Evaluation of Sorption Coefficients for Pyroxasulfone, -Metolachlor, and Dimethenamid-

Sorption coefficients were evaluated for pyroxasulfone, s -metolachlor, and dimethenamid- p across 25 soil types with different chemical and physical properties to better understand how soil properties influence the binding of pyroxasulfone in different soils. Sorption coefficients were determined u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eric P. Westra, Dale L. Shaner, Ken A. Barbarick, Raj Khosla
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2015-01-01
Series:Air, Soil and Water Research
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4137/ASWR.S19682
id doaj-a3c10787ac7e4114bd47299d004a5217
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a3c10787ac7e4114bd47299d004a52172020-11-25T03:26:31ZengSAGE PublishingAir, Soil and Water Research1178-62212015-01-01810.4137/ASWR.S19682Evaluation of Sorption Coefficients for Pyroxasulfone, -Metolachlor, and Dimethenamid-Eric P. Westra0Dale L. Shaner1Ken A. Barbarick2Raj Khosla3Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.USDA-ARS Water Management Unit, Fort Collins, CO, USA (Retired).Soil and Crop Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.Soil and Crop Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.Sorption coefficients were evaluated for pyroxasulfone, s -metolachlor, and dimethenamid- p across 25 soil types with different chemical and physical properties to better understand how soil properties influence the binding of pyroxasulfone in different soils. Sorption coefficients were determined using a batch equilibrium method to evaluate relative differences in binding among the three herbicides. Based on water solubility values, we would have expected the relative order of binding to be dimethenamid- p (1450 mg L −1 at 20°C), s -metolachlor (530 mg L −1 at 20°C), and pyroxasulfone (3.49 mg L −1 at 20°C) in order of increasing binding. However, when sorption coefficients were calculated, we observed the order of pyroxasulfone = dimethenamid- p < s -metolachlor in the order of increasing binding. The average K d (sorption coefficient) values were 1.7, 2.3, and 4.0 L kg −1 for pyroxasulfone, dimethenamid- p , and s -metolachlor, respectively. Although dimethenamid- p has water solubility values that are over 400 times greater than pyroxasulfone, there was no statistical difference in binding between pyroxasulfone and dimethenamid- p. s -Metolachlor binding was statistically greater than both pyroxasulfone and dimethenamid- p. Across all soil chemical and physical properties, sorption coefficients for all three herbicides were highly and statistically correlated to soil organic matter. Sand and silt were also statistically correlated to binding, although these correlations could be explained by the high correlation of organic matter to these properties. Evaluation of sorption coefficients indicates that pyroxasulfone is most prevalent in the soil solution where herbicides are available for plant uptake. Reduced soil binding and greater activity at the target site could contribute to comparable weed control efficacies of pyroxasulfone even when applied at lower use rates compared to either s -metolachlor or dimethenamid- p.https://doi.org/10.4137/ASWR.S19682
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eric P. Westra
Dale L. Shaner
Ken A. Barbarick
Raj Khosla
spellingShingle Eric P. Westra
Dale L. Shaner
Ken A. Barbarick
Raj Khosla
Evaluation of Sorption Coefficients for Pyroxasulfone, -Metolachlor, and Dimethenamid-
Air, Soil and Water Research
author_facet Eric P. Westra
Dale L. Shaner
Ken A. Barbarick
Raj Khosla
author_sort Eric P. Westra
title Evaluation of Sorption Coefficients for Pyroxasulfone, -Metolachlor, and Dimethenamid-
title_short Evaluation of Sorption Coefficients for Pyroxasulfone, -Metolachlor, and Dimethenamid-
title_full Evaluation of Sorption Coefficients for Pyroxasulfone, -Metolachlor, and Dimethenamid-
title_fullStr Evaluation of Sorption Coefficients for Pyroxasulfone, -Metolachlor, and Dimethenamid-
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Sorption Coefficients for Pyroxasulfone, -Metolachlor, and Dimethenamid-
title_sort evaluation of sorption coefficients for pyroxasulfone, -metolachlor, and dimethenamid-
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Air, Soil and Water Research
issn 1178-6221
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Sorption coefficients were evaluated for pyroxasulfone, s -metolachlor, and dimethenamid- p across 25 soil types with different chemical and physical properties to better understand how soil properties influence the binding of pyroxasulfone in different soils. Sorption coefficients were determined using a batch equilibrium method to evaluate relative differences in binding among the three herbicides. Based on water solubility values, we would have expected the relative order of binding to be dimethenamid- p (1450 mg L −1 at 20°C), s -metolachlor (530 mg L −1 at 20°C), and pyroxasulfone (3.49 mg L −1 at 20°C) in order of increasing binding. However, when sorption coefficients were calculated, we observed the order of pyroxasulfone = dimethenamid- p < s -metolachlor in the order of increasing binding. The average K d (sorption coefficient) values were 1.7, 2.3, and 4.0 L kg −1 for pyroxasulfone, dimethenamid- p , and s -metolachlor, respectively. Although dimethenamid- p has water solubility values that are over 400 times greater than pyroxasulfone, there was no statistical difference in binding between pyroxasulfone and dimethenamid- p. s -Metolachlor binding was statistically greater than both pyroxasulfone and dimethenamid- p. Across all soil chemical and physical properties, sorption coefficients for all three herbicides were highly and statistically correlated to soil organic matter. Sand and silt were also statistically correlated to binding, although these correlations could be explained by the high correlation of organic matter to these properties. Evaluation of sorption coefficients indicates that pyroxasulfone is most prevalent in the soil solution where herbicides are available for plant uptake. Reduced soil binding and greater activity at the target site could contribute to comparable weed control efficacies of pyroxasulfone even when applied at lower use rates compared to either s -metolachlor or dimethenamid- p.
url https://doi.org/10.4137/ASWR.S19682
work_keys_str_mv AT ericpwestra evaluationofsorptioncoefficientsforpyroxasulfonemetolachloranddimethenamid
AT dalelshaner evaluationofsorptioncoefficientsforpyroxasulfonemetolachloranddimethenamid
AT kenabarbarick evaluationofsorptioncoefficientsforpyroxasulfonemetolachloranddimethenamid
AT rajkhosla evaluationofsorptioncoefficientsforpyroxasulfonemetolachloranddimethenamid
_version_ 1724592236091408384