Les désaccords éditoriaux dans Wikipédia comme tensions entre régimes épistémiques
Despite its highly normative architecture, Wikipedia is a place of recurrent disagreements between contributors. By analyzing the arguments in a corpus of discussion pages for articles on highly controversial subjects (genetically modified organisms, September 11, etc.), the authors show that these...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fra |
Published: |
Université Laval
2019-07-01
|
Series: | Communication |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/communication/10788 |
id |
doaj-a2e66d14ed20496f8d710247837b5029 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a2e66d14ed20496f8d710247837b50292021-09-20T06:33:56ZfraUniversité LavalCommunication1189-37881920-73442019-07-0136210.4000/communication.10788Les désaccords éditoriaux dans Wikipédia comme tensions entre régimes épistémiquesGuillaume CarbouGilles SahutDespite its highly normative architecture, Wikipedia is a place of recurrent disagreements between contributors. By analyzing the arguments in a corpus of discussion pages for articles on highly controversial subjects (genetically modified organisms, September 11, etc.), the authors show that these arguments are partly fed by the existence on Wikipedia of concurrent “epistemic regimes”. These epistemic regimes (encyclopedic, scientific, scientistic, wikipedist, critical, and doxic) correspond to divergent notions of validity and the accepted methods for producing valid information.http://journals.openedition.org/communication/10788Wikipediaepistemic regimesvalidityargumentative analysisdisagreements |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
fra |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Guillaume Carbou Gilles Sahut |
spellingShingle |
Guillaume Carbou Gilles Sahut Les désaccords éditoriaux dans Wikipédia comme tensions entre régimes épistémiques Communication Wikipedia epistemic regimes validity argumentative analysis disagreements |
author_facet |
Guillaume Carbou Gilles Sahut |
author_sort |
Guillaume Carbou |
title |
Les désaccords éditoriaux dans Wikipédia comme tensions entre régimes épistémiques |
title_short |
Les désaccords éditoriaux dans Wikipédia comme tensions entre régimes épistémiques |
title_full |
Les désaccords éditoriaux dans Wikipédia comme tensions entre régimes épistémiques |
title_fullStr |
Les désaccords éditoriaux dans Wikipédia comme tensions entre régimes épistémiques |
title_full_unstemmed |
Les désaccords éditoriaux dans Wikipédia comme tensions entre régimes épistémiques |
title_sort |
les désaccords éditoriaux dans wikipédia comme tensions entre régimes épistémiques |
publisher |
Université Laval |
series |
Communication |
issn |
1189-3788 1920-7344 |
publishDate |
2019-07-01 |
description |
Despite its highly normative architecture, Wikipedia is a place of recurrent disagreements between contributors. By analyzing the arguments in a corpus of discussion pages for articles on highly controversial subjects (genetically modified organisms, September 11, etc.), the authors show that these arguments are partly fed by the existence on Wikipedia of concurrent “epistemic regimes”. These epistemic regimes (encyclopedic, scientific, scientistic, wikipedist, critical, and doxic) correspond to divergent notions of validity and the accepted methods for producing valid information. |
topic |
Wikipedia epistemic regimes validity argumentative analysis disagreements |
url |
http://journals.openedition.org/communication/10788 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT guillaumecarbou lesdesaccordseditoriauxdanswikipediacommetensionsentreregimesepistemiques AT gillessahut lesdesaccordseditoriauxdanswikipediacommetensionsentreregimesepistemiques |
_version_ |
1717374878532763648 |