How does PTF Interpret Soil Heterogeneity? A Stochastic Approach Applied to a Case Study on Maize in Northern Italy
Soil water balance on a local scale is generally achieved by applying the classical nonlinear Richards equation that requires hydraulic properties, namely, water retention and hydraulic conductivity functions, to be known. Its application in agricultural systems on field or larger scales involves th...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-02-01
|
Series: | Water |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/2/275 |
id |
doaj-a2ac5b13896d41ae95f90667badf6860 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Angelo Basile Antonello Bonfante Antonio Coppola Roberto De Mascellis Salvatore Falanga Bolognesi Fabio Terribile Piero Manna |
spellingShingle |
Angelo Basile Antonello Bonfante Antonio Coppola Roberto De Mascellis Salvatore Falanga Bolognesi Fabio Terribile Piero Manna How does PTF Interpret Soil Heterogeneity? A Stochastic Approach Applied to a Case Study on Maize in Northern Italy Water hydraulic properties simulation model PTF Monte Carlo NDVI maize above ground biomass |
author_facet |
Angelo Basile Antonello Bonfante Antonio Coppola Roberto De Mascellis Salvatore Falanga Bolognesi Fabio Terribile Piero Manna |
author_sort |
Angelo Basile |
title |
How does PTF Interpret Soil Heterogeneity? A Stochastic Approach Applied to a Case Study on Maize in Northern Italy |
title_short |
How does PTF Interpret Soil Heterogeneity? A Stochastic Approach Applied to a Case Study on Maize in Northern Italy |
title_full |
How does PTF Interpret Soil Heterogeneity? A Stochastic Approach Applied to a Case Study on Maize in Northern Italy |
title_fullStr |
How does PTF Interpret Soil Heterogeneity? A Stochastic Approach Applied to a Case Study on Maize in Northern Italy |
title_full_unstemmed |
How does PTF Interpret Soil Heterogeneity? A Stochastic Approach Applied to a Case Study on Maize in Northern Italy |
title_sort |
how does ptf interpret soil heterogeneity? a stochastic approach applied to a case study on maize in northern italy |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Water |
issn |
2073-4441 |
publishDate |
2019-02-01 |
description |
Soil water balance on a local scale is generally achieved by applying the classical nonlinear Richards equation that requires hydraulic properties, namely, water retention and hydraulic conductivity functions, to be known. Its application in agricultural systems on field or larger scales involves three major problems being solved, related to (i) the assessment of spatial variability of soil hydraulic properties, (ii) accounting for this spatial variability in modelling large-scale soil water flow, and (iii) measuring the effects of such variability on real field variables (e.g., soil water storage, biomass, etc.). To deal with the first issue, soil hydraulic characterization is frequently performed by using the so-called pedotransfer functions (PTFs), whose effectiveness in providing the actual information on spatial variability has been questioned. With regard to the second problem, the variability of hydraulic properties at the field scale has often been dealt with using a relatively simple approach of considering soils in the field as an ensemble of parallel and statistically independent tubes, assuming only vertical flow. This approach in dealing with spatial variability has been popular in the framework of a Monte Carlo technique. As for the last issue, remote sensing seems to be the only viable solution to verify the pattern of variability, going by several modelling outputs which have considered the soil spatial variability. Based on these premises, the goals of this work concerning the issues discussed above are the following: (1) analyzing the sensitivity of a Richards-based model to the measured variability of θ(h) and k(θ) parameters; (2) establishing the predictive capability of PTF in terms of a simple comparison with measured data; and (3) establishing the effectiveness of use of PTF by employing as data quality control an independent and spatially distributed estimation of the Above Ground Biomass (AGB). The study area of approximately 2000 hectares mainly devoted to maize forage cultivation is located in the Po plain (Lodi), in northern Italy. Sample sites throughout the study area were identified for hydropedological analysis (texture, bulk density, organic matter content, and other chemical properties on all the samples, and water retention curve and saturated hydraulic conductivity on a sub-set). Several pedotransfer functions were tested; the PTF‒Vereckeen proved to be the best one to derive hydraulic properties of the entire soil database. The Monte Carlo approach was used to analyze model sensitivity to two measured input parameters: the slope of water retention curve (n) and the saturated hydraulic conductivity (k<sub>0</sub>). The analysis showed sensitivity of the simulated process to the parameter n being significantly higher than to k<sub>0</sub>, although the former was much less variable. The PTFs showed a smoothing effect of the output variability, even though they were previously validated on a set of measured data. Interesting positive and significant correlations were found between the n parameter, from measured water retention curves, and the NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index), when using multi-temporal (2004⁻2018) high resolution remotely sensed data on maize cultivation. No correlation was detected when the n parameter derived from PTF was used. These results from our case study mainly suggest that: (i) despite the good performance of PTFs calculated via error indexes, their use in the simulation of hydrological processes should be carefully evaluated for real field-scale applications; and (ii) the NDVI index may be used successfully as a proxy to evaluate PTF reliability in the field. |
topic |
