Hans Jonas, Günther Anders, and the Atomic Priesthood: An Exploration into Ethics, Religion and Technology in the Nuclear Age

This article investigates the ethical implications of the notion of an Atomic Priesthood, an artificially constructed religion built around the preservation of knowledge related to nuclear-waste storage by using the work of Hans Jonas (1903–1993) and Günther Anders (1902–1992). Building on Jonas’ &l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sebastian Musch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-09-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/9/741
id doaj-a390c5a72498430db9150f8adb22515d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a390c5a72498430db9150f8adb22515d2021-09-26T01:13:48ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442021-09-011274174110.3390/rel12090741Hans Jonas, Günther Anders, and the Atomic Priesthood: An Exploration into Ethics, Religion and Technology in the Nuclear AgeSebastian Musch0Department of History, Institute for Migration Research and Intercultural Studies (IMIS), Osnabrück University, 49074 Osnabrück, GermanyThis article investigates the ethical implications of the notion of an Atomic Priesthood, an artificially constructed religion built around the preservation of knowledge related to nuclear-waste storage by using the work of Hans Jonas (1903–1993) and Günther Anders (1902–1992). Building on Jonas’ <i>The Imperative of Responsibility</i> from 1979 and Anders’ <i>The Outdatedness of Human Beings</i> from 1956, this article participates in the debate regarding the ethics of the post-closure marking of nuclear-waste storage sites. Assuming that we have a moral obligation toward future generations, as Jonas argued, even after the nuclear-waste storages have been filled and closed, there remains a need to communicate the danger of these sites to future civilizations to whom our languages and other semiotic systems are incomprehensible. Discussing the hypothetical concept of the Atomic Priesthood, an artificial religion whose central purpose would be to make it taboo to approach certain “impure” sites where our civilization had buried nuclear waste, this article argues that due to the unsolved ethical stakes, technological solutions are unequipped to deal with the long-term ramifications of nuclear power.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/9/741ethicsreligionnuclear wastenuclear agephilosophytransgenerational responsibility
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sebastian Musch
spellingShingle Sebastian Musch
Hans Jonas, Günther Anders, and the Atomic Priesthood: An Exploration into Ethics, Religion and Technology in the Nuclear Age
Religions
ethics
religion
nuclear waste
nuclear age
philosophy
transgenerational responsibility
author_facet Sebastian Musch
author_sort Sebastian Musch
title Hans Jonas, Günther Anders, and the Atomic Priesthood: An Exploration into Ethics, Religion and Technology in the Nuclear Age
title_short Hans Jonas, Günther Anders, and the Atomic Priesthood: An Exploration into Ethics, Religion and Technology in the Nuclear Age
title_full Hans Jonas, Günther Anders, and the Atomic Priesthood: An Exploration into Ethics, Religion and Technology in the Nuclear Age
title_fullStr Hans Jonas, Günther Anders, and the Atomic Priesthood: An Exploration into Ethics, Religion and Technology in the Nuclear Age
title_full_unstemmed Hans Jonas, Günther Anders, and the Atomic Priesthood: An Exploration into Ethics, Religion and Technology in the Nuclear Age
title_sort hans jonas, günther anders, and the atomic priesthood: an exploration into ethics, religion and technology in the nuclear age
publisher MDPI AG
series Religions
issn 2077-1444
publishDate 2021-09-01
description This article investigates the ethical implications of the notion of an Atomic Priesthood, an artificially constructed religion built around the preservation of knowledge related to nuclear-waste storage by using the work of Hans Jonas (1903–1993) and Günther Anders (1902–1992). Building on Jonas’ <i>The Imperative of Responsibility</i> from 1979 and Anders’ <i>The Outdatedness of Human Beings</i> from 1956, this article participates in the debate regarding the ethics of the post-closure marking of nuclear-waste storage sites. Assuming that we have a moral obligation toward future generations, as Jonas argued, even after the nuclear-waste storages have been filled and closed, there remains a need to communicate the danger of these sites to future civilizations to whom our languages and other semiotic systems are incomprehensible. Discussing the hypothetical concept of the Atomic Priesthood, an artificial religion whose central purpose would be to make it taboo to approach certain “impure” sites where our civilization had buried nuclear waste, this article argues that due to the unsolved ethical stakes, technological solutions are unequipped to deal with the long-term ramifications of nuclear power.
topic ethics
religion
nuclear waste
nuclear age
philosophy
transgenerational responsibility
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/9/741
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastianmusch hansjonasguntherandersandtheatomicpriesthoodanexplorationintoethicsreligionandtechnologyinthenuclearage
_version_ 1716869256508866560