| Summary: | This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the semantic and syntactic properties of 'all'-clefts ('All I ate for dinner was a salad'). The main characteristic of 'all'-clefts is the inference that what is designated by the cleft is not much (the “smallness effect”). On the basis of novel observations on 'all'-clefts with multi-clausal precopular clauses, and the interaction with negation and questions, I argue for three claims: (i) the word 'all' is the head of a relative clause (not a free relative), (ii) the precopular clause is derived by syntactic movement, and (iii) the source of the smallness effect is the mirativity of only (Beaver & Clark 2008; Zeevat 2009). The little formal work that exists on 'all'-clefts (Homer 2019) does not offer an analysis that reflects these three claims. Instead I propose a derivational account of 'all'-clefts based on Boeckx (2007).
|
|---|
