Die „soziale Frage" more geometrico beantwortet
Mainstream economics tends to view its historical process of mathematicization as a „powerful, irresistible current of thought" (Debreu), perfectly motivated by the application of deductive methodology to a quantified object-domain. This interpretation stands in sharp contrast to the his...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
StudienVerlag
1996-01-01
|
Series: | Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften |
Online Access: | https://journals.univie.ac.at/index.php/oezg/article/view/5646 |
id |
doaj-a39e8bac5d7e44c18fd8e8d246077186 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a39e8bac5d7e44c18fd8e8d2460771862021-03-18T20:49:54ZdeuStudienVerlagÖsterreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften1016-765X2707-966X1996-01-017210.25365/oezg-1996-7-2-5 Die „soziale Frage" more geometrico beantwortetDaniel Eckert0Leonhard Bauer1Institut für Volkswirtschaftstheorie und -politik, Wirtschaftsuniversität WienInstitut für Volkswirtschaftstheorie und -politik, Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien Mainstream economics tends to view its historical process of mathematicization as a „powerful, irresistible current of thought" (Debreu), perfectly motivated by the application of deductive methodology to a quantified object-domain. This interpretation stands in sharp contrast to the historical background of mathematical economics as founded by Leon Walras: the French school of political economy following J.-B. Say combines deductivism with a strong resistance to mathematicization. Rather than simply being an emulation of rational mechanics, Walrasian general equilibrium theory is motivated by natural law issues related to the „social question". https://journals.univie.ac.at/index.php/oezg/article/view/5646 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Daniel Eckert Leonhard Bauer |
spellingShingle |
Daniel Eckert Leonhard Bauer Die „soziale Frage" more geometrico beantwortet Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften |
author_facet |
Daniel Eckert Leonhard Bauer |
author_sort |
Daniel Eckert |
title |
Die „soziale Frage" more geometrico beantwortet |
title_short |
Die „soziale Frage" more geometrico beantwortet |
title_full |
Die „soziale Frage" more geometrico beantwortet |
title_fullStr |
Die „soziale Frage" more geometrico beantwortet |
title_full_unstemmed |
Die „soziale Frage" more geometrico beantwortet |
title_sort |
die „soziale frage" more geometrico beantwortet |
publisher |
StudienVerlag |
series |
Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften |
issn |
1016-765X 2707-966X |
publishDate |
1996-01-01 |
description |
Mainstream economics tends to view its historical process of mathematicization as a „powerful, irresistible current of thought" (Debreu), perfectly motivated by the application of deductive methodology to a quantified object-domain. This interpretation stands in sharp contrast to the historical background of mathematical economics as founded by Leon Walras: the French school of political economy following J.-B. Say combines deductivism with a strong resistance to mathematicization. Rather than simply being an emulation of rational mechanics, Walrasian general equilibrium theory is motivated by natural law issues related to the „social question".
|
url |
https://journals.univie.ac.at/index.php/oezg/article/view/5646 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT danieleckert diesozialefragemoregeometricobeantwortet AT leonhardbauer diesozialefragemoregeometricobeantwortet |
_version_ |
1724215038368022528 |