Centralized vs. decentralized ledgers in the money supply process: a SWOT analysis

This study aims to better understand the role of centralized and decentralized ledgers in the money supply process. The aim is to highlight the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of these tools in the context of finance and banking. A thorough investigation of the prior literature was...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abderahman Rejeb, Karim Rejeb, John G. Keogh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIMS Press 2021-04-01
Series:Quantitative Finance and Economics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/10.3934/QFE.2021003?viewType=HTML
Description
Summary:This study aims to better understand the role of centralized and decentralized ledgers in the money supply process. The aim is to highlight the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of these tools in the context of finance and banking. A thorough investigation of the prior literature was carried out using sources extracted from various academic databases. A SWOT analysis based on an integrative literature review methodology was conducted to synthesize various research contributions and analyze relevant information related to centralized and decentralized ledgers. The findings reveal that centralized ledgers are still critical in the record-keeping of financial transactions, despite the strengths and opportunities of decentralized ledgers outweighing those of centralized ledgers. This study helps to increase the understanding of financial and banking sector managers concerning the importance of decentralized ledgers in delivering more value to customers.
ISSN:2573-0134