Passage of time judgments are not duration judgments: Evidence from a study using Experience Sampling Methodology
This study examined relations between passage of time judgments and duration judgments in everyday life, in young and elderly people, with an Experience Sampling Method (ESM). The duration judgments were assessed by verbal estimation and interval production measures. The results showed no difference...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016-02-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00176/full |
id |
doaj-a33b67c6ce98422da52f3a72da6d1805 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a33b67c6ce98422da52f3a72da6d18052020-11-24T23:41:36ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782016-02-01710.3389/fpsyg.2016.00176172884Passage of time judgments are not duration judgments: Evidence from a study using Experience Sampling MethodologySYLVIE eDROIT-VOLET0John eWearden1Université Clermont AuvergneUniversity of KeeleThis study examined relations between passage of time judgments and duration judgments in everyday life, in young and elderly people, with an Experience Sampling Method (ESM). The duration judgments were assessed by verbal estimation and interval production measures. The results showed no difference between young and elderly people in judgments of rate of passage of time, a result contrary to the conventional idea that time passes more quickly as we get older. There were also no significant relation between the judgment of passage of time and the judgments of durations. In addition, the significant predictors of individual differences in the judgment of passage of time (emotion states and focus of attention on the current activity) were not predictors of judgment of durations. In sum, passage of time judgments are not related to duration judgments.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00176/fullTime PerceptionElderlyPassage of timetimeExperience sampling methodology |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
SYLVIE eDROIT-VOLET John eWearden |
spellingShingle |
SYLVIE eDROIT-VOLET John eWearden Passage of time judgments are not duration judgments: Evidence from a study using Experience Sampling Methodology Frontiers in Psychology Time Perception Elderly Passage of time time Experience sampling methodology |
author_facet |
SYLVIE eDROIT-VOLET John eWearden |
author_sort |
SYLVIE eDROIT-VOLET |
title |
Passage of time judgments are not duration judgments: Evidence from a study using Experience Sampling Methodology |
title_short |
Passage of time judgments are not duration judgments: Evidence from a study using Experience Sampling Methodology |
title_full |
Passage of time judgments are not duration judgments: Evidence from a study using Experience Sampling Methodology |
title_fullStr |
Passage of time judgments are not duration judgments: Evidence from a study using Experience Sampling Methodology |
title_full_unstemmed |
Passage of time judgments are not duration judgments: Evidence from a study using Experience Sampling Methodology |
title_sort |
passage of time judgments are not duration judgments: evidence from a study using experience sampling methodology |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2016-02-01 |
description |
This study examined relations between passage of time judgments and duration judgments in everyday life, in young and elderly people, with an Experience Sampling Method (ESM). The duration judgments were assessed by verbal estimation and interval production measures. The results showed no difference between young and elderly people in judgments of rate of passage of time, a result contrary to the conventional idea that time passes more quickly as we get older. There were also no significant relation between the judgment of passage of time and the judgments of durations. In addition, the significant predictors of individual differences in the judgment of passage of time (emotion states and focus of attention on the current activity) were not predictors of judgment of durations. In sum, passage of time judgments are not related to duration judgments. |
topic |
Time Perception Elderly Passage of time time Experience sampling methodology |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00176/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sylvieedroitvolet passageoftimejudgmentsarenotdurationjudgmentsevidencefromastudyusingexperiencesamplingmethodology AT johnewearden passageoftimejudgmentsarenotdurationjudgmentsevidencefromastudyusingexperiencesamplingmethodology |
_version_ |
1725506394088538112 |