Passage of time judgments are not duration judgments: Evidence from a study using Experience Sampling Methodology

This study examined relations between passage of time judgments and duration judgments in everyday life, in young and elderly people, with an Experience Sampling Method (ESM). The duration judgments were assessed by verbal estimation and interval production measures. The results showed no difference...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: SYLVIE eDROIT-VOLET, John eWearden
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00176/full
id doaj-a33b67c6ce98422da52f3a72da6d1805
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a33b67c6ce98422da52f3a72da6d18052020-11-24T23:41:36ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782016-02-01710.3389/fpsyg.2016.00176172884Passage of time judgments are not duration judgments: Evidence from a study using Experience Sampling MethodologySYLVIE eDROIT-VOLET0John eWearden1Université Clermont AuvergneUniversity of KeeleThis study examined relations between passage of time judgments and duration judgments in everyday life, in young and elderly people, with an Experience Sampling Method (ESM). The duration judgments were assessed by verbal estimation and interval production measures. The results showed no difference between young and elderly people in judgments of rate of passage of time, a result contrary to the conventional idea that time passes more quickly as we get older. There were also no significant relation between the judgment of passage of time and the judgments of durations. In addition, the significant predictors of individual differences in the judgment of passage of time (emotion states and focus of attention on the current activity) were not predictors of judgment of durations. In sum, passage of time judgments are not related to duration judgments.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00176/fullTime PerceptionElderlyPassage of timetimeExperience sampling methodology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author SYLVIE eDROIT-VOLET
John eWearden
spellingShingle SYLVIE eDROIT-VOLET
John eWearden
Passage of time judgments are not duration judgments: Evidence from a study using Experience Sampling Methodology
Frontiers in Psychology
Time Perception
Elderly
Passage of time
time
Experience sampling methodology
author_facet SYLVIE eDROIT-VOLET
John eWearden
author_sort SYLVIE eDROIT-VOLET
title Passage of time judgments are not duration judgments: Evidence from a study using Experience Sampling Methodology
title_short Passage of time judgments are not duration judgments: Evidence from a study using Experience Sampling Methodology
title_full Passage of time judgments are not duration judgments: Evidence from a study using Experience Sampling Methodology
title_fullStr Passage of time judgments are not duration judgments: Evidence from a study using Experience Sampling Methodology
title_full_unstemmed Passage of time judgments are not duration judgments: Evidence from a study using Experience Sampling Methodology
title_sort passage of time judgments are not duration judgments: evidence from a study using experience sampling methodology
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2016-02-01
description This study examined relations between passage of time judgments and duration judgments in everyday life, in young and elderly people, with an Experience Sampling Method (ESM). The duration judgments were assessed by verbal estimation and interval production measures. The results showed no difference between young and elderly people in judgments of rate of passage of time, a result contrary to the conventional idea that time passes more quickly as we get older. There were also no significant relation between the judgment of passage of time and the judgments of durations. In addition, the significant predictors of individual differences in the judgment of passage of time (emotion states and focus of attention on the current activity) were not predictors of judgment of durations. In sum, passage of time judgments are not related to duration judgments.
topic Time Perception
Elderly
Passage of time
time
Experience sampling methodology
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00176/full
work_keys_str_mv AT sylvieedroitvolet passageoftimejudgmentsarenotdurationjudgmentsevidencefromastudyusingexperiencesamplingmethodology
AT johnewearden passageoftimejudgmentsarenotdurationjudgmentsevidencefromastudyusingexperiencesamplingmethodology
_version_ 1725506394088538112