Revaluation of zooplankton wet weight data of the NORPAC net samples collected in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean
The Japanese Antarctic Research Expedition (JARE) has been conducting routine observations of zooplankton in the Indian Ocean sector of the Southern Ocean with standard NORPAC nets (mesh size: 330 μm and 100 μm) every austral summer since the 1972/73 season (JARE-14). We used a new processing method...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
National Institute of Polar Research
2014-03-01
|
Series: | Antarctic Record |
Online Access: | http://doi.org/10.15094/00009723 |
id |
doaj-a2de7e2cce584b978ac6cd0838f7c558 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a2de7e2cce584b978ac6cd0838f7c5582020-11-25T01:06:38ZengNational Institute of Polar ResearchAntarctic Record0085-72892432-079X2014-03-01581194110.15094/00009723Revaluation of zooplankton wet weight data of the NORPAC net samples collected in the Indian sector of the Southern OceanYukiko Ukai0Kunio T. Takahashi1Mitsuo Fukuchi2Atsushi Tanimura3Mie UniversityNational Institute of Polar ResearchNational Institute of Polar ResearchNational Institute of Polar ResearchThe Japanese Antarctic Research Expedition (JARE) has been conducting routine observations of zooplankton in the Indian Ocean sector of the Southern Ocean with standard NORPAC nets (mesh size: 330 μm and 100 μm) every austral summer since the 1972/73 season (JARE-14). We used a new processing method to measure the wet weight of the zooplankton only because the effect of the inclusion of phytoplankton on the wet weight has been problem in previous studies. The repeated-measurement made in this study show that 26.7 % of the total wet weight of the samples that were collected with 330 μm (targeting zooplankton) was attributable to phytoplankton. We have thus demonstrated that previous reports have overestimated the wet weight of zooplankton by approximately 30 %. Furthermore, when we compared the wet weights caught with the 330 μm and 100 μm nets, they did not differ significantly for zooplankton greater than 10 mm, whereas the wet weights of small sized zooplankton less than 10 mm caught with 100 μm nets were approximately two-fold greater than those caught with 330 μm nets.http://doi.org/10.15094/00009723 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yukiko Ukai Kunio T. Takahashi Mitsuo Fukuchi Atsushi Tanimura |
spellingShingle |
Yukiko Ukai Kunio T. Takahashi Mitsuo Fukuchi Atsushi Tanimura Revaluation of zooplankton wet weight data of the NORPAC net samples collected in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean Antarctic Record |
author_facet |
Yukiko Ukai Kunio T. Takahashi Mitsuo Fukuchi Atsushi Tanimura |
author_sort |
Yukiko Ukai |
title |
Revaluation of zooplankton wet weight data of the NORPAC net samples collected in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean |
title_short |
Revaluation of zooplankton wet weight data of the NORPAC net samples collected in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean |
title_full |
Revaluation of zooplankton wet weight data of the NORPAC net samples collected in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean |
title_fullStr |
Revaluation of zooplankton wet weight data of the NORPAC net samples collected in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean |
title_full_unstemmed |
Revaluation of zooplankton wet weight data of the NORPAC net samples collected in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean |
title_sort |
revaluation of zooplankton wet weight data of the norpac net samples collected in the indian sector of the southern ocean |
publisher |
National Institute of Polar Research |
series |
Antarctic Record |
issn |
0085-7289 2432-079X |
publishDate |
2014-03-01 |
description |
The Japanese Antarctic Research Expedition (JARE) has been conducting routine observations of zooplankton in the Indian Ocean sector of the Southern Ocean with standard NORPAC nets (mesh size: 330 μm and 100 μm) every austral summer since the 1972/73 season (JARE-14). We used a new processing method to measure the wet weight of the zooplankton only because the effect of the inclusion of phytoplankton on the wet weight has been problem in previous studies. The repeated-measurement made in this study show that 26.7 % of the total wet weight of the samples that were collected with 330 μm (targeting zooplankton) was attributable to phytoplankton. We have thus demonstrated that previous reports have overestimated the wet weight of zooplankton by approximately 30 %. Furthermore, when we compared the wet weights caught with the 330 μm and 100 μm nets, they did not differ significantly for zooplankton greater than 10 mm, whereas the wet weights of small sized zooplankton less than 10 mm caught with 100 μm nets were approximately two-fold greater than those caught with 330 μm nets. |
url |
http://doi.org/10.15094/00009723 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yukikoukai revaluationofzooplanktonwetweightdataofthenorpacnetsamplescollectedintheindiansectorofthesouthernocean AT kuniottakahashi revaluationofzooplanktonwetweightdataofthenorpacnetsamplescollectedintheindiansectorofthesouthernocean AT mitsuofukuchi revaluationofzooplanktonwetweightdataofthenorpacnetsamplescollectedintheindiansectorofthesouthernocean AT atsushitanimura revaluationofzooplanktonwetweightdataofthenorpacnetsamplescollectedintheindiansectorofthesouthernocean |
_version_ |
1725189067558092800 |