In Search of Alignment: A Review of Impact Studies in Entrepreneurship Education

This study uses the concept of alignment as a framework to examine empirical research on the impact of entrepreneurship education interventions on students. Alignment assumes that effective instruction requires congruence between three instructional components: intended outcomes, instructional proce...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Uladzimir Kamovich, Lene Foss
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2017-01-01
Series:Education Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1450102
id doaj-a3e76e87595c4ee089e7c05c27478d98
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a3e76e87595c4ee089e7c05c27478d982020-11-24T21:30:43ZengHindawi LimitedEducation Research International2090-40022090-40102017-01-01201710.1155/2017/14501021450102In Search of Alignment: A Review of Impact Studies in Entrepreneurship EducationUladzimir Kamovich0Lene Foss1School of Business and Economics, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, NorwaySchool of Business and Economics, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, NorwayThis study uses the concept of alignment as a framework to examine empirical research on the impact of entrepreneurship education interventions on students. Alignment assumes that effective instruction requires congruence between three instructional components: intended outcomes, instructional processes, and assessment criteria. Given the extant diversity and complexity of entrepreneurship education impact, scholars have not been able to explain how teaching approaches and methods are being adjusted to the variety of expected outcomes. In order to address this gap, we critically reviewed the published empirical studies on entrepreneurship education impact in 20 journals over a 15-year period (2000–2015). We found 16 empirical studies that met our inclusion criteria. Our findings revealed that teaching objectives, teaching methods, and teaching content receive scant attention from researchers. This study will be of value to scholars researching the impact of heterogeneous entrepreneurship education practices and approaches on individuals. Our analytical framework could contribute to less contradictory findings of entrepreneurship education impact studies. We also identify research limitations and suggest avenues for future research.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1450102
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Uladzimir Kamovich
Lene Foss
spellingShingle Uladzimir Kamovich
Lene Foss
In Search of Alignment: A Review of Impact Studies in Entrepreneurship Education
Education Research International
author_facet Uladzimir Kamovich
Lene Foss
author_sort Uladzimir Kamovich
title In Search of Alignment: A Review of Impact Studies in Entrepreneurship Education
title_short In Search of Alignment: A Review of Impact Studies in Entrepreneurship Education
title_full In Search of Alignment: A Review of Impact Studies in Entrepreneurship Education
title_fullStr In Search of Alignment: A Review of Impact Studies in Entrepreneurship Education
title_full_unstemmed In Search of Alignment: A Review of Impact Studies in Entrepreneurship Education
title_sort in search of alignment: a review of impact studies in entrepreneurship education
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Education Research International
issn 2090-4002
2090-4010
publishDate 2017-01-01
description This study uses the concept of alignment as a framework to examine empirical research on the impact of entrepreneurship education interventions on students. Alignment assumes that effective instruction requires congruence between three instructional components: intended outcomes, instructional processes, and assessment criteria. Given the extant diversity and complexity of entrepreneurship education impact, scholars have not been able to explain how teaching approaches and methods are being adjusted to the variety of expected outcomes. In order to address this gap, we critically reviewed the published empirical studies on entrepreneurship education impact in 20 journals over a 15-year period (2000–2015). We found 16 empirical studies that met our inclusion criteria. Our findings revealed that teaching objectives, teaching methods, and teaching content receive scant attention from researchers. This study will be of value to scholars researching the impact of heterogeneous entrepreneurship education practices and approaches on individuals. Our analytical framework could contribute to less contradictory findings of entrepreneurship education impact studies. We also identify research limitations and suggest avenues for future research.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1450102
work_keys_str_mv AT uladzimirkamovich insearchofalignmentareviewofimpactstudiesinentrepreneurshipeducation
AT lenefoss insearchofalignmentareviewofimpactstudiesinentrepreneurshipeducation
_version_ 1725961970843123712