Endplate Changes with Polyetheretherketone Cages in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Study Design A retrospective radiographic analysis. Purpose The aim of the current study is to assess endplate changes after the use of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Overview of Literature A few recent reports had revealed endplate abnormalities due t...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korean Spine Society
2020-04-01
|
Series: | Asian Spine Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-2019-0124.pdf |
id |
doaj-a34ff18248494889aa3a78a6573357a0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a34ff18248494889aa3a78a6573357a02020-11-25T03:35:28ZengKorean Spine SocietyAsian Spine Journal1976-19021976-78462020-04-0114222923710.31616/asj.2019.01241137Endplate Changes with Polyetheretherketone Cages in Posterior Lumbar Interbody FusionTarek Anwar Elfiky0Nirmal Dhananjay Patil1Yasser Allam2Raafat Ragab3 Spine Unit, Al-Hadra University Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt Department of Orthopaedics, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India Spine Unit, Al-Hadra University Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt Spine Unit, Al-Hadra University Hospital, Alexandria, EgyptStudy Design A retrospective radiographic analysis. Purpose The aim of the current study is to assess endplate changes after the use of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Overview of Literature A few recent reports had revealed endplate abnormalities due to PEEK cages, which may lead to nonunions. Methods A retrospective computed tomography (CT)-based analysis of the endplate cavities and fusion status following PLIFs with PEEK cages was conducted by two independent observers. The term “cavity” was used to describe the endplate changes. The vertebral endplate cavities were assessed according to the size, multiplicity, location, and presence or absence of sclerosis. Results There were 86 fixed levels in 65 consecutive patients, with a mean age of 35.44±19.60 years. The mean follow-up was 16.5±10.1 months (range, 6–57 months). Definite fusion was seen in 56 levels (65.12%) by observer 1 versus 44 levels (51.16) by observer 2. The strength of agreement was moderate. Endplate cavities were observed in 42 levels (48.84%) by observer 1 versus 47 levels (54.65%) by observer 2, with fair agreement. The strengths of agreement for the locations, multiplicity, and size were moderate, fair, and poor, respectively. Neither age, sex, etiology, levels, nor follow-up period was significantly associated with the presence of cavities. With regard to fusions, the nonunions detected by observer 1 were significantly associated with the presence of cavities (p<0.0001). However, those detected by observer 2 were nearly significant (p=0.05). Conclusions There was a high rate of unfavorable radiographic findings in the form of endplate cavities in PLIF cases with PEEK cages. A more comprehensive classification for the assessment of fusions and endplate cavities should be formulated. We strongly recommend further CT-based studies with larger sample size and longer follow-up periods.http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-2019-0124.pdfinterbodyfusionpolyetheretherketoneend plate changescavities |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Tarek Anwar Elfiky Nirmal Dhananjay Patil Yasser Allam Raafat Ragab |
spellingShingle |
Tarek Anwar Elfiky Nirmal Dhananjay Patil Yasser Allam Raafat Ragab Endplate Changes with Polyetheretherketone Cages in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Asian Spine Journal interbody fusion polyetheretherketone end plate changes cavities |
author_facet |
Tarek Anwar Elfiky Nirmal Dhananjay Patil Yasser Allam Raafat Ragab |
author_sort |
Tarek Anwar Elfiky |
title |
Endplate Changes with Polyetheretherketone Cages in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion |
title_short |
Endplate Changes with Polyetheretherketone Cages in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion |
title_full |
Endplate Changes with Polyetheretherketone Cages in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion |
title_fullStr |
Endplate Changes with Polyetheretherketone Cages in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion |
title_full_unstemmed |
Endplate Changes with Polyetheretherketone Cages in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion |
title_sort |
endplate changes with polyetheretherketone cages in posterior lumbar interbody fusion |
publisher |
Korean Spine Society |
series |
Asian Spine Journal |
issn |
1976-1902 1976-7846 |
publishDate |
2020-04-01 |
description |
Study Design A retrospective radiographic analysis. Purpose The aim of the current study is to assess endplate changes after the use of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Overview of Literature A few recent reports had revealed endplate abnormalities due to PEEK cages, which may lead to nonunions. Methods A retrospective computed tomography (CT)-based analysis of the endplate cavities and fusion status following PLIFs with PEEK cages was conducted by two independent observers. The term “cavity” was used to describe the endplate changes. The vertebral endplate cavities were assessed according to the size, multiplicity, location, and presence or absence of sclerosis. Results There were 86 fixed levels in 65 consecutive patients, with a mean age of 35.44±19.60 years. The mean follow-up was 16.5±10.1 months (range, 6–57 months). Definite fusion was seen in 56 levels (65.12%) by observer 1 versus 44 levels (51.16) by observer 2. The strength of agreement was moderate. Endplate cavities were observed in 42 levels (48.84%) by observer 1 versus 47 levels (54.65%) by observer 2, with fair agreement. The strengths of agreement for the locations, multiplicity, and size were moderate, fair, and poor, respectively. Neither age, sex, etiology, levels, nor follow-up period was significantly associated with the presence of cavities. With regard to fusions, the nonunions detected by observer 1 were significantly associated with the presence of cavities (p<0.0001). However, those detected by observer 2 were nearly significant (p=0.05). Conclusions There was a high rate of unfavorable radiographic findings in the form of endplate cavities in PLIF cases with PEEK cages. A more comprehensive classification for the assessment of fusions and endplate cavities should be formulated. We strongly recommend further CT-based studies with larger sample size and longer follow-up periods. |
topic |
interbody fusion polyetheretherketone end plate changes cavities |
url |
http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-2019-0124.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tarekanwarelfiky endplatechangeswithpolyetheretherketonecagesinposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusion AT nirmaldhananjaypatil endplatechangeswithpolyetheretherketonecagesinposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusion AT yasserallam endplatechangeswithpolyetheretherketonecagesinposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusion AT raafatragab endplatechangeswithpolyetheretherketonecagesinposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusion |
_version_ |
1724554288723656704 |