When 'you' isn’t you: The attraction of self-ascription in children’s interpretation of pronouns in reported speech

In language comprehension, 'you 'is a 'de se 'pronoun, which means that its interpretation is guided by a simple 'de se 'rule ('you '= self-ascription by addressee), while the interpretation of other pronouns requires more complicated reasoning. This predicts...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Franziska Köder, Emar Maier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Library of Humanities 2017-01-01
Series:Glossa
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/187
id doaj-a3209b284c35403a95739d70cd208ae6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a3209b284c35403a95739d70cd208ae62021-09-02T02:42:32ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesGlossa2397-18352017-01-012110.5334/gjgl.18754When 'you' isn’t you: The attraction of self-ascription in children’s interpretation of pronouns in reported speechFranziska Köder0Emar Maier1Centre for the Study of Mind in Nature (CSMN), University of OsloFaculty of Philosophy, University of GroningenIn language comprehension, 'you 'is a 'de se 'pronoun, which means that its interpretation is guided by a simple 'de se 'rule ('you '= self-ascription by addressee), while the interpretation of other pronouns requires more complicated reasoning. This predicts that 'you 'should be easier to process than 'I 'or 'he', especially for children. But not all occurrences of 'you 'can be correctly interpreted via self-ascription. We consider two cases where 'you 'does not indicate self-ascription: interpretation as an eavesdropper and direct speech. In our experiment, we compare children’s interpretation of the pronouns 'I', 'you 'and 'he', in both direct and indirect reported speech, and in both addressee and eavesdropping situations. We tested 71 five-year-olds, 63 nine-year-olds, and 52 adults in a referent-selection task and found a clear 'de se 'effect for children when directly addressed: they performed better with 'you 'than with 'I'/'he 'in indirect speech, but worse with 'you 'than with 'I'/'he 'in direct speech. We explain the latter finding in terms of the attraction of the 'de se 'interpretation strategy, which leads addressees to automatically self-ascribe 'you 'even in a direct speech report.http://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/187'de se'second personpronoun interpretationchild languagedirect and indirect reported speech
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Franziska Köder
Emar Maier
spellingShingle Franziska Köder
Emar Maier
When 'you' isn’t you: The attraction of self-ascription in children’s interpretation of pronouns in reported speech
Glossa
'de se'
second person
pronoun interpretation
child language
direct and indirect reported speech
author_facet Franziska Köder
Emar Maier
author_sort Franziska Köder
title When 'you' isn’t you: The attraction of self-ascription in children’s interpretation of pronouns in reported speech
title_short When 'you' isn’t you: The attraction of self-ascription in children’s interpretation of pronouns in reported speech
title_full When 'you' isn’t you: The attraction of self-ascription in children’s interpretation of pronouns in reported speech
title_fullStr When 'you' isn’t you: The attraction of self-ascription in children’s interpretation of pronouns in reported speech
title_full_unstemmed When 'you' isn’t you: The attraction of self-ascription in children’s interpretation of pronouns in reported speech
title_sort when 'you' isn’t you: the attraction of self-ascription in children’s interpretation of pronouns in reported speech
publisher Open Library of Humanities
series Glossa
issn 2397-1835
publishDate 2017-01-01
description In language comprehension, 'you 'is a 'de se 'pronoun, which means that its interpretation is guided by a simple 'de se 'rule ('you '= self-ascription by addressee), while the interpretation of other pronouns requires more complicated reasoning. This predicts that 'you 'should be easier to process than 'I 'or 'he', especially for children. But not all occurrences of 'you 'can be correctly interpreted via self-ascription. We consider two cases where 'you 'does not indicate self-ascription: interpretation as an eavesdropper and direct speech. In our experiment, we compare children’s interpretation of the pronouns 'I', 'you 'and 'he', in both direct and indirect reported speech, and in both addressee and eavesdropping situations. We tested 71 five-year-olds, 63 nine-year-olds, and 52 adults in a referent-selection task and found a clear 'de se 'effect for children when directly addressed: they performed better with 'you 'than with 'I'/'he 'in indirect speech, but worse with 'you 'than with 'I'/'he 'in direct speech. We explain the latter finding in terms of the attraction of the 'de se 'interpretation strategy, which leads addressees to automatically self-ascribe 'you 'even in a direct speech report.
topic 'de se'
second person
pronoun interpretation
child language
direct and indirect reported speech
url http://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/187
work_keys_str_mv AT franziskakoder whenyouisntyoutheattractionofselfascriptioninchildrensinterpretationofpronounsinreportedspeech
AT emarmaier whenyouisntyoutheattractionofselfascriptioninchildrensinterpretationofpronounsinreportedspeech
_version_ 1721181163548049408