An analysis of 'all'-clefts

This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the semantic and syntactic properties of 'all'-clefts ('All I ate for dinner was a salad'). The main characteristic of 'all'-clefts is the inference that what is designated by the cleft is not much (the “smallness effect”). On...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jos Tellings
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Library of Humanities 2020-11-01
Series:Glossa
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/1092
id doaj-a435e473396641aabe7a684914d2d0b2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a435e473396641aabe7a684914d2d0b22021-09-02T15:13:33ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesGlossa2397-18352020-11-015110.5334/gjgl.1092561An analysis of 'all'-cleftsJos Tellings0UiL-OTS, Utrecht University, UtrechtThis paper provides an in-depth analysis of the semantic and syntactic properties of 'all'-clefts ('All I ate for dinner was a salad'). The main characteristic of 'all'-clefts is the inference that what is designated by the cleft is not much (the “smallness effect”). On the basis of novel observations on 'all'-clefts with multi-clausal precopular clauses, and the interaction with negation and questions, I argue for three claims: (i) the word 'all' is the head of a relative clause (not a free relative), (ii) the precopular clause is derived by syntactic movement, and (iii) the source of the smallness effect is the mirativity of only (Beaver & Clark 2008; Zeevat 2009). The little formal work that exists on 'all'-clefts (Homer 2019) does not offer an analysis that reflects these three claims. Instead I propose a derivational account of 'all'-clefts based on Boeckx (2007).https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/1092clefts'all'smallness effectrelative clausesexclusives'only'
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jos Tellings
spellingShingle Jos Tellings
An analysis of 'all'-clefts
Glossa
clefts
'all'
smallness effect
relative clauses
exclusives
'only'
author_facet Jos Tellings
author_sort Jos Tellings
title An analysis of 'all'-clefts
title_short An analysis of 'all'-clefts
title_full An analysis of 'all'-clefts
title_fullStr An analysis of 'all'-clefts
title_full_unstemmed An analysis of 'all'-clefts
title_sort analysis of 'all'-clefts
publisher Open Library of Humanities
series Glossa
issn 2397-1835
publishDate 2020-11-01
description This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the semantic and syntactic properties of 'all'-clefts ('All I ate for dinner was a salad'). The main characteristic of 'all'-clefts is the inference that what is designated by the cleft is not much (the “smallness effect”). On the basis of novel observations on 'all'-clefts with multi-clausal precopular clauses, and the interaction with negation and questions, I argue for three claims: (i) the word 'all' is the head of a relative clause (not a free relative), (ii) the precopular clause is derived by syntactic movement, and (iii) the source of the smallness effect is the mirativity of only (Beaver & Clark 2008; Zeevat 2009). The little formal work that exists on 'all'-clefts (Homer 2019) does not offer an analysis that reflects these three claims. Instead I propose a derivational account of 'all'-clefts based on Boeckx (2007).
topic clefts
'all'
smallness effect
relative clauses
exclusives
'only'
url https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/1092
work_keys_str_mv AT jostellings ananalysisofallclefts
AT jostellings analysisofallclefts
_version_ 1721173929391816704