The Evolving Common Law Jurisprudence Combatting the Threat of Terrorism in the United Kingdom, United States, and Canada
Terrorism is a concept that defies a simple and straightforward legal definition. Therefore, it is not surprising to find that there is no Comprehensive Convention on Terrorism with a universally accepted definition of what constitutes “terrorism.„ Consequently, States have devis...
Main Author: | James C. Simeon |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-02-01
|
Series: | Laws |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/8/1/5 |
Similar Items
-
The Problematic of the Jurisprudential Terms in Comparative Studies Between Jurisprudence And Law
by: chouder yamina
Published: (2019-12-01) -
Legal Uncertainty in EU’s Quest to Combat Terrorism – A Critical Examination of the Terrorism Directive’s Prohibition of Receiving Training for Terrorism and Travelling for the Purpose of Terrorism.
by: Harkkila, Anna
Published: (2020) -
El papel de los tribunales en el control de las medidas contra el terrorismo internacional: ¿hacia un diálogo jurisprudencial? = The role of the courts in the control of measures against international terrorism: towards a jurisprudential dialogue?
by: Tania Groppi
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Investigation Of Stem Cells Technology In The Light Of Jurisprudential Documents
by: Ahmad Pourebrahim, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01) -
With Liberty and Justice for All: An Examination of the United States’ Compliance with Rule of Law as it relates to Domestic and International Terrorism
by: Maze, Jonathan William
Published: (2018)