Re-Staging the 1934 Abbey Theatre Production of Yeats’s <em>The King of the Great Clock Tower</em>: An Evaluation and Critique

This essay investigates and critiques an attempt from the surviving evidence to re-stage the first performance of Yeats’s The King of the Great Clock Tower at the Abbey Theatre in 1934. This dance-drama was the last of four collaborations between the playwright and the dancer-choreographer, Ninette...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Richard Allen Cave
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Firenze University Press 2013-03-01
Series:Studi Irlandesi : a Journal of Irish Studies
Online Access:https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/bsfm-sijis/article/view/7155
id doaj-a36a02a3d1034a87a2717a6f31409b5c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a36a02a3d1034a87a2717a6f31409b5c2020-11-25T03:10:51ZengFirenze University PressStudi Irlandesi : a Journal of Irish Studies2239-39782013-03-012210.13128/SIJIS-2239-3978-1241610862Re-Staging the 1934 Abbey Theatre Production of Yeats’s <em>The King of the Great Clock Tower</em>: An Evaluation and CritiqueRichard Allen CaveThis essay investigates and critiques an attempt from the surviving evidence to re-stage the first performance of Yeats’s The King of the Great Clock Tower at the Abbey Theatre in 1934. This dance-drama was the last of four collaborations between the playwright and the dancer-choreographer, Ninette de Valois, during the period when she established for him a School of Ballet at the Abbey in Dublin. A wealth of evidence survives from which a performance text (as distinct from the printed text) may be inferred. The limitations to be found in various kinds of extant data concerning performance (music scores, set designs, photographs, revisions to play scripts, reviews, correspondence, reminiscence) are discussed in the light of the writer’s experience of bringing such a re-staging into production. The dangers of overly hypothesising or historicising are examined and devices for negotiating gaps in the evidence while being wholly transparent in one’s efforts are discussed. Finally the essay explores the many and diverse levels of collaboration on which a successful staging of one of Yeats’s dancedramas depends. In the course of that discussion the meaning of the word, collaboration, is interrogated and to some degree re-defined.https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/bsfm-sijis/article/view/7155
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Richard Allen Cave
spellingShingle Richard Allen Cave
Re-Staging the 1934 Abbey Theatre Production of Yeats’s <em>The King of the Great Clock Tower</em>: An Evaluation and Critique
Studi Irlandesi : a Journal of Irish Studies
author_facet Richard Allen Cave
author_sort Richard Allen Cave
title Re-Staging the 1934 Abbey Theatre Production of Yeats’s <em>The King of the Great Clock Tower</em>: An Evaluation and Critique
title_short Re-Staging the 1934 Abbey Theatre Production of Yeats’s <em>The King of the Great Clock Tower</em>: An Evaluation and Critique
title_full Re-Staging the 1934 Abbey Theatre Production of Yeats’s <em>The King of the Great Clock Tower</em>: An Evaluation and Critique
title_fullStr Re-Staging the 1934 Abbey Theatre Production of Yeats’s <em>The King of the Great Clock Tower</em>: An Evaluation and Critique
title_full_unstemmed Re-Staging the 1934 Abbey Theatre Production of Yeats’s <em>The King of the Great Clock Tower</em>: An Evaluation and Critique
title_sort re-staging the 1934 abbey theatre production of yeats’s <em>the king of the great clock tower</em>: an evaluation and critique
publisher Firenze University Press
series Studi Irlandesi : a Journal of Irish Studies
issn 2239-3978
publishDate 2013-03-01
description This essay investigates and critiques an attempt from the surviving evidence to re-stage the first performance of Yeats’s The King of the Great Clock Tower at the Abbey Theatre in 1934. This dance-drama was the last of four collaborations between the playwright and the dancer-choreographer, Ninette de Valois, during the period when she established for him a School of Ballet at the Abbey in Dublin. A wealth of evidence survives from which a performance text (as distinct from the printed text) may be inferred. The limitations to be found in various kinds of extant data concerning performance (music scores, set designs, photographs, revisions to play scripts, reviews, correspondence, reminiscence) are discussed in the light of the writer’s experience of bringing such a re-staging into production. The dangers of overly hypothesising or historicising are examined and devices for negotiating gaps in the evidence while being wholly transparent in one’s efforts are discussed. Finally the essay explores the many and diverse levels of collaboration on which a successful staging of one of Yeats’s dancedramas depends. In the course of that discussion the meaning of the word, collaboration, is interrogated and to some degree re-defined.
url https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/bsfm-sijis/article/view/7155
work_keys_str_mv AT richardallencave restagingthe1934abbeytheatreproductionofyeatssemthekingofthegreatclocktoweremanevaluationandcritique
_version_ 1724656930106900480