Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques for river flow forecasting

The use of Artificial Intelligence methods is becoming increasingly common in the modeling and forecasting of hydrological and water resource processes. In this study, applicability of Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) methods, Generalized Regression N...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M. Firat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2008-01-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/12/123/2008/hess-12-123-2008.pdf
id doaj-a2b4649b59e840679bf7a009ceac6c7f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a2b4649b59e840679bf7a009ceac6c7f2020-11-24T23:06:12ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382008-01-01121123139Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques for river flow forecastingM. FiratThe use of Artificial Intelligence methods is becoming increasingly common in the modeling and forecasting of hydrological and water resource processes. In this study, applicability of Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) methods, Generalized Regression Neural Networks (GRNN) and Feed Forward Neural Networks (FFNN), and Auto-Regressive (AR) models for forecasting of daily river flow is investigated and Seyhan River and Cine River was chosen as case study area. For the Seyhan River, the forecasting models are established using combinations of antecedent daily river flow records. On the other hand, for the Cine River, daily river flow and rainfall records are used in input layer. For both stations, the data sets are divided into three subsets, training, testing and verification data set. The river flow forecasting models having various input structures are trained and tested to investigate the applicability of ANFIS and ANN and AR methods. The results of all models for both training and testing are evaluated and the best fit input structures and methods for both stations are determined according to criteria of performance evaluation. Moreover the best fit forecasting models are also verified by verification set which was not used in training and testing processes and compared according to criteria. The results demonstrate that ANFIS model is superior to the GRNN and FFNN forecasting models, and ANFIS can be successfully applied and provide high accuracy and reliability for daily river flow forecasting. http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/12/123/2008/hess-12-123-2008.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. Firat
spellingShingle M. Firat
Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques for river flow forecasting
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
author_facet M. Firat
author_sort M. Firat
title Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques for river flow forecasting
title_short Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques for river flow forecasting
title_full Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques for river flow forecasting
title_fullStr Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques for river flow forecasting
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques for river flow forecasting
title_sort comparison of artificial intelligence techniques for river flow forecasting
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
publishDate 2008-01-01
description The use of Artificial Intelligence methods is becoming increasingly common in the modeling and forecasting of hydrological and water resource processes. In this study, applicability of Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) methods, Generalized Regression Neural Networks (GRNN) and Feed Forward Neural Networks (FFNN), and Auto-Regressive (AR) models for forecasting of daily river flow is investigated and Seyhan River and Cine River was chosen as case study area. For the Seyhan River, the forecasting models are established using combinations of antecedent daily river flow records. On the other hand, for the Cine River, daily river flow and rainfall records are used in input layer. For both stations, the data sets are divided into three subsets, training, testing and verification data set. The river flow forecasting models having various input structures are trained and tested to investigate the applicability of ANFIS and ANN and AR methods. The results of all models for both training and testing are evaluated and the best fit input structures and methods for both stations are determined according to criteria of performance evaluation. Moreover the best fit forecasting models are also verified by verification set which was not used in training and testing processes and compared according to criteria. The results demonstrate that ANFIS model is superior to the GRNN and FFNN forecasting models, and ANFIS can be successfully applied and provide high accuracy and reliability for daily river flow forecasting.
url http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/12/123/2008/hess-12-123-2008.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mfirat comparisonofartificialintelligencetechniquesforriverflowforecasting
_version_ 1725623677753491456