Dosimetric Comparing between Protons Beam and Photons Beam 
for Lung Cancer Radiotherapy: A Meta-analysis

Background and objective The clinical evidences are not sufficient on the proton beam therapy of lung cancer for lacking of the RCTs on the comparing the proton with the photon beam in lung cancer radiotherapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the dosimetry superiority of the proton beam and pro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guangwei TIAN, Nan LI, Guang LI
Format: Article
Language:zho
Published: Chinese Anti-Cancer Association; Chinese Antituberculosis Association 2013-05-01
Series:Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2013.05.07
id doaj-a2f8edc8d98341d49e69ff092748b075
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a2f8edc8d98341d49e69ff092748b0752020-11-24T20:56:07ZzhoChinese Anti-Cancer Association; Chinese Antituberculosis AssociationChinese Journal of Lung Cancer1009-34191999-61872013-05-0116525226010.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2013.05.07Dosimetric Comparing between Protons Beam and Photons Beam 
for Lung Cancer Radiotherapy: A Meta-analysisGuangwei TIANNan LIGuang LIBackground and objective The clinical evidences are not sufficient on the proton beam therapy of lung cancer for lacking of the RCTs on the comparing the proton with the photon beam in lung cancer radiotherapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the dosimetry superiority of the proton beam and provide more valuable evidences to the clinical researches. Methods Clinical trails of dosimetric comparing between protons beam and photons beam for lung cancer radiotherapy were obtained from the Cochrane library, Pubmed, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and Wan Fang databases. The data included in the study were evaluated and analyzed using the Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.2 software. Results Six trails were included. Compared to photon therapy (three-dimensional conformal photon radiotherapy, 3D-CRT), the proton therapy had a significantly lower total lung Dmean (MD=-4.15, 95%CI: -5.56--2.74, P<0.001) and V20, V10, V5 (MD=-10.92, 95%CI: -13.23--8.62, P<0.001); The V20, V10, V5 significantly decreased in proton therapy group. Compared to photon therapy (intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy, IMRT), V20, V10, V5 were also significantly lowered in proton therapy group (MD=-3.70, 95%CI: -5.31--2.10, P<0.001; MD=-8.86, 95%CI: -10.74--6.98, P<0.001; MD=-20.13, 95%CI: -27.11--13.14, P<0.001); The esophagus Dmean was not lowered, while the heart Dmean decreased in proton therapy group. Conclusion Comparing to photon beam radiotherapy (3D-CRT and IMRT), proton beam therapy is advantageous in dosimetry of the lung cancer radiotherapy and recommended for clinical applying.http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2013.05.07ProtonPhotonMeta-analysisLung neoplasmsRadiotherapy
collection DOAJ
language zho
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Guangwei TIAN
Nan LI
Guang LI
spellingShingle Guangwei TIAN
Nan LI
Guang LI
Dosimetric Comparing between Protons Beam and Photons Beam 
for Lung Cancer Radiotherapy: A Meta-analysis
Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer
Proton
Photon
Meta-analysis
Lung neoplasms
Radiotherapy
author_facet Guangwei TIAN
Nan LI
Guang LI
author_sort Guangwei TIAN
title Dosimetric Comparing between Protons Beam and Photons Beam 
for Lung Cancer Radiotherapy: A Meta-analysis
title_short Dosimetric Comparing between Protons Beam and Photons Beam 
for Lung Cancer Radiotherapy: A Meta-analysis
title_full Dosimetric Comparing between Protons Beam and Photons Beam 
for Lung Cancer Radiotherapy: A Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Dosimetric Comparing between Protons Beam and Photons Beam 
for Lung Cancer Radiotherapy: A Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric Comparing between Protons Beam and Photons Beam 
for Lung Cancer Radiotherapy: A Meta-analysis
title_sort dosimetric comparing between protons beam and photons beam 
for lung cancer radiotherapy: a meta-analysis
publisher Chinese Anti-Cancer Association; Chinese Antituberculosis Association
series Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer
issn 1009-3419
1999-6187
publishDate 2013-05-01
description Background and objective The clinical evidences are not sufficient on the proton beam therapy of lung cancer for lacking of the RCTs on the comparing the proton with the photon beam in lung cancer radiotherapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the dosimetry superiority of the proton beam and provide more valuable evidences to the clinical researches. Methods Clinical trails of dosimetric comparing between protons beam and photons beam for lung cancer radiotherapy were obtained from the Cochrane library, Pubmed, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and Wan Fang databases. The data included in the study were evaluated and analyzed using the Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.2 software. Results Six trails were included. Compared to photon therapy (three-dimensional conformal photon radiotherapy, 3D-CRT), the proton therapy had a significantly lower total lung Dmean (MD=-4.15, 95%CI: -5.56--2.74, P<0.001) and V20, V10, V5 (MD=-10.92, 95%CI: -13.23--8.62, P<0.001); The V20, V10, V5 significantly decreased in proton therapy group. Compared to photon therapy (intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy, IMRT), V20, V10, V5 were also significantly lowered in proton therapy group (MD=-3.70, 95%CI: -5.31--2.10, P<0.001; MD=-8.86, 95%CI: -10.74--6.98, P<0.001; MD=-20.13, 95%CI: -27.11--13.14, P<0.001); The esophagus Dmean was not lowered, while the heart Dmean decreased in proton therapy group. Conclusion Comparing to photon beam radiotherapy (3D-CRT and IMRT), proton beam therapy is advantageous in dosimetry of the lung cancer radiotherapy and recommended for clinical applying.
topic Proton
Photon
Meta-analysis
Lung neoplasms
Radiotherapy
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2013.05.07
work_keys_str_mv AT guangweitian dosimetriccomparingbetweenprotonsbeamandphotonsbeamforlungcancerradiotherapyametaanalysis
AT nanli dosimetriccomparingbetweenprotonsbeamandphotonsbeamforlungcancerradiotherapyametaanalysis
AT guangli dosimetriccomparingbetweenprotonsbeamandphotonsbeamforlungcancerradiotherapyametaanalysis
_version_ 1716790727885717504