hydraulic properties simulation model PTF Monte Carlo NDVI maize above ground biomass |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/2/275 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT angelobasile howdoesptfinterpretsoilheterogeneityastochasticapproachappliedtoacasestudyonmaizeinnorthernitaly AT antonellobonfante howdoesptfinterpretsoilheterogeneityastochasticapproachappliedtoacasestudyonmaizeinnorthernitaly AT antoniocoppola howdoesptfinterpretsoilheterogeneityastochasticapproachappliedtoacasestudyonmaizeinnorthernitaly AT robertodemascellis howdoesptfinterpretsoilheterogeneityastochasticapproachappliedtoacasestudyonmaizeinnorthernitaly AT salvatorefalangabolognesi howdoesptfinterpretsoilheterogeneityastochasticapproachappliedtoacasestudyonmaizeinnorthernitaly AT fabioterribile howdoesptfinterpretsoilheterogeneityastochasticapproachappliedtoacasestudyonmaizeinnorthernitaly AT pieromanna howdoesptfinterpretsoilheterogeneityastochasticapproachappliedtoacasestudyonmaizeinnorthernitaly |
_version_ |
1725340607837110272 |
spelling |
doaj-a2ac5b13896d41ae95f90667badf68602020-11-25T00:27:20ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412019-02-0111227510.3390/w11020275w11020275How does PTF Interpret Soil Heterogeneity? A Stochastic Approach Applied to a Case Study on Maize in Northern ItalyAngelo Basile0Antonello Bonfante1Antonio Coppola2Roberto De Mascellis3Salvatore Falanga Bolognesi4Fabio Terribile5Piero Manna6Institute for Mediterranean Agriculture and Forest Systems (ISAFOM)-Italian National Research Council (CNR), Via Patacca 85, 80056 Ercolano, ItalyInstitute for Mediterranean Agriculture and Forest Systems (ISAFOM)-Italian National Research Council (CNR), Via Patacca 85, 80056 Ercolano, ItalySchool of Agricultural, Forestry, Food and Environmental Sciences (SAFE), University of Basilicata, 85100 Potenza, ItalyInstitute for Mediterranean Agriculture and Forest Systems (ISAFOM)-Italian National Research Council (CNR), Via Patacca 85, 80056 Ercolano, ItalyARIESPACE s.r.l., Centro Direzionale IS A3, 80143 Napoli, ItalyCRISP-Interdepartmental Research Center on the Earth Critical Zone, Via Università 100, 80055 Portici, ItalyInstitute for Mediterranean Agriculture and Forest Systems (ISAFOM)-Italian National Research Council (CNR), Via Patacca 85, 80056 Ercolano, ItalySoil water balance on a local scale is generally achieved by applying the classical nonlinear Richards equation that requires hydraulic properties, namely, water retention and hydraulic conductivity functions, to be known. Its application in agricultural systems on field or larger scales involves three major problems being solved, related to (i) the assessment of spatial variability of soil hydraulic properties, (ii) accounting for this spatial variability in modelling large-scale soil water flow, and (iii) measuring the effects of such variability on real field variables (e.g., soil water storage, biomass, etc.). To deal with the first issue, soil hydraulic characterization is frequently performed by using the so-called pedotransfer functions (PTFs), whose effectiveness in providing the actual information on spatial variability has been questioned. With regard to the second problem, the variability of hydraulic properties at the field scale has often been dealt with using a relatively simple approach of considering soils in the field as an ensemble of parallel and statistically independent tubes, assuming only vertical flow. This approach in dealing with spatial variability has been popular in the framework of a Monte Carlo technique. As for the last issue, remote sensing seems to be the only viable solution to verify the pattern of variability, going by several modelling outputs which have considered the soil spatial variability. Based on these premises, the goals of this work concerning the issues discussed above are the following: (1) analyzing the sensitivity of a Richards-based model to the measured variability of θ(h) and k(θ) parameters; (2) establishing the predictive capability of PTF in terms of a simple comparison with measured data; and (3) establishing the effectiveness of use of PTF by employing as data quality control an independent and spatially distributed estimation of the Above Ground Biomass (AGB). The study area of approximately 2000 hectares mainly devoted to maize forage cultivation is located in the Po plain (Lodi), in northern Italy. Sample sites throughout the study area were identified for hydropedological analysis (texture, bulk density, organic matter content, and other chemical properties on all the samples, and water retention curve and saturated hydraulic conductivity on a sub-set). Several pedotransfer functions were tested; the PTF‒Vereckeen proved to be the best one to derive hydraulic properties of the entire soil database. The Monte Carlo approach was used to analyze model sensitivity to two measured input parameters: the slope of water retention curve (n) and the saturated hydraulic conductivity (k<sub>0</sub>). The analysis showed sensitivity of the simulated process to the parameter n being significantly higher than to k<sub>0</sub>, although the former was much less variable. The PTFs showed a smoothing effect of the output variability, even though they were previously validated on a set of measured data. Interesting positive and significant correlations were found between the n parameter, from measured water retention curves, and the NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index), when using multi-temporal (2004⁻2018) high resolution remotely sensed data on maize cultivation. No correlation was detected when the n parameter derived from PTF was used. These results from our case study mainly suggest that: (i) despite the good performance of PTFs calculated via error indexes, their use in the simulation of hydrological processes should be carefully evaluated for real field-scale applications; and (ii) the NDVI index may be used successfully as a proxy to evaluate PTF reliability in the field.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/2/275hydraulic propertiessimulation modelPTFMonte CarloNDVImaizeabove ground biomass |