Memories of Visual Events Can Be Formed Without Specific Spatial Coordinates

To what extent does specific spatiotopic location accompany the remembered representation of a visual event? Feature integration theory suggests that identifying a multi-feature object requires focusing on its spatial location to integrate those features. Moreover, single unit data from anterior ven...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shekoofeh Hedayati, Brad Wyble
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2020-06-01
Series:Journal of Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/104
id doaj-a33e52d490a040ab877ec0932c4542ef
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a33e52d490a040ab877ec0932c4542ef2020-11-25T03:36:59ZengUbiquity PressJournal of Cognition2514-48202020-06-013110.5334/joc.104100Memories of Visual Events Can Be Formed Without Specific Spatial CoordinatesShekoofeh Hedayati0Brad Wyble1Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PADepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PATo what extent does specific spatiotopic location accompany the remembered representation of a visual event? Feature integration theory suggests that identifying a multi-feature object requires focusing on its spatial location to integrate those features. Moreover, single unit data from anterior ventral stream neurons that fire preferentially to complex objects indicates that they have retinotopic receptive fields. It can, therefore, be predicted that location information of features of a complex stimulus is inherent in the memory of a perceived visual stimulus’ representation. To evaluate this prediction, we presented participants with a brief array of characters with instructions to identify and locate the solitary letter among a set of digits. Surprisingly, analysis of trials in which the target identity was accurately reported indicated that in more than 15% of trials (i.e., in Experiments 2b & 2c) participants were almost completely uninformed about the location of the letter that they had just identified. Further analysis showed that there were two main sources of these location errors; misbinding the target to the distractors’ locations and extremely poor spatial representation of the target’s location to an extent that was indistinguishable from guessing. The latter finding indicates that consciously accessible representations of visual events can form despite being untethered to robust and spatially-specific representations, implying that the specific location was either not quite encoded into working memory, or was rapidly forgotten. However, when the target was marked by a single feature (color), there was no evidence of remembering the target identity without remembering its location even with strong masking.https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/104visual bindingspatial locationvisual searchawareness
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shekoofeh Hedayati
Brad Wyble
spellingShingle Shekoofeh Hedayati
Brad Wyble
Memories of Visual Events Can Be Formed Without Specific Spatial Coordinates
Journal of Cognition
visual binding
spatial location
visual search
awareness
author_facet Shekoofeh Hedayati
Brad Wyble
author_sort Shekoofeh Hedayati
title Memories of Visual Events Can Be Formed Without Specific Spatial Coordinates
title_short Memories of Visual Events Can Be Formed Without Specific Spatial Coordinates
title_full Memories of Visual Events Can Be Formed Without Specific Spatial Coordinates
title_fullStr Memories of Visual Events Can Be Formed Without Specific Spatial Coordinates
title_full_unstemmed Memories of Visual Events Can Be Formed Without Specific Spatial Coordinates
title_sort memories of visual events can be formed without specific spatial coordinates
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Journal of Cognition
issn 2514-4820
publishDate 2020-06-01
description To what extent does specific spatiotopic location accompany the remembered representation of a visual event? Feature integration theory suggests that identifying a multi-feature object requires focusing on its spatial location to integrate those features. Moreover, single unit data from anterior ventral stream neurons that fire preferentially to complex objects indicates that they have retinotopic receptive fields. It can, therefore, be predicted that location information of features of a complex stimulus is inherent in the memory of a perceived visual stimulus’ representation. To evaluate this prediction, we presented participants with a brief array of characters with instructions to identify and locate the solitary letter among a set of digits. Surprisingly, analysis of trials in which the target identity was accurately reported indicated that in more than 15% of trials (i.e., in Experiments 2b & 2c) participants were almost completely uninformed about the location of the letter that they had just identified. Further analysis showed that there were two main sources of these location errors; misbinding the target to the distractors’ locations and extremely poor spatial representation of the target’s location to an extent that was indistinguishable from guessing. The latter finding indicates that consciously accessible representations of visual events can form despite being untethered to robust and spatially-specific representations, implying that the specific location was either not quite encoded into working memory, or was rapidly forgotten. However, when the target was marked by a single feature (color), there was no evidence of remembering the target identity without remembering its location even with strong masking.
topic visual binding
spatial location
visual search
awareness
url https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/104
work_keys_str_mv AT shekoofehhedayati memoriesofvisualeventscanbeformedwithoutspecificspatialcoordinates
AT bradwyble memoriesofvisualeventscanbeformedwithoutspecificspatialcoordinates
_version_ 1724547696266575872