Open research practices: unintended consequences and suggestions for averting them. (Commentary on the Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative)
The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative (PROI) is a move to enlist reviewers in the promotion of data-sharing. In this commentary, I discuss objections that can be raised, first to the specific proposals in the PROI, and second to data-sharing in general. I argue that although many objections h...
Main Author: | D. V. M. Bishop |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Royal Society
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Royal Society Open Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.160109 |
Similar Items
-
Large, open datasets for human connectomics research: Considerations for reproducible and responsible data use
by: Angela R. Laird
Published: (2021-12-01) -
Did awarding badges increase data sharing in BMJ Open? A randomized controlled trial
by: Anisa Rowhani-Farid, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01) -
SwissEnvEO: A FAIR National Environmental Data Repository for Earth Observation Open Science
by: Gregory Giuliani, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01) -
Sharing Specifications or Repeatability in Computer Systems Research
by: Collberg, Christian S, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Dispersion Plumes in Open Ocean Disposal Sites of Dredged Sediment
by: Elisa Helena Fernandes, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01)