An analysis of 'all'-clefts
This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the semantic and syntactic properties of 'all'-clefts ('All I ate for dinner was a salad'). The main characteristic of 'all'-clefts is the inference that what is designated by the cleft is not much (the “smallness effect”). On...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Open Library of Humanities
2020-11-01
|
Series: | Glossa |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/1092 |
id |
doaj-a435e473396641aabe7a684914d2d0b2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a435e473396641aabe7a684914d2d0b22021-09-02T15:13:33ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesGlossa2397-18352020-11-015110.5334/gjgl.1092561An analysis of 'all'-cleftsJos Tellings0UiL-OTS, Utrecht University, UtrechtThis paper provides an in-depth analysis of the semantic and syntactic properties of 'all'-clefts ('All I ate for dinner was a salad'). The main characteristic of 'all'-clefts is the inference that what is designated by the cleft is not much (the “smallness effect”). On the basis of novel observations on 'all'-clefts with multi-clausal precopular clauses, and the interaction with negation and questions, I argue for three claims: (i) the word 'all' is the head of a relative clause (not a free relative), (ii) the precopular clause is derived by syntactic movement, and (iii) the source of the smallness effect is the mirativity of only (Beaver & Clark 2008; Zeevat 2009). The little formal work that exists on 'all'-clefts (Homer 2019) does not offer an analysis that reflects these three claims. Instead I propose a derivational account of 'all'-clefts based on Boeckx (2007).https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/1092clefts'all'smallness effectrelative clausesexclusives'only' |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jos Tellings |
spellingShingle |
Jos Tellings An analysis of 'all'-clefts Glossa clefts 'all' smallness effect relative clauses exclusives 'only' |
author_facet |
Jos Tellings |
author_sort |
Jos Tellings |
title |
An analysis of 'all'-clefts |
title_short |
An analysis of 'all'-clefts |
title_full |
An analysis of 'all'-clefts |
title_fullStr |
An analysis of 'all'-clefts |
title_full_unstemmed |
An analysis of 'all'-clefts |
title_sort |
analysis of 'all'-clefts |
publisher |
Open Library of Humanities |
series |
Glossa |
issn |
2397-1835 |
publishDate |
2020-11-01 |
description |
This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the semantic and syntactic properties of 'all'-clefts ('All I ate for dinner was a salad'). The main characteristic of 'all'-clefts is the inference that what is designated by the cleft is not much (the “smallness effect”). On the basis of novel observations on 'all'-clefts with multi-clausal precopular clauses, and the interaction with negation and questions, I argue for three claims: (i) the word 'all' is the head of a relative clause (not a free relative), (ii) the precopular clause is derived by syntactic movement, and (iii) the source of the smallness effect is the mirativity of only (Beaver & Clark 2008; Zeevat 2009). The little formal work that exists on 'all'-clefts (Homer 2019) does not offer an analysis that reflects these three claims. Instead I propose a derivational account of 'all'-clefts based on Boeckx (2007). |
topic |
clefts 'all' smallness effect relative clauses exclusives 'only' |
url |
https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/1092 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jostellings ananalysisofallclefts AT jostellings analysisofallclefts |
_version_ |
1721173929391816704 |