N. Lehrman2Anna G.U. Sawa3Brian P. Kelly4 Spinal Biomechanics Laboratory, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA Spinal Biomechanics Laboratory, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA Spinal Biomechanics Laboratory, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA Spinal Biomechanics Laboratory, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USAObjective Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common procedure for the treatment of cervical disease. Circumferential procedures are options for multilevel pathology. Potential complications of multilevel anterior procedures are dysphagia and pseudarthrosis, whereas potential complications of posterior surgery include development of cervical kyphosis and postoperative chronic neck pain. The addition of posterior cervical cages (PCCs) to multilevel ACDF is a minimally invasive option to perform circumferential fusion. This study evaluated the biomechanical performance of 3-level circumferential fusion with PCCs as supplemental fixation to anteriorly placed allografts, with and without anterior plate fixation. Methods Nondestructive flexibility tests (1.5 Nm) performed on 6 cervical C2–7 cadaveric specimens intact and after discectomy (C3–6) in 3 instrumented conditions: allograft with anterior plate (G+P), PCC with allograft and plate (PCC+G+P), and PCC with allograft alone (PCC+G). Range of motion (ROM) data were analyzed using 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results All instrumented conditions resulted in significantly reduced ROM at the 3 instrumented levels (C3–6) compared to intact spinal segments in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation (p < 0.001). No significant difference in ROM was found between G+P and PCC+G+P conditions or between G+P and PCC+G conditions, indicating similar stability between these conditions in all directions of motion. Conclusion All instrumented conditions resulted in considerable reduction in ROM. The added reduction in ROM through the addition of PCCs did not reach statistical significance. Circumferential fusion with anterior allograft, without plate and with PCCs, has comparable stability to ACDF with allograft and plate.http://www.e-neurospine.org/upload/pdf/ns-2040552-276.pdfspinerotationrange of motioncadaverdiskectomyallografts |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bernardo de Andrada Pereira Joshua E. Heller Jennifer N. Lehrman Anna G.U. Sawa Brian P. Kelly |
spellingShingle |
Bernardo de Andrada Pereira Joshua E. Heller Jennifer N. Lehrman Anna G.U. Sawa Brian P. Kelly Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study Neurospine spine rotation range of motion cadaver diskectomy allografts |
author_facet |
Bernardo de Andrada Pereira Joshua E. Heller Jennifer N. Lehrman Anna G.U. Sawa Brian P. Kelly |
author_sort |
Bernardo de Andrada Pereira |
title |
Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study |
title_short |
Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study |
title_full |
Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study |
title_fullStr |
Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study |
title_sort |
biomechanics of circumferential cervical fixation using posterior facet cages: a cadaveric study |
publisher |
Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society |
series |
Neurospine |
issn |
2586-6583 2586-6591 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
Objective Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common procedure for the treatment of cervical disease. Circumferential procedures are options for multilevel pathology. Potential complications of multilevel anterior procedures are dysphagia and pseudarthrosis, whereas potential complications of posterior surgery include development of cervical kyphosis and postoperative chronic neck pain. The addition of posterior cervical cages (PCCs) to multilevel ACDF is a minimally invasive option to perform circumferential fusion. This study evaluated the biomechanical performance of 3-level circumferential fusion with PCCs as supplemental fixation to anteriorly placed allografts, with and without anterior plate fixation. Methods Nondestructive flexibility tests (1.5 Nm) performed on 6 cervical C2–7 cadaveric specimens intact and after discectomy (C3–6) in 3 instrumented conditions: allograft with anterior plate (G+P), PCC with allograft and plate (PCC+G+P), and PCC with allograft alone (PCC+G). Range of motion (ROM) data were analyzed using 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results All instrumented conditions resulted in significantly reduced ROM at the 3 instrumented levels (C3–6) compared to intact spinal segments in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation (p < 0.001). No significant difference in ROM was found between G+P and PCC+G+P conditions or between G+P and PCC+G conditions, indicating similar stability between these conditions in all directions of motion. Conclusion All instrumented conditions resulted in considerable reduction in ROM. The added reduction in ROM through the addition of PCCs did not reach statistical significance. Circumferential fusion with anterior allograft, without plate and with PCCs, has comparable stability to ACDF with allograft and plate. |
topic |
spine rotation range of motion cadaver diskectomy allografts |
url |
http://www.e-neurospine.org/upload/pdf/ns-2040552-276.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bernardodeandradapereira biomechanicsofcircumferentialcervicalfixationusingposteriorfacetcagesacadavericstudy AT joshuaeheller biomechanicsofcircumferentialcervicalfixationusingposteriorfacetcagesacadavericstudy AT jennifernlehrman biomechanicsofcircumferentialcervicalfixationusingposteriorfacetcagesacadavericstudy AT annagusawa biomechanicsofcircumferentialcervicalfixationusingposteriorfacetcagesacadavericstudy AT brianpkelly biomechanicsofcircumferentialcervicalfixationusingposteriorfacetcagesacadavericstudy |
_version_ |
1721538713200099328 |