Evaluation of the Nomological Validity of Cognitive, Emotional, and Behavioral Factors for the Measurement of Developer Experience

Background: Developer experience should be considered a key factor from the beginning of the use of development platform, but it has not been received much attention in literature. Research Goals: The present study aimed to identify and validate the sub-constructs and item measures in the evaluation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heeyoung Lee, Younghwan Pan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/17/7805
id doaj-a37958cdba854e7bbc9ebc05627683a3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a37958cdba854e7bbc9ebc05627683a32021-09-09T13:38:12ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172021-08-01117805780510.3390/app11177805Evaluation of the Nomological Validity of Cognitive, Emotional, and Behavioral Factors for the Measurement of Developer ExperienceHeeyoung Lee0Younghwan Pan1Department of Smart Experience Design, Kookmin University, Seoul 02707, KoreaDepartment of Smart Experience Design, Kookmin University, Seoul 02707, KoreaBackground: Developer experience should be considered a key factor from the beginning of the use of development platform, but it has not been received much attention in literature. Research Goals: The present study aimed to identify and validate the sub-constructs and item measures in the evaluation of developer experience toward the use of a deep learning platform. Research Methods: A Delphi study as well as a series of statistical methodologies including the assessment of data normality, common method bias, and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were utilized to determine the reliability and validity of a measurement model proposed in the present work. Results: The results indicate that the measurement model proposed in this work successfully ensures the nomological validity of the three second-order constructs of cognitive, affective, and behavioral components to explain the second-order construct of developer experience at <i>p</i> < 0.5 Conclusions: The measurement instrument developed from the current work should be used to measure the developer experience during the use of a deep learning platform. Implication: The results of the current work provide important insights into the academia and practitioners for the understanding of developer experience.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/17/7805developer experiencedeep-learning platformmeasurement modelnomological validity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Heeyoung Lee
Younghwan Pan
spellingShingle Heeyoung Lee
Younghwan Pan
Evaluation of the Nomological Validity of Cognitive, Emotional, and Behavioral Factors for the Measurement of Developer Experience
Applied Sciences
developer experience
deep-learning platform
measurement model
nomological validity
author_facet Heeyoung Lee
Younghwan Pan
author_sort Heeyoung Lee
title Evaluation of the Nomological Validity of Cognitive, Emotional, and Behavioral Factors for the Measurement of Developer Experience
title_short Evaluation of the Nomological Validity of Cognitive, Emotional, and Behavioral Factors for the Measurement of Developer Experience
title_full Evaluation of the Nomological Validity of Cognitive, Emotional, and Behavioral Factors for the Measurement of Developer Experience
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Nomological Validity of Cognitive, Emotional, and Behavioral Factors for the Measurement of Developer Experience
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Nomological Validity of Cognitive, Emotional, and Behavioral Factors for the Measurement of Developer Experience
title_sort evaluation of the nomological validity of cognitive, emotional, and behavioral factors for the measurement of developer experience
publisher MDPI AG
series Applied Sciences
issn 2076-3417
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Background: Developer experience should be considered a key factor from the beginning of the use of development platform, but it has not been received much attention in literature. Research Goals: The present study aimed to identify and validate the sub-constructs and item measures in the evaluation of developer experience toward the use of a deep learning platform. Research Methods: A Delphi study as well as a series of statistical methodologies including the assessment of data normality, common method bias, and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were utilized to determine the reliability and validity of a measurement model proposed in the present work. Results: The results indicate that the measurement model proposed in this work successfully ensures the nomological validity of the three second-order constructs of cognitive, affective, and behavioral components to explain the second-order construct of developer experience at <i>p</i> < 0.5 Conclusions: The measurement instrument developed from the current work should be used to measure the developer experience during the use of a deep learning platform. Implication: The results of the current work provide important insights into the academia and practitioners for the understanding of developer experience.
topic developer experience
deep-learning platform
measurement model
nomological validity
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/17/7805
work_keys_str_mv AT heeyounglee evaluationofthenomologicalvalidityofcognitiveemotionalandbehavioralfactorsforthemeasurementofdeveloperexperience
AT younghwanpan evaluationofthenomologicalvalidityofcognitiveemotionalandbehavioralfactorsforthemeasurementofdeveloperexperience
_version_ 1717760873777332224