Binary Theorizing Does Not Account for Action Control
Everyday thinking and scientific theorizing about human action control are equally driven by the apparently obvious contrast between will and habit or, in their more modern disguise: intentional and automatic processes, and model-based and model-free action planning. And yet, no comprehensive catego...
Main Author: | Bernhard Hommel |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019-11-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02542/full |
Similar Items
-
Dancing in the dark: No role for consciousness in action control
by: Bernhard eHommel
Published: (2013-06-01) -
Everyday robotic action: Lessons from human action control
by: Roy eDe Kleijn, et al.
Published: (2014-03-01) -
When Focusing on a Goal Interferes with Action Control: Action Versus State Orientation and Over-maintenance of Intentions [1]
by: Hester A.H. Ruigendijk, et al.
Published: (2016-06-01) -
Where do action goals come from? Evidence for spontaneous action-effect binding in infants
by: Stephan Alexander Verschoor, et al.
Published: (2010-11-01) -
Explicit Sense of Agency in an Automatic Control Situation: Effects of Goal-Directed Action and the Gradual Emergence of Outcome
by: Ryoichi Nakashima, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01)