How does the supervision stringency affect systemic risk based on the differential dynamic model?
This paper focused on the supervision stringency and studied its impact on the financial system risk contagion mechanism. This paper adopts Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Recovered epidemical model and sets supervision stringency as the principal parameter. The model was formed by a differential equat...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Systems Science & Control Engineering |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642583.2019.1681031 |
id |
doaj-a34ef704cf8b4236b178a0739ef156b1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a34ef704cf8b4236b178a0739ef156b12020-11-25T01:58:18ZengTaylor & Francis GroupSystems Science & Control Engineering2164-25832019-01-017135736810.1080/21642583.2019.16810311681031How does the supervision stringency affect systemic risk based on the differential dynamic model?Bian Chenyu0Yang Haomiao1Zhang Ning2Peking UniversityCentral University of Finance and EconomicsCentral University of Finance and EconomicsThis paper focused on the supervision stringency and studied its impact on the financial system risk contagion mechanism. This paper adopts Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Recovered epidemical model and sets supervision stringency as the principal parameter. The model was formed by a differential equation set and financial system are set with Susceptible group, Exposed group, Infectious A, Infectious B, and Removed group. Based on the theoretical research, this paper gave the steady-state solution and the robust conditions for equilibrium. The conclusion is that in a short time, a small portion of Susceptible group and Exposed group will become Removed group, while a big portion rapidly becomes Infectious A, B. The rate and quantity of other institutions infected is much higher than systematically important financial institutions. Meanwhile, it is known that enhancing supervision stringency is instrumental in alleviating risk spill-over effect of other institutions and risk contagion among institutions. Under system equilibrium, the number of infectious institutions gradually decreases with supervision stringency increasing. Furthermore, the appropriate enhancement of supervision stringency can avoid risk eruption, whereas risk contagion could outbreak if supervision was overstringent.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642583.2019.1681031Systematic risksupervision stringencydifferential dynamic equilibrium |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bian Chenyu Yang Haomiao Zhang Ning |
spellingShingle |
Bian Chenyu Yang Haomiao Zhang Ning How does the supervision stringency affect systemic risk based on the differential dynamic model? Systems Science & Control Engineering Systematic risk supervision stringency differential dynamic equilibrium |
author_facet |
Bian Chenyu Yang Haomiao Zhang Ning |
author_sort |
Bian Chenyu |
title |
How does the supervision stringency affect systemic risk based on the differential dynamic model? |
title_short |
How does the supervision stringency affect systemic risk based on the differential dynamic model? |
title_full |
How does the supervision stringency affect systemic risk based on the differential dynamic model? |
title_fullStr |
How does the supervision stringency affect systemic risk based on the differential dynamic model? |
title_full_unstemmed |
How does the supervision stringency affect systemic risk based on the differential dynamic model? |
title_sort |
how does the supervision stringency affect systemic risk based on the differential dynamic model? |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
series |
Systems Science & Control Engineering |
issn |
2164-2583 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
This paper focused on the supervision stringency and studied its impact on the financial system risk contagion mechanism. This paper adopts Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Recovered epidemical model and sets supervision stringency as the principal parameter. The model was formed by a differential equation set and financial system are set with Susceptible group, Exposed group, Infectious A, Infectious B, and Removed group. Based on the theoretical research, this paper gave the steady-state solution and the robust conditions for equilibrium. The conclusion is that in a short time, a small portion of Susceptible group and Exposed group will become Removed group, while a big portion rapidly becomes Infectious A, B. The rate and quantity of other institutions infected is much higher than systematically important financial institutions. Meanwhile, it is known that enhancing supervision stringency is instrumental in alleviating risk spill-over effect of other institutions and risk contagion among institutions. Under system equilibrium, the number of infectious institutions gradually decreases with supervision stringency increasing. Furthermore, the appropriate enhancement of supervision stringency can avoid risk eruption, whereas risk contagion could outbreak if supervision was overstringent. |
topic |
Systematic risk supervision stringency differential dynamic equilibrium |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642583.2019.1681031 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bianchenyu howdoesthesupervisionstringencyaffectsystemicriskbasedonthedifferentialdynamicmodel AT yanghaomiao howdoesthesupervisionstringencyaffectsystemicriskbasedonthedifferentialdynamicmodel AT zhangning howdoesthesupervisionstringencyaffectsystemicriskbasedonthedifferentialdynamicmodel |
_version_ |
1724970463546834944 |