To What Extent Do Successive Cohorts Adopt Different Publication Patterns? Peer Review, Language Use, and Publication Types in the Social Sciences and Humanities

This article presents a cohort analysis to study changes in the publication patterns of scholars working at a social sciences and humanities (SSH) university department or research unit in Flanders, Belgium. Starting from a comprehensive bibliographic database, we analyze the peer review status, pub...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Raf Guns, Joshua Eykens, Tim C. E. Engels
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frma.2018.00038/full
id doaj-a4005a56ab66441493c90b40c08ae811
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a4005a56ab66441493c90b40c08ae8112021-06-02T12:27:45ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics2504-05372019-01-01310.3389/frma.2018.00038427645To What Extent Do Successive Cohorts Adopt Different Publication Patterns? Peer Review, Language Use, and Publication Types in the Social Sciences and HumanitiesRaf GunsJoshua EykensTim C. E. EngelsThis article presents a cohort analysis to study changes in the publication patterns of scholars working at a social sciences and humanities (SSH) university department or research unit in Flanders, Belgium. Starting from a comprehensive bibliographic database, we analyze the peer review status, publication language, publication type (journal article, book publication, or proceedings), and coverage in Web of Science (WoS) for publications produced between 2000 and 2014. Through a cohort analysis of the authors, a distinction can be made between effects that reflect changes in the characteristics of how researchers of comparable seniority publish (intracohort change) and effects that are due to the disappearance of researchers and/or introduction of new researchers (cohort succession). Our findings indicate that there is a trend across all five cohorts and in both the social sciences and humanities toward peer review, use of English, and publishing in WoS-indexed journals. While we witness clear intracohort changes, cohort succession effects are shown to be much weaker. The oldest cohort appears to maintain a traditional SSH profile, with lower shares of peer-reviewed publications, publications in English, journal articles, and publications indexed in WoS. As for publication types, all cohorts exhibit a slightly declining share of journal articles over time in favor of book publications, particularly in the humanities. The study shows that cohort analysis is a useful instrument to gain better insight into the evolution of publication patterns.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frma.2018.00038/fullpublication patternssocial sciences and humanitiescohort analysispeer reviewlanguage usepublication types
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Raf Guns
Joshua Eykens
Tim C. E. Engels
spellingShingle Raf Guns
Joshua Eykens
Tim C. E. Engels
To What Extent Do Successive Cohorts Adopt Different Publication Patterns? Peer Review, Language Use, and Publication Types in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics
publication patterns
social sciences and humanities
cohort analysis
peer review
language use
publication types
author_facet Raf Guns
Joshua Eykens
Tim C. E. Engels
author_sort Raf Guns
title To What Extent Do Successive Cohorts Adopt Different Publication Patterns? Peer Review, Language Use, and Publication Types in the Social Sciences and Humanities
title_short To What Extent Do Successive Cohorts Adopt Different Publication Patterns? Peer Review, Language Use, and Publication Types in the Social Sciences and Humanities
title_full To What Extent Do Successive Cohorts Adopt Different Publication Patterns? Peer Review, Language Use, and Publication Types in the Social Sciences and Humanities
title_fullStr To What Extent Do Successive Cohorts Adopt Different Publication Patterns? Peer Review, Language Use, and Publication Types in the Social Sciences and Humanities
title_full_unstemmed To What Extent Do Successive Cohorts Adopt Different Publication Patterns? Peer Review, Language Use, and Publication Types in the Social Sciences and Humanities
title_sort to what extent do successive cohorts adopt different publication patterns? peer review, language use, and publication types in the social sciences and humanities
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics
issn 2504-0537
publishDate 2019-01-01
description This article presents a cohort analysis to study changes in the publication patterns of scholars working at a social sciences and humanities (SSH) university department or research unit in Flanders, Belgium. Starting from a comprehensive bibliographic database, we analyze the peer review status, publication language, publication type (journal article, book publication, or proceedings), and coverage in Web of Science (WoS) for publications produced between 2000 and 2014. Through a cohort analysis of the authors, a distinction can be made between effects that reflect changes in the characteristics of how researchers of comparable seniority publish (intracohort change) and effects that are due to the disappearance of researchers and/or introduction of new researchers (cohort succession). Our findings indicate that there is a trend across all five cohorts and in both the social sciences and humanities toward peer review, use of English, and publishing in WoS-indexed journals. While we witness clear intracohort changes, cohort succession effects are shown to be much weaker. The oldest cohort appears to maintain a traditional SSH profile, with lower shares of peer-reviewed publications, publications in English, journal articles, and publications indexed in WoS. As for publication types, all cohorts exhibit a slightly declining share of journal articles over time in favor of book publications, particularly in the humanities. The study shows that cohort analysis is a useful instrument to gain better insight into the evolution of publication patterns.
topic publication patterns
social sciences and humanities
cohort analysis
peer review
language use
publication types
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frma.2018.00038/full
work_keys_str_mv AT rafguns towhatextentdosuccessivecohortsadoptdifferentpublicationpatternspeerreviewlanguageuseandpublicationtypesinthesocialsciencesandhumanities
AT joshuaeykens towhatextentdosuccessivecohortsadoptdifferentpublicationpatternspeerreviewlanguageuseandpublicationtypesinthesocialsciencesandhumanities
AT timceengels towhatextentdosuccessivecohortsadoptdifferentpublicationpatternspeerreviewlanguageuseandpublicationtypesinthesocialsciencesandhumanities
_version_ 1721404429885767680