Dominant Groups Have Right to Live?
<p>I have divided this paper into four sections: (1) Bio- and socio-cultural diversity, (2) Definition and identification of “tribals” in Nepal, (3) Tribals and Forests, and (4) Common issues of sustainable livelihood. Tribals and Forests are divided into two sub-sections:...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Tribhuvan University
2006-12-01
|
Series: | Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology |
Online Access: | http://nepjol.info/index.php/DSAJ/article/view/275 |
Summary: | <p>I have divided this paper into four sections: (1) Bio- and socio-cultural diversity, (2) Definition and identification of “tribals” in Nepal, (3) Tribals and Forests, and (4) Common issues of sustainable livelihood. Tribals and Forests are divided into two sub-sections: (i) Forest dwellers (nomads and settled forest dwellers) and (ii) Tribals who have been dispossessed from their forests and lands and now become forest dependent. I have identified four common issues of sustainable livelihood: (I) land alienation, (ii) displacement and deforestation, (iii) loss or exploitation of indigenous knowledge system, and (iv) lack of resistance, organized movements and insurgency.</p><p>DOI: 10.3126/dsaj.v1i0.275</p><p><em>Dauligiri</em> Vol.1 (2005) pp.42-66</p>
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1994-2664 1994-2672 |