Examining recruitment feasibility and related outcomes in adults post-stroke

Abstract Background There are limited effective and evidence-based interventions for upper extremity hemiparesis post-stroke. To prepare for an RCT and minimize misuse of resources, there is value in conducting a feasibility study. Objective To examine the feasibility of recruitment and other relate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erin C King, Megan Doherty, Daniel Corcos, Mary Ellen Stoykov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-10-01
Series:Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40814-020-00696-w
id doaj-a425508d43904c6d96cf042bfd66c336
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a425508d43904c6d96cf042bfd66c3362020-11-25T03:36:37ZengBMCPilot and Feasibility Studies2055-57842020-10-01611910.1186/s40814-020-00696-wExamining recruitment feasibility and related outcomes in adults post-strokeErin C King0Megan Doherty1Daniel Corcos2Mary Ellen Stoykov3Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Northwestern UniversitySwedish Medical CenterNorthwestern UniversityNorthwestern UniversityAbstract Background There are limited effective and evidence-based interventions for upper extremity hemiparesis post-stroke. To prepare for an RCT and minimize misuse of resources, there is value in conducting a feasibility study. Objective To examine the feasibility of recruitment and other related outcomes for an intense upper limb intervention. Methodology Feasibility outcomes included retention, adherence, accrual rate, sample characteristics, and identification of productive recruitment methods. Other outcomes included satisfaction with the study, fidelity, and equipoise of both staff and participants. Results Participants were enrolled at a rate of 1.33 per month. The recruitment timeline had to be extended by 4 months, to meet the target of 16 randomized participants. Staggered recruitment was the most successful strategy. We found that following up with individuals who missed initial appointments prior to study enrollment led to decreased adherence. Conclusion It is feasible to recruit and retain post-stroke participants for an intense intervention study. Trial registration NCT02277028http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40814-020-00696-w
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Erin C King
Megan Doherty
Daniel Corcos
Mary Ellen Stoykov
spellingShingle Erin C King
Megan Doherty
Daniel Corcos
Mary Ellen Stoykov
Examining recruitment feasibility and related outcomes in adults post-stroke
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
author_facet Erin C King
Megan Doherty
Daniel Corcos
Mary Ellen Stoykov
author_sort Erin C King
title Examining recruitment feasibility and related outcomes in adults post-stroke
title_short Examining recruitment feasibility and related outcomes in adults post-stroke
title_full Examining recruitment feasibility and related outcomes in adults post-stroke
title_fullStr Examining recruitment feasibility and related outcomes in adults post-stroke
title_full_unstemmed Examining recruitment feasibility and related outcomes in adults post-stroke
title_sort examining recruitment feasibility and related outcomes in adults post-stroke
publisher BMC
series Pilot and Feasibility Studies
issn 2055-5784
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Abstract Background There are limited effective and evidence-based interventions for upper extremity hemiparesis post-stroke. To prepare for an RCT and minimize misuse of resources, there is value in conducting a feasibility study. Objective To examine the feasibility of recruitment and other related outcomes for an intense upper limb intervention. Methodology Feasibility outcomes included retention, adherence, accrual rate, sample characteristics, and identification of productive recruitment methods. Other outcomes included satisfaction with the study, fidelity, and equipoise of both staff and participants. Results Participants were enrolled at a rate of 1.33 per month. The recruitment timeline had to be extended by 4 months, to meet the target of 16 randomized participants. Staggered recruitment was the most successful strategy. We found that following up with individuals who missed initial appointments prior to study enrollment led to decreased adherence. Conclusion It is feasible to recruit and retain post-stroke participants for an intense intervention study. Trial registration NCT02277028
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40814-020-00696-w
work_keys_str_mv AT erincking examiningrecruitmentfeasibilityandrelatedoutcomesinadultspoststroke
AT megandoherty examiningrecruitmentfeasibilityandrelatedoutcomesinadultspoststroke
AT danielcorcos examiningrecruitmentfeasibilityandrelatedoutcomesinadultspoststroke
AT maryellenstoykov examiningrecruitmentfeasibilityandrelatedoutcomesinadultspoststroke
_version_ 1724549143613931520