Imaging predictive factors and exercise training in CRT patients

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe chronic heart failure (CHF) and intraventricular conduction delay, which is identified by a QRS interval of 120msec or more on a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). CRT improved functional capacity...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ana Abreu, Helena Santa Clara
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PAGEPress Publications 2016-10-01
Series:Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.monaldi-archives.org/index.php/macd/article/view/760
id doaj-a360745291cc40f1b6d0a1ee9d990df7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a360745291cc40f1b6d0a1ee9d990df72020-11-25T02:46:21ZengPAGEPress PublicationsMonaldi Archives for Chest Disease1122-06432532-52642016-10-01861-210.4081/monaldi.2016.760Imaging predictive factors and exercise training in CRT patientsAna Abreu0Helena Santa Clara1Hospital Santa MartaHospital Santa Marta Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe chronic heart failure (CHF) and intraventricular conduction delay, which is identified by a QRS interval of 120msec or more on a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). CRT improved functional capacity, reduced hospitalizations for worsening CHF and increased survival. However, about 30-40% of patients who underwent CRT were non-responders with no clinical or echocardiographic improvement. Imaging parameters for prediction of CRT response have been reviewed. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), recognized as the gold standard to assess viability, has shown to obtain good results regarding quantification of scar burden. CMR-derived measures of mechanical dyssynchrony appear to predict the outcome of CRT, however they have not been externally validated. Nuclear imaging techniques, namely single-photon emission cardiac tomography (SPECT) provide data on scar burden and location, left ventricular (LV) function, LV contraction and mechanical dyssynchrony from a single scan. The presence, location and burden of myocardial scar have been shown to affect response to CRT. However, compared to CMR, the low spatial resolution of scintigraphy might overestimate the scar extent. This problem can be overcome by positron emission tomography (PET). SPECT has also been used to quantify dyssynchrony, using phase analysis. Imaging investigation is ongoing, trying to better identifying CRT non-responders. The combination of ExT in CRT has not been well investigated; however some data show different aerobic exercise modes and intensities can further improve CRT benefits. Data available on the effects of ExT in patients with CRT have been reviewed. https://www.monaldi-archives.org/index.php/macd/article/view/760Cardiac resynchronization therapyimaging techniquesexercise trainingchronic heart failure.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ana Abreu
Helena Santa Clara
spellingShingle Ana Abreu
Helena Santa Clara
Imaging predictive factors and exercise training in CRT patients
Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease
Cardiac resynchronization therapy
imaging techniques
exercise training
chronic heart failure.
author_facet Ana Abreu
Helena Santa Clara
author_sort Ana Abreu
title Imaging predictive factors and exercise training in CRT patients
title_short Imaging predictive factors and exercise training in CRT patients
title_full Imaging predictive factors and exercise training in CRT patients
title_fullStr Imaging predictive factors and exercise training in CRT patients
title_full_unstemmed Imaging predictive factors and exercise training in CRT patients
title_sort imaging predictive factors and exercise training in crt patients
publisher PAGEPress Publications
series Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease
issn 1122-0643
2532-5264
publishDate 2016-10-01
description Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe chronic heart failure (CHF) and intraventricular conduction delay, which is identified by a QRS interval of 120msec or more on a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). CRT improved functional capacity, reduced hospitalizations for worsening CHF and increased survival. However, about 30-40% of patients who underwent CRT were non-responders with no clinical or echocardiographic improvement. Imaging parameters for prediction of CRT response have been reviewed. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), recognized as the gold standard to assess viability, has shown to obtain good results regarding quantification of scar burden. CMR-derived measures of mechanical dyssynchrony appear to predict the outcome of CRT, however they have not been externally validated. Nuclear imaging techniques, namely single-photon emission cardiac tomography (SPECT) provide data on scar burden and location, left ventricular (LV) function, LV contraction and mechanical dyssynchrony from a single scan. The presence, location and burden of myocardial scar have been shown to affect response to CRT. However, compared to CMR, the low spatial resolution of scintigraphy might overestimate the scar extent. This problem can be overcome by positron emission tomography (PET). SPECT has also been used to quantify dyssynchrony, using phase analysis. Imaging investigation is ongoing, trying to better identifying CRT non-responders. The combination of ExT in CRT has not been well investigated; however some data show different aerobic exercise modes and intensities can further improve CRT benefits. Data available on the effects of ExT in patients with CRT have been reviewed.
topic Cardiac resynchronization therapy
imaging techniques
exercise training
chronic heart failure.
url https://www.monaldi-archives.org/index.php/macd/article/view/760
work_keys_str_mv AT anaabreu imagingpredictivefactorsandexercisetrainingincrtpatients
AT helenasantaclara imagingpredictivefactorsandexercisetrainingincrtpatients
_version_ 1724758985615081472