Efficiency and safety of inhalative sedation with sevoflurane in comparison to an intravenous sedation concept with propofol in intensive care patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>State of the art sedation concepts on intensive care units (ICU) favor propofol for a time period of up to 72 h and midazolam for long-term sedation. However, intravenous sedation is associated with complications such as development...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2012-08-01
|
Series: | Trials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/13/1/135 |
id |
doaj-a34eedb11ded4b8bae31410c02dcb3f4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a34eedb11ded4b8bae31410c02dcb3f42020-11-25T01:32:41ZengBMCTrials1745-62152012-08-0113113510.1186/1745-6215-13-135Efficiency and safety of inhalative sedation with sevoflurane in comparison to an intravenous sedation concept with propofol in intensive care patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trialSoukup JensSelle AntjeWienke AndreasSteighardt JörgWagner Nana-MariaKellner Patrick<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>State of the art sedation concepts on intensive care units (ICU) favor propofol for a time period of up to 72 h and midazolam for long-term sedation. However, intravenous sedation is associated with complications such as development of tolerance, insufficient sedation quality, gastrointestinal paralysis, and withdrawal symptoms including cognitive deficits. Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether sevoflurane as a volatile anesthetic technically implemented by the anesthetic-conserving device (ACD) may provide advantages regarding ‘weaning time’, efficiency, and patient’s safety when compared to standard intravenous sedation employing propofol.</p> <p>Method/Design</p> <p>This currently ongoing trial is designed as a two-armed, monocentric, randomized prospective phase II study including intubated intensive care patients with an expected necessity for sedation exceeding 48 h. Patients are randomly assigned to either receive intravenous sedation with propofol or sevoflurane employing the ACD. Primary endpoint is the comparison of the ‘weaning time’ defined as the time required from discontinuation of the sedating agent until sufficient spontaneous breathing occurs. Moreover, sedation depth evaluated by Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale and parameters of patient’s safety (that is, vital signs, laboratory monitoring of organ function) as well as the duration of mechanical ventilation and overall stay on the ICU are analyzed and compared. An intention-to-treat analysis will be carried out with all patients for whom it will be possible to define a wake-up time. In addition, a per-protocol analysis is envisaged. Completion of patient recruitment is expected by the end of 2012.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This clinical study is designed to evaluate the impact of sevoflurane during long-term sedation of critically ill patients on ‘weaning time’, efficiency, and patient’s safety compared to the standard intravenous sedation concept employing propofol.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>EudraCT2007-006087-30; ISCRTN90609144</p> http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/13/1/135Inhalative sedationIntravenous sedationIntensive careSevoflurane |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Soukup Jens Selle Antje Wienke Andreas Steighardt Jörg Wagner Nana-Maria Kellner Patrick |
spellingShingle |
Soukup Jens Selle Antje Wienke Andreas Steighardt Jörg Wagner Nana-Maria Kellner Patrick Efficiency and safety of inhalative sedation with sevoflurane in comparison to an intravenous sedation concept with propofol in intensive care patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Trials Inhalative sedation Intravenous sedation Intensive care Sevoflurane |
author_facet |
Soukup Jens Selle Antje Wienke Andreas Steighardt Jörg Wagner Nana-Maria Kellner Patrick |
author_sort |
Soukup Jens |
title |
Efficiency and safety of inhalative sedation with sevoflurane in comparison to an intravenous sedation concept with propofol in intensive care patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short |
Efficiency and safety of inhalative sedation with sevoflurane in comparison to an intravenous sedation concept with propofol in intensive care patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full |
Efficiency and safety of inhalative sedation with sevoflurane in comparison to an intravenous sedation concept with propofol in intensive care patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr |
Efficiency and safety of inhalative sedation with sevoflurane in comparison to an intravenous sedation concept with propofol in intensive care patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Efficiency and safety of inhalative sedation with sevoflurane in comparison to an intravenous sedation concept with propofol in intensive care patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort |
efficiency and safety of inhalative sedation with sevoflurane in comparison to an intravenous sedation concept with propofol in intensive care patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Trials |
issn |
1745-6215 |
publishDate |
2012-08-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>State of the art sedation concepts on intensive care units (ICU) favor propofol for a time period of up to 72 h and midazolam for long-term sedation. However, intravenous sedation is associated with complications such as development of tolerance, insufficient sedation quality, gastrointestinal paralysis, and withdrawal symptoms including cognitive deficits. Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether sevoflurane as a volatile anesthetic technically implemented by the anesthetic-conserving device (ACD) may provide advantages regarding ‘weaning time’, efficiency, and patient’s safety when compared to standard intravenous sedation employing propofol.</p> <p>Method/Design</p> <p>This currently ongoing trial is designed as a two-armed, monocentric, randomized prospective phase II study including intubated intensive care patients with an expected necessity for sedation exceeding 48 h. Patients are randomly assigned to either receive intravenous sedation with propofol or sevoflurane employing the ACD. Primary endpoint is the comparison of the ‘weaning time’ defined as the time required from discontinuation of the sedating agent until sufficient spontaneous breathing occurs. Moreover, sedation depth evaluated by Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale and parameters of patient’s safety (that is, vital signs, laboratory monitoring of organ function) as well as the duration of mechanical ventilation and overall stay on the ICU are analyzed and compared. An intention-to-treat analysis will be carried out with all patients for whom it will be possible to define a wake-up time. In addition, a per-protocol analysis is envisaged. Completion of patient recruitment is expected by the end of 2012.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This clinical study is designed to evaluate the impact of sevoflurane during long-term sedation of critically ill patients on ‘weaning time’, efficiency, and patient’s safety compared to the standard intravenous sedation concept employing propofol.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>EudraCT2007-006087-30; ISCRTN90609144</p> |
topic |
Inhalative sedation Intravenous sedation Intensive care Sevoflurane |
url |
http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/13/1/135 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT soukupjens efficiencyandsafetyofinhalativesedationwithsevofluraneincomparisontoanintravenoussedationconceptwithpropofolinintensivecarepatientsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT selleantje efficiencyandsafetyofinhalativesedationwithsevofluraneincomparisontoanintravenoussedationconceptwithpropofolinintensivecarepatientsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wienkeandreas efficiencyandsafetyofinhalativesedationwithsevofluraneincomparisontoanintravenoussedationconceptwithpropofolinintensivecarepatientsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT steighardtjorg efficiencyandsafetyofinhalativesedationwithsevofluraneincomparisontoanintravenoussedationconceptwithpropofolinintensivecarepatientsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wagnernanamaria efficiencyandsafetyofinhalativesedationwithsevofluraneincomparisontoanintravenoussedationconceptwithpropofolinintensivecarepatientsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kellnerpatrick efficiencyandsafetyofinhalativesedationwithsevofluraneincomparisontoanintravenoussedationconceptwithpropofolinintensivecarepatientsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |
_version_ |
1725080473289359360 |