Revaluation of zooplankton wet weight data of the NORPAC net samples collected in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean

The Japanese Antarctic Research Expedition (JARE) has been conducting routine observations of zooplankton in the Indian Ocean sector of the Southern Ocean with standard NORPAC nets (mesh size: 330 μm and 100 μm) every austral summer since the 1972/73 season (JARE-14). We used a new processing method...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yukiko Ukai, Kunio T. Takahashi, Mitsuo Fukuchi, Atsushi Tanimura
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: National Institute of Polar Research 2014-03-01
Series:Antarctic Record
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.15094/00009723
id doaj-a2de7e2cce584b978ac6cd0838f7c558
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a2de7e2cce584b978ac6cd0838f7c5582020-11-25T01:06:38ZengNational Institute of Polar ResearchAntarctic Record0085-72892432-079X2014-03-01581194110.15094/00009723Revaluation of zooplankton wet weight data of the NORPAC net samples collected in the Indian sector of the Southern OceanYukiko Ukai0Kunio T. Takahashi1Mitsuo Fukuchi2Atsushi Tanimura3Mie UniversityNational Institute of Polar ResearchNational Institute of Polar ResearchNational Institute of Polar ResearchThe Japanese Antarctic Research Expedition (JARE) has been conducting routine observations of zooplankton in the Indian Ocean sector of the Southern Ocean with standard NORPAC nets (mesh size: 330 μm and 100 μm) every austral summer since the 1972/73 season (JARE-14). We used a new processing method to measure the wet weight of the zooplankton only because the effect of the inclusion of phytoplankton on the wet weight has been problem in previous studies. The repeated-measurement made in this study show that 26.7 % of the total wet weight of the samples that were collected with 330 μm (targeting zooplankton) was attributable to phytoplankton. We have thus demonstrated that previous reports have overestimated the wet weight of zooplankton by approximately 30 %. Furthermore, when we compared the wet weights caught with the 330 μm and 100 μm nets, they did not differ significantly for zooplankton greater than 10 mm, whereas the wet weights of small sized zooplankton less than 10 mm caught with 100 μm nets were approximately two-fold greater than those caught with 330 μm nets.http://doi.org/10.15094/00009723
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yukiko Ukai
Kunio T. Takahashi
Mitsuo Fukuchi
Atsushi Tanimura
spellingShingle Yukiko Ukai
Kunio T. Takahashi
Mitsuo Fukuchi
Atsushi Tanimura
Revaluation of zooplankton wet weight data of the NORPAC net samples collected in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean
Antarctic Record
author_facet Yukiko Ukai
Kunio T. Takahashi
Mitsuo Fukuchi
Atsushi Tanimura
author_sort Yukiko Ukai
title Revaluation of zooplankton wet weight data of the NORPAC net samples collected in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean
title_short Revaluation of zooplankton wet weight data of the NORPAC net samples collected in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean
title_full Revaluation of zooplankton wet weight data of the NORPAC net samples collected in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean
title_fullStr Revaluation of zooplankton wet weight data of the NORPAC net samples collected in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean
title_full_unstemmed Revaluation of zooplankton wet weight data of the NORPAC net samples collected in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean
title_sort revaluation of zooplankton wet weight data of the norpac net samples collected in the indian sector of the southern ocean
publisher National Institute of Polar Research
series Antarctic Record
issn 0085-7289
2432-079X
publishDate 2014-03-01
description The Japanese Antarctic Research Expedition (JARE) has been conducting routine observations of zooplankton in the Indian Ocean sector of the Southern Ocean with standard NORPAC nets (mesh size: 330 μm and 100 μm) every austral summer since the 1972/73 season (JARE-14). We used a new processing method to measure the wet weight of the zooplankton only because the effect of the inclusion of phytoplankton on the wet weight has been problem in previous studies. The repeated-measurement made in this study show that 26.7 % of the total wet weight of the samples that were collected with 330 μm (targeting zooplankton) was attributable to phytoplankton. We have thus demonstrated that previous reports have overestimated the wet weight of zooplankton by approximately 30 %. Furthermore, when we compared the wet weights caught with the 330 μm and 100 μm nets, they did not differ significantly for zooplankton greater than 10 mm, whereas the wet weights of small sized zooplankton less than 10 mm caught with 100 μm nets were approximately two-fold greater than those caught with 330 μm nets.
url http://doi.org/10.15094/00009723
work_keys_str_mv AT yukikoukai revaluationofzooplanktonwetweightdataofthenorpacnetsamplescollectedintheindiansectorofthesouthernocean
AT kuniottakahashi revaluationofzooplanktonwetweightdataofthenorpacnetsamplescollectedintheindiansectorofthesouthernocean
AT mitsuofukuchi revaluationofzooplanktonwetweightdataofthenorpacnetsamplescollectedintheindiansectorofthesouthernocean
AT atsushitanimura revaluationofzooplanktonwetweightdataofthenorpacnetsamplescollectedintheindiansectorofthesouthernocean
_version_ 1725189067558092800