An iterative approach to case study analysis: insights from qualitative analysis of quantitative inconsistencies
Large-N comparative studies have helped common pool resource scholars gain general insights into the factors that influence collective action and governance outcomes. However, these studies are often limited by missing data, and suffer from the methodological limitation that important information is...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services)
2016-09-01
|
Series: | International Journal of the Commons |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/632 |
id |
doaj-a4387538fa9d47bf817b870b4f70b85e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Allain J Barnett Jacopo A Baggio Hoon C Shin David J Yu Irene Perez-Ibarra Cathy Rubinos Ute Brady Elicia Ratajczyk Nathan Rollins Rimjhim Aggarwal John M Anderies Marco A Janssen |
spellingShingle |
Allain J Barnett Jacopo A Baggio Hoon C Shin David J Yu Irene Perez-Ibarra Cathy Rubinos Ute Brady Elicia Ratajczyk Nathan Rollins Rimjhim Aggarwal John M Anderies Marco A Janssen An iterative approach to case study analysis: insights from qualitative analysis of quantitative inconsistencies International Journal of the Commons case study analysis common pool resources coupled infrastructure systems design principles institutional analysis large-n mixed methods |
author_facet |
Allain J Barnett Jacopo A Baggio Hoon C Shin David J Yu Irene Perez-Ibarra Cathy Rubinos Ute Brady Elicia Ratajczyk Nathan Rollins Rimjhim Aggarwal John M Anderies Marco A Janssen |
author_sort |
Allain J Barnett |
title |
An iterative approach to case study analysis: insights from qualitative analysis of quantitative inconsistencies |
title_short |
An iterative approach to case study analysis: insights from qualitative analysis of quantitative inconsistencies |
title_full |
An iterative approach to case study analysis: insights from qualitative analysis of quantitative inconsistencies |
title_fullStr |
An iterative approach to case study analysis: insights from qualitative analysis of quantitative inconsistencies |
title_full_unstemmed |
An iterative approach to case study analysis: insights from qualitative analysis of quantitative inconsistencies |
title_sort |
iterative approach to case study analysis: insights from qualitative analysis of quantitative inconsistencies |
publisher |
Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services) |
series |
International Journal of the Commons |
issn |
1875-0281 |
publishDate |
2016-09-01 |
description |
Large-N comparative studies have helped common pool resource scholars gain general insights into the factors that influence collective action and governance outcomes. However, these studies are often limited by missing data, and suffer from the methodological limitation that important information is lost when we reduce textual information to quantitative data. This study was motivated by nine case studies that appeared to be inconsistent with the expectation that the presence of Ostrom’s Design Principles increases the likelihood of successful common pool resource governance. These cases highlight the limitations of coding and analysing Large-N case studies. We examine two issues: 1) the challenge of missing data and 2) potential approaches that rely on context (which is often lost in the coding process) to address inconsistencies between empirical observations theoretical predictions. For the latter, we conduct a post-hoc qualitative analysis of a large-N comparative study to explore 2 types of inconsistencies: 1) cases where evidence for nearly all design principles was found, but available evidence led to the assessment that the CPR system was unsuccessful and 2) cases where the CPR system was deemed successful despite finding limited or no evidence for design principles. We describe inherent challenges to large-N comparative analysis to coding complex and dynamically changing common pool resource systems for the presence or absence of design principles and the determination of “success”. Finally, we illustrate how, in some cases, our qualitative analysis revealed that the identity of absent design principles explained inconsistencies hence de-facto reconciling such apparent inconsistencies with theoretical predictions. This analysis demonstrates the value of combining quantitative and qualitative analysis, and using mixed-methods approaches iteratively to build comprehensive methodological and theoretical approaches to understanding common pool resource governance in a dynamically changing context. |
topic |
case study analysis common pool resources coupled infrastructure systems design principles institutional analysis large-n mixed methods |
url |
https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/632 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT allainjbarnett aniterativeapproachtocasestudyanalysisinsightsfromqualitativeanalysisofquantitativeinconsistencies AT jacopoabaggio aniterativeapproachtocasestudyanalysisinsightsfromqualitativeanalysisofquantitativeinconsistencies AT hooncshin aniterativeapproachtocasestudyanalysisinsightsfromqualitativeanalysisofquantitativeinconsistencies AT davidjyu aniterativeapproachtocasestudyanalysisinsightsfromqualitativeanalysisofquantitativeinconsistencies AT ireneperezibarra aniterativeapproachtocasestudyanalysisinsightsfromqualitativeanalysisofquantitativeinconsistencies AT cathyrubinos aniterativeapproachtocasestudyanalysisinsightsfromqualitativeanalysisofquantitativeinconsistencies AT utebrady aniterativeapproachtocasestudyanalysisinsightsfromqualitativeanalysisofquantitativeinconsistencies AT eliciaratajczyk aniterativeapproachtocasestudyanalysisinsightsfromqualitativeanalysisofquantitativeinconsistencies AT nathanrollins aniterativeapproachtocasestudyanalysisinsightsfromqualitativeanalysisofquantitativeinconsistencies AT rimjhimaggarwal aniterativeapproachtocasestudyanalysisinsightsfromqualitativeanalysisofquantitativeinconsistencies AT johnmanderies aniterativeapproachtocasestudyanalysisinsightsfromqualitativeanalysisofquantitativeinconsistencies