Research on Inversion Mechanism of Chlorophyll—A Concentration in Water Bodies Using a Convolutional Neural Network Model

• Main Authors: Yun Xue, Lei Zhu, Bin Zou, Yi-min Wen, Yue-hong Long, Song-lin Zhou
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2021-02-01
• Series: Water
• Subjects: convolutional neural network; chlorophyll-a; Dongting Lake
• Online Access: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/5/664

For Case-II water bodies with relatively complex water qualities, it is challenging to establish a chlorophyll-a concentration (Chl-a concentration) inversion model with strong applicability and high accuracy. Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) shows excellent performance in image target recognition and natural language processing. However, there little research exists on the inversion of Chl-a concentration in water using convolutional neural networks. Taking China’s Dongting Lake as an example, 90 water samples and their spectra were collected in this study. Using eight combinations as independent variables and Chl-a concentration as the dependent variable, a CNN model was constructed to invert Chl-a concentration. The results showed that: (1) The CNN model of the original spectrum has a worse inversion effect than the CNN model of the preprocessed spectrum. The determination coefficient (R_P²) of the predicted sample is increased from 0.79 to 0.88, and the root mean square error (RMSE_P) of the predicted sample is reduced from 0.61 to 0.49, indicating that preprocessing can significantly improve the inversion effect of the model.; (2) among the combined models, the CNN model with Baseline1_SC (strong correlation factor of 500–750 nm baseline) has the best effect, with R_P² reaching 0.90 and RMSEP only 0.45. The average inversion effect of the eight CNN models is better. The average R_P² reaches 0.86 and the RMSE_P is only 0.52, indicating the feasibility of applying CNN to Chl-a concentration inversion modeling; (3) the performance of the CNN model (Baseline1_SC (R_P² = 0.90, RMSE_P = 0.45)) was far better than the traditional model of the same combination, i.e., the linear regression model (R_P²= 0.61, RMSE_P= 0.72) and partial least squares regression model (Baseline1_SC (R_P²= 0.58. RMSE_P= 0.95)), indicating the superiority of the convolutional neural network inversion modeling of water body Chl-a concentration.