Comparing forecast systems with multiple correlation decomposition based on partial correlation

<p>The multiple correlation and/or regression information that two competing forecast systems have on the same observations is decomposed into four components, adapting the method of multivariate information decomposition of <span class="cit" id="xref_text.1"><a hr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. Glowienka-Hense, A. Hense, S. Brune, J. Baehr
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2020-10-01
Series:Advances in Statistical Climatology, Meteorology and Oceanography
Online Access:https://ascmo.copernicus.org/articles/6/103/2020/ascmo-6-103-2020.pdf
id doaj-a2b4deb8b37b424eb56e0065b9572944
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a2b4deb8b37b424eb56e0065b95729442020-11-25T02:46:39ZengCopernicus PublicationsAdvances in Statistical Climatology, Meteorology and Oceanography2364-35792364-35872020-10-01610311310.5194/ascmo-6-103-2020Comparing forecast systems with multiple correlation decomposition based on partial correlationR. Glowienka-Hense0A. Hense1S. Brune2J. Baehr3Institute for Geosciences, Universität Bonn, Bonn, GermanyInstitute for Geosciences, Universität Bonn, Bonn, GermanyInstitute of Oceanography, Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability (CEN), Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, GermanyInstitute of Oceanography, Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability (CEN), Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany<p>The multiple correlation and/or regression information that two competing forecast systems have on the same observations is decomposed into four components, adapting the method of multivariate information decomposition of <span class="cit" id="xref_text.1"><a href="#bib1.bibx29">Williams and Beer</a> (<a href="#bib1.bibx29">2010</a>)</span>, <span class="cit" id="xref_text.2"><a href="#bib1.bibx28">Wibral et al.</a> (<a href="#bib1.bibx28">2015</a>)</span>, and <span class="cit" id="xref_text.3"><a href="#bib1.bibx16">Lizier et al.</a> (<a href="#bib1.bibx16">2018</a>)</span>. Their concept is to divide source information about a target into total, (target) redundant or shared, and unique information from each source. It is applied here to the comparison of forecast systems using classic regression. Additionally, non-target redundant or shared information is newly defined that resumes the redundant information of the forecasts which is not observed. This provides views that go beyond classic correlation differences. These five terms share the same units and can be directly compared to put prediction results into perspective. The redundance terms in particular provide a new view. All components are given as maps of explained variance on the observations and for the non-target redundance on the models, respectively. Exerting this concept to lagged damped persistence is shown to be related to directed information entropy. To emphasize the benefit of the toolkit on all timescales, two analysis examples are provided. Firstly, two forecast systems of the German decadal prediction system of “Mittelfristige Klimaprognose”, namely the pre-operational version and a special version using ensemble Kalman filter for the ocean initialization, are compared. The analyses reveal the clear added value of the latter and provide an as yet unseen map of their non-target redundance. Secondly, 4&thinsp;d lead forecasts from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) are compared to a simple autoregressive and/or damped persistence model. The analysis of the information partition on this timescale shows that interannual changes in damped persistence, seen as target redundance changes between forecasts and damped persistence models, are balanced by associated changes in the added value of the dynamic forecasts in the extratropics but not in the tropics.</p>https://ascmo.copernicus.org/articles/6/103/2020/ascmo-6-103-2020.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author R. Glowienka-Hense
A. Hense
S. Brune
J. Baehr
spellingShingle R. Glowienka-Hense
A. Hense
S. Brune
J. Baehr
Comparing forecast systems with multiple correlation decomposition based on partial correlation
Advances in Statistical Climatology, Meteorology and Oceanography
author_facet R. Glowienka-Hense
A. Hense
S. Brune
J. Baehr
author_sort R. Glowienka-Hense
title Comparing forecast systems with multiple correlation decomposition based on partial correlation
title_short Comparing forecast systems with multiple correlation decomposition based on partial correlation
title_full Comparing forecast systems with multiple correlation decomposition based on partial correlation
title_fullStr Comparing forecast systems with multiple correlation decomposition based on partial correlation
title_full_unstemmed Comparing forecast systems with multiple correlation decomposition based on partial correlation
title_sort comparing forecast systems with multiple correlation decomposition based on partial correlation
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Advances in Statistical Climatology, Meteorology and Oceanography
issn 2364-3579
2364-3587
publishDate 2020-10-01
description <p>The multiple correlation and/or regression information that two competing forecast systems have on the same observations is decomposed into four components, adapting the method of multivariate information decomposition of <span class="cit" id="xref_text.1"><a href="#bib1.bibx29">Williams and Beer</a> (<a href="#bib1.bibx29">2010</a>)</span>, <span class="cit" id="xref_text.2"><a href="#bib1.bibx28">Wibral et al.</a> (<a href="#bib1.bibx28">2015</a>)</span>, and <span class="cit" id="xref_text.3"><a href="#bib1.bibx16">Lizier et al.</a> (<a href="#bib1.bibx16">2018</a>)</span>. Their concept is to divide source information about a target into total, (target) redundant or shared, and unique information from each source. It is applied here to the comparison of forecast systems using classic regression. Additionally, non-target redundant or shared information is newly defined that resumes the redundant information of the forecasts which is not observed. This provides views that go beyond classic correlation differences. These five terms share the same units and can be directly compared to put prediction results into perspective. The redundance terms in particular provide a new view. All components are given as maps of explained variance on the observations and for the non-target redundance on the models, respectively. Exerting this concept to lagged damped persistence is shown to be related to directed information entropy. To emphasize the benefit of the toolkit on all timescales, two analysis examples are provided. Firstly, two forecast systems of the German decadal prediction system of “Mittelfristige Klimaprognose”, namely the pre-operational version and a special version using ensemble Kalman filter for the ocean initialization, are compared. The analyses reveal the clear added value of the latter and provide an as yet unseen map of their non-target redundance. Secondly, 4&thinsp;d lead forecasts from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) are compared to a simple autoregressive and/or damped persistence model. The analysis of the information partition on this timescale shows that interannual changes in damped persistence, seen as target redundance changes between forecasts and damped persistence models, are balanced by associated changes in the added value of the dynamic forecasts in the extratropics but not in the tropics.</p>
url https://ascmo.copernicus.org/articles/6/103/2020/ascmo-6-103-2020.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT rglowienkahense comparingforecastsystemswithmultiplecorrelationdecompositionbasedonpartialcorrelation
AT ahense comparingforecastsystemswithmultiplecorrelationdecompositionbasedonpartialcorrelation
AT sbrune comparingforecastsystemswithmultiplecorrelationdecompositionbasedonpartialcorrelation
AT jbaehr comparingforecastsystemswithmultiplecorrelationdecompositionbasedonpartialcorrelation
_version_ 1724756854972612608