AT marcoajanssen aniterativeapproachtocasestudyanalysisinsightsfromqualitativeanalysisofquantitativeinconsistencies AT allainjbarnett iterativeapproachtocasestudyanalysisinsightsfromqualitativeanalysisofquantitativeinconsistencies AT jacopoabaggio iterativeapproachtocasestudyanalysisinsightsfromqualitativeanalysisofquantitativeinconsistencies AT hooncshin iterativeapproachtocasestudyanalysisinsightsfromqualitativeanalysisofquantitativeinconsistencies AT davidjyu iterativeapproachtocasestudyanalysisinsightsfromqualitativeanalysisofquantitativeinconsistencies AT ireneperezibarra iterativeapproachtocasestudyanalysisinsightsfromqualitativeanalysisofquantitativeinconsistencies AT cathyrubinos iterativeapproachtocasestudyanalysisinsightsfromqualitativeanalysisofquantitativeinconsistencies AT utebrady iterativeapproachtocasestudyanalysisinsightsfromqualitativeanalysisofquantitativeinconsistencies AT eliciaratajczyk iterativeapproachtocasestudyanalysisinsightsfromqualitativeanalysisofquantitativeinconsistencies AT nathanrollins iterativeapproachtocasestudyanalysisinsightsfromqualitativeanalysisofquantitativeinconsistencies AT rimjhimaggarwal iterativeapproachtocasestudyanalysisinsightsfromqualitativeanalysisofquantitativeinconsistencies AT johnmanderies iterativeapproachtocasestudyanalysisinsightsfromqualitativeanalysisofquantitativeinconsistencies AT marcoajanssen iterativeapproachtocasestudyanalysisinsightsfromqualitativeanalysisofquantitativeinconsistencies |
_version_ |
1724746172521775104 |
spelling |
doaj-a4387538fa9d47bf817b870b4f70b85e2020-11-25T02:48:52ZengUtrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services)International Journal of the Commons1875-02812016-09-0110246749410.18352/ijc.632303An iterative approach to case study analysis: insights from qualitative analysis of quantitative inconsistenciesAllain J Barnett0Jacopo A Baggio1Hoon C Shin2David J Yu3Irene Perez-Ibarra4Cathy Rubinos5Ute Brady6Elicia Ratajczyk7Nathan Rollins8Rimjhim Aggarwal9John M Anderies10Marco A Janssen11Department of Anthropology, University of New Brunswick Center for Behavior, Institutions and the Environment, Arizona State University School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State UniversityCenter for Behavior, Institutions and the Environment, Arizona State University Department of Environment and Society, Utah State UniversityCenter for Behavior, Institutions and the Environment, Arizona State University School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State UniversityCenter for Behavior, Institutions and the Environment, Arizona State University Lyles School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University Department of Political Science, Purdue University Center for the Environment, Purdue UniversityCenter for Behavior, Institutions and the Environment, Arizona State UniversityCenter for Behavior, Institutions and the Environment, Arizona State University School of Sustainability, Arizona State UniversityCenter for Behavior, Institutions and the Environment, Arizona State University School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State UniversityCenter for Behavior, Institutions and the Environment, Arizona State University School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State UniversityCenter for Behavior, Institutions and the Environment, Arizona State UniversityCenter for Behavior, Institutions and the Environment, Arizona State University School of Sustainability, Arizona State UniversityCenter for Behavior, Institutions and the Environment, Arizona State University School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University School of Sustainability, Arizona State UniversityCenter for Behavior, Institutions and the Environment, Arizona State University School of Sustainability, Arizona State UniversityLarge-N comparative studies have helped common pool resource scholars gain general insights into the factors that influence collective action and governance outcomes. However, these studies are often limited by missing data, and suffer from the methodological limitation that important information is lost when we reduce textual information to quantitative data. This study was motivated by nine case studies that appeared to be inconsistent with the expectation that the presence of Ostrom’s Design Principles increases the likelihood of successful common pool resource governance. These cases highlight the limitations of coding and analysing Large-N case studies. We examine two issues: 1) the challenge of missing data and 2) potential approaches that rely on context (which is often lost in the coding process) to address inconsistencies between empirical observations theoretical predictions. For the latter, we conduct a post-hoc qualitative analysis of a large-N comparative study to explore 2 types of inconsistencies: 1) cases where evidence for nearly all design principles was found, but available evidence led to the assessment that the CPR system was unsuccessful and 2) cases where the CPR system was deemed successful despite finding limited or no evidence for design principles. We describe inherent challenges to large-N comparative analysis to coding complex and dynamically changing common pool resource systems for the presence or absence of design principles and the determination of “success”. Finally, we illustrate how, in some cases, our qualitative analysis revealed that the identity of absent design principles explained inconsistencies hence de-facto reconciling such apparent inconsistencies with theoretical predictions. This analysis demonstrates the value of combining quantitative and qualitative analysis, and using mixed-methods approaches iteratively to build comprehensive methodological and theoretical approaches to understanding common pool resource governance in a dynamically changing context.https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/632case study analysiscommon pool resourcescoupled infrastructure systemsdesign principlesinstitutional analysislarge-nmixed methods |