When 'you' isn’t you: The attraction of self-ascription in children’s interpretation of pronouns in reported speech
In language comprehension, 'you 'is a 'de se 'pronoun, which means that its interpretation is guided by a simple 'de se 'rule ('you '= self-ascription by addressee), while the interpretation of other pronouns requires more complicated reasoning. This predicts...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Open Library of Humanities
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Glossa |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/187 |
id |
doaj-a3209b284c35403a95739d70cd208ae6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a3209b284c35403a95739d70cd208ae62021-09-02T02:42:32ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesGlossa2397-18352017-01-012110.5334/gjgl.18754When 'you' isn’t you: The attraction of self-ascription in children’s interpretation of pronouns in reported speechFranziska Köder0Emar Maier1Centre for the Study of Mind in Nature (CSMN), University of OsloFaculty of Philosophy, University of GroningenIn language comprehension, 'you 'is a 'de se 'pronoun, which means that its interpretation is guided by a simple 'de se 'rule ('you '= self-ascription by addressee), while the interpretation of other pronouns requires more complicated reasoning. This predicts that 'you 'should be easier to process than 'I 'or 'he', especially for children. But not all occurrences of 'you 'can be correctly interpreted via self-ascription. We consider two cases where 'you 'does not indicate self-ascription: interpretation as an eavesdropper and direct speech. In our experiment, we compare children’s interpretation of the pronouns 'I', 'you 'and 'he', in both direct and indirect reported speech, and in both addressee and eavesdropping situations. We tested 71 five-year-olds, 63 nine-year-olds, and 52 adults in a referent-selection task and found a clear 'de se 'effect for children when directly addressed: they performed better with 'you 'than with 'I'/'he 'in indirect speech, but worse with 'you 'than with 'I'/'he 'in direct speech. We explain the latter finding in terms of the attraction of the 'de se 'interpretation strategy, which leads addressees to automatically self-ascribe 'you 'even in a direct speech report.http://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/187'de se'second personpronoun interpretationchild languagedirect and indirect reported speech |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Franziska Köder Emar Maier |
spellingShingle |
Franziska Köder Emar Maier When 'you' isn’t you: The attraction of self-ascription in children’s interpretation of pronouns in reported speech Glossa 'de se' second person pronoun interpretation child language direct and indirect reported speech |
author_facet |
Franziska Köder Emar Maier |
author_sort |
Franziska Köder |
title |
When 'you' isn’t you: The attraction of self-ascription in children’s interpretation of pronouns in reported speech |
title_short |
When 'you' isn’t you: The attraction of self-ascription in children’s interpretation of pronouns in reported speech |
title_full |
When 'you' isn’t you: The attraction of self-ascription in children’s interpretation of pronouns in reported speech |
title_fullStr |
When 'you' isn’t you: The attraction of self-ascription in children’s interpretation of pronouns in reported speech |
title_full_unstemmed |
When 'you' isn’t you: The attraction of self-ascription in children’s interpretation of pronouns in reported speech |
title_sort |
when 'you' isn’t you: the attraction of self-ascription in children’s interpretation of pronouns in reported speech |
publisher |
Open Library of Humanities |
series |
Glossa |
issn |
2397-1835 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
In language comprehension, 'you 'is a 'de se 'pronoun, which means that its interpretation is guided by a simple 'de se 'rule ('you '= self-ascription by addressee), while the interpretation of other pronouns requires more complicated reasoning. This predicts that 'you 'should be easier to process than 'I 'or 'he', especially for children. But not all occurrences of 'you 'can be correctly interpreted via self-ascription. We consider two cases where 'you 'does not indicate self-ascription: interpretation as an eavesdropper and direct speech. In our experiment, we compare children’s interpretation of the pronouns 'I', 'you 'and 'he', in both direct and indirect reported speech, and in both addressee and eavesdropping situations. We tested 71 five-year-olds, 63 nine-year-olds, and 52 adults in a referent-selection task and found a clear 'de se 'effect for children when directly addressed: they performed better with 'you 'than with 'I'/'he 'in indirect speech, but worse with 'you 'than with 'I'/'he 'in direct speech. We explain the latter finding in terms of the attraction of the 'de se 'interpretation strategy, which leads addressees to automatically self-ascribe 'you 'even in a direct speech report. |
topic |
'de se' second person pronoun interpretation child language direct and indirect reported speech |
url |
http://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/187 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT franziskakoder whenyouisntyoutheattractionofselfascriptioninchildrensinterpretationofpronounsinreportedspeech AT emarmaier whenyouisntyoutheattractionofselfascriptioninchildrensinterpretationofpronounsinreportedspeech |
_version_ |
1721181163548049408 |