Visual Search Revived: The Slopes Are Not That Slippery: A Reply to Kristjansson (2015)
Kristjansson (2015) suggests that standard research methods in the study of visual search should be “reconsidered.” He reiterates a useful warning against treating reaction time x set size functions as simple metrics that can be used to label search tasks as “serial” or “parallel.” However, I argue...
Main Author: | Jeremy M. Wolfe |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2016-05-01
|
Series: | i-Perception |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516643244 |
Similar Items
-
Slippery slope
by: Jorge Vilaça
Published: (2016-06-01) -
The influence of prism adaptation on perceptual and motor components of neglect: A reply to Saevarsson and Kristjansson
by: Christopher eStriemer, et al.
Published: (2013-06-01) -
A Slippery Slope
by: Cardini, Daniela
Published: (2017-09-01) -
Slippery Slopes Revisited
by: Martin Hinton
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Plagiarism: Avoiding the slippery slope
by: David Jonathan Castle
Published: (2012-01-01)