Visual Search Revived: The Slopes Are Not That Slippery: A Reply to Kristjansson (2015)

Kristjansson (2015) suggests that standard research methods in the study of visual search should be “reconsidered.” He reiterates a useful warning against treating reaction time x set size functions as simple metrics that can be used to label search tasks as “serial” or “parallel.” However, I argue...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jeremy M. Wolfe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2016-05-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516643244
id doaj-a36907bb6de44f8390ce09d89f1ba07e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a36907bb6de44f8390ce09d89f1ba07e2020-11-25T03:21:39ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952016-05-01710.1177/204166951664324410.1177_2041669516643244Visual Search Revived: The Slopes Are Not That Slippery: A Reply to Kristjansson (2015)Jeremy M. WolfeKristjansson (2015) suggests that standard research methods in the study of visual search should be “reconsidered.” He reiterates a useful warning against treating reaction time x set size functions as simple metrics that can be used to label search tasks as “serial” or “parallel.” However, I argue that he goes too far with a broad attack on the use of slopes in the study of visual search. Used wisely, slopes do provide us with insight into the mechanisms of visual search.https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516643244
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jeremy M. Wolfe
spellingShingle Jeremy M. Wolfe
Visual Search Revived: The Slopes Are Not That Slippery: A Reply to Kristjansson (2015)
i-Perception
author_facet Jeremy M. Wolfe
author_sort Jeremy M. Wolfe
title Visual Search Revived: The Slopes Are Not That Slippery: A Reply to Kristjansson (2015)
title_short Visual Search Revived: The Slopes Are Not That Slippery: A Reply to Kristjansson (2015)
title_full Visual Search Revived: The Slopes Are Not That Slippery: A Reply to Kristjansson (2015)
title_fullStr Visual Search Revived: The Slopes Are Not That Slippery: A Reply to Kristjansson (2015)
title_full_unstemmed Visual Search Revived: The Slopes Are Not That Slippery: A Reply to Kristjansson (2015)
title_sort visual search revived: the slopes are not that slippery: a reply to kristjansson (2015)
publisher SAGE Publishing
series i-Perception
issn 2041-6695
publishDate 2016-05-01
description Kristjansson (2015) suggests that standard research methods in the study of visual search should be “reconsidered.” He reiterates a useful warning against treating reaction time x set size functions as simple metrics that can be used to label search tasks as “serial” or “parallel.” However, I argue that he goes too far with a broad attack on the use of slopes in the study of visual search. Used wisely, slopes do provide us with insight into the mechanisms of visual search.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516643244
work_keys_str_mv AT jeremymwolfe visualsearchrevivedtheslopesarenotthatslipperyareplytokristjansson2015
_version_ 1724613428199